- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Central Park 5/When they See Us
Posted on 6/9/19 at 11:23 am to JuiceTerry
Posted on 6/9/19 at 11:23 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
My only position is that none of them raped the woman
You invented a new crime
Like that crime of collusion with Russian
0
Posted on 6/9/19 at 11:36 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
The facts of the case
You didn't present any facts to support your conclusion.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 6:34 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Did it mention that the fact the DNA didn't belong to the boys was presented at both trials? Fools on the MTV board tried to pretend people in 1989 didn't understand what "the sperm we found belongs to someone else" meant.
At the time cops didn't really care much about DNA evidence since it was so new and was not admissible in court. Today, they would have done a through search of the scene of the crime in great detail. There was all kinds of evidence, many confessions and finger pointing among the young "wilding" thugs.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 6:43 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
My only position is that none of them raped the woman You invented a new crime
The problem with that assumption is that DNA testing was of little use in those days. It was very new and it was not admissible in court so the cops then weren't very interested in gathering DNA.
The young thugs ratted each other out even before they were questioned. They didn't know that even if they didn't do the rape themselves that holding her down for others is still legally rape.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 6/9/19 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 6/9/19 at 6:46 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Wrong
No facts in your post either.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 7:06 pm to Lsujacket66
If they were innocent of the rape charges, they put themselves in a terrible position by 'wilding out' in the park in the first place. When you spend your evening throwing bricks at taxi cabs and assaulting random people (one victim of theirs was described as looking as if his head had been dipped in blood) you take on the risk of being accused of other violent crimes that happened at the same time and in the immediate vicinity.
So even if they didn't rape her... oh fricking well. Don't be a violent thug and your chances of being wrongly accused of being a violent thug drop dramatically.
So even if they didn't rape her... oh fricking well. Don't be a violent thug and your chances of being wrongly accused of being a violent thug drop dramatically.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:19 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
So even if they didn't rape her... oh fricking well
You know what your dumbfrick logic results in...more victims...and that is exactly what happened here.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:24 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
So even if they didn't rape her... oh fricking well. Don't be a violent thug and your chances of being wrongly accused of being a violent thug drop dramatically
Yeah that line of thinking should definitely be avoided. It's quite similar to a line of thinking that is driving the left's war against Trump in the personal realm.
ETA...actually, not just personal realm, all realms.
This post was edited on 6/9/19 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:28 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Nope
Try a full sentence.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:34 pm to brgfather129
quote:I was giving my reasoning for not feeling bad for the CP5, regardless of whether or not they were wrongly accused of the rape. They earned their prison time on the other charges, alone. That doesn't mean that I'm glad the actual rapist went free or that justice was necessarily served in the case of the rape. Try to keep up, Dr Logic.
You know what your dumbfrick logic results in...more victims...and that is exactly what happened here.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:37 pm to davyjones
quote:Are you guys under the impression that the rape is the only thing they were convicted of? I was speaking as to why I don't feel bad for them.
Yeah that line of thinking should definitely be avoided. It's quite similar to a line of thinking that is driving the left's war against Trump in the personal realm.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:42 pm to brgfather129
quote:
You didn't present any facts to support your conclusion.
I actually have posted a few facts in this thread, but I laid out everything that led me to my conclusion on the MTV board. I've already stated I'll post it here when I get the time. Will probably be tomorrow when I have down time at work.
What have you added to the discussion?
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:46 pm to Lsujacket66
Funny that those pussies couldn't handle facts they didn't like so they cried to an admin and had the thread locked.
I guess that's why they are too chicken shite to show their faces over here, a forum where dissenting opinions are allowed.
Reading through the MTV board makes it easier to understand how people fall for CNN and Russian propaganda/dossiers.
I guess that's why they are too chicken shite to show their faces over here, a forum where dissenting opinions are allowed.
Reading through the MTV board makes it easier to understand how people fall for CNN and Russian propaganda/dossiers.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:48 pm to Lsujacket66
Yeah, it intrigued me. But anything that glamorizes their actions or paints them as anything but thugs is inaccurate.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:49 pm to northshorebamaman
Clarification understood. The oh fricking well addition made it possible to take it otherwise. Perhaps "rape or no rape, they still earned their punishment on the other convictions" or something similar.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:52 pm to davyjones
quote:Fair enough. That was my point.
Clarification understood. The oh fricking well addition made it possible to take it otherwise. Perhaps "rape or no rape, they still earned their punishment on the other convictions" or something similar.
They robbed and beat at least two other people that night. One of them severely.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 8:54 pm to brgfather129
quote:
Try a full sentence.
Ok: I said nope.
Posted on 6/9/19 at 9:05 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Clarification understood. The oh fricking well addition made it possible to take it otherwise. Perhaps "rape or no rape, they still earned their punishment on the other convictions" or something similar.
Fair enough. That was my point.
They robbed and beat at least two other people that night. One of them severely.
Im with ya
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News