re: Catherine Herridge is tearing this Dem memo apart. ETA: diGenova speaks out: "silly memo"

quote:

---

Both memo’s are ignorant and partisan.

---

We deserve to know the TRUTH!

ETA 2/26:

Joe DiGenova: Schiff Memo | FBI Dir. Wray | Carter Page | NRA | Rosenstein | Sheriff Scott IsraelNow Joe diGenova speaks out & says the dem "silly" memo has the most glaring omission possible. The fact it makes no mention of the McCabe testimony that "but for the Steele dossier the affidavit in support of the warrant to the FISC never would have been submitted" isn't even addressed. They ignore it completely & it dessimates their memo. In addition, according to the DEM MEMO itself, the FBI & DOJ NEVER told the FISC that the source of the Steele dossier was the Clinton campaign & the DNC. And finally, the Carter Page warrant was initially denied in June 2016 & was only granted once the Steele dossier was included!!! The FBI went around looking for stuff to obtain that warrant! Rosenstein needs to appoint a grand jury. All senior Obama DOJ officials, along with FBI officials need to be questioned by this grand jury, under penalty of perjury. There is unmasking which is questionable & there is also LEAKING in which there is already 27 investigations underway. There could already be a grand jury underway in this case by the AG BUT we have no evidence of that---they are just investigating the leaks.

He further states that dems are OK with destroying the FBI & DOJ in service to the dem party. Dirty & slithering (he mentions Schiff specifically).

Also, he says a FISA warrant isn't as high a standard as an actual criminal warrant. Interesting.

quote:

---

Nunes has admitted that he was summarizing his OWN opinion of McCabe's testimony as a whole

---

you keep acting like nunes is just making up stuff out of thin air. no one is denying what is in the memo. not even the dem response

quote:

---

either she doesn't know about Nunes' admission about McCabe's testimony, or she has chosen to disregard that inconvenient fact.

---

you keep acting this is something when it's not. perhaps because everybody else knows that nunes isn't making things up like you think he is. it's not a partisan document. it's just a summary of what everyone else already knows. the dem response is that it's TOO selective/condensed, not that it's false. apparently, you're the only person who hasn't caught on to this

quote:

---

This is what the warrant said according to the Democrats' Memo

---

first, it's funny that the dems are discrediting the nunes memo but expect everyone to just accept theirs as gospel truth. second, as stated in the nunes memo, this note does not disclose the political nature. it says obliquely that the person might ALSO have been looking for political information, not that steele was hired to do that specifically. the "research" was about russian ties, not campaign issues. nunes/gowdy/et al, were right. third, even if this note were more explicit and forthcoming, the issue still stands. either the fbi lied, the fisc didn't read the note or they were both complicit for issuing a baseless, unjustified warrant. the fbi is still on the hook for page investigation and they would never have even approached the fisc with this crapshow unless it were politically motivated. the only remaining question is the complicity of the fisc

quote:

---

The Memo should provide the source material for every accusation. Which, of course, it did not.

---

yet everyone who has seen the source material confirms the nunes summary and no one is denying the contents of the memo, not even the dem response

quote:

---

They can't say Clinton because it is FISA, she is a U.S. citizen, and she wasn't the subject of the nvestigation

---

so they didn't reveal the political nature of the request. thank you for acknowledging what we've all been trying to say

quote:

---

Both memo’s are ignorant and partisan. They are both full of opinions with bits of facts

---

absurd. EVERYONE acknowledges that the fbi should not have approached the fisc with this case and a fisa warrant should never have been issued for this case. that means the nunes memo is asking the right questions and the dem memo is trying to keep people from asking questions about the process.

but you're right, we should just let it go

quote:

---

Just stop if you're going to lie

---

i explained it plainly and you didn't even bother to address it. multiple people have pointed out that the fbi wasn't forthcoming so it isn't just me. everyone who is reasonable acknowledges that the fbi went to the court with a crap case and that the court should have never issued the warrant. the only question left to answer at this point is if the court was complicit or if the fbi sufficiently lied to them so as to mislead them.

quote:

---

It's been addressed

---

no it hasn't. all you did was just repeat what was refuted by several people in this thread. but i agree that's all you have. just repeat leftist talking points and not actually engage the issue.

quote:

---

That pretty much ends Nunes' bombshell and proves that his memo was inaccurate and incomplete

---

well this matter should just disappear if you're correct, right?

quote:

---

And lol at Nunes complaining because the FBI didn't use names

---

yeah there was more to it than that. you know it but it's predictable for you to act like there wasn't more to it.

quote:

---

As I said, though, the whole committee is a farce and should be disbanded yesterday

---

the house intelligence committee.