- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candace Owens Claiming Tyler Robertson Innocent on Her Instagram Story
Posted on 9/27/25 at 7:18 am to Burt Reynolds
Posted on 9/27/25 at 7:18 am to Burt Reynolds
Candace Owens is essentially just the modern day National Inquirer, except instead of aliens doing everything, it's the Jews.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:59 am to CR4090
quote:
Zionism is a cancer
Fixed
This post was edited on 9/27/25 at 11:00 am
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:38 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
Yep. It’s interesting and fun to talk about.
Good grief.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:45 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Good grief.
In 24 hours, that is best you have.
I win.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:48 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
I also believe a lot of people conspired. I do not believe it was jews or the government. I believe it was a group of radicalized leftists.
And that may be true, and there's actual evidence to suggest that that may be true.
There's only evidence to suggest that there was one actual shooter, but there's evidence that the old guy at the event may have intentionally acted as a decoy, and there's evidence to suggest that multiple online contacts knew in advance of the shooting that it was going to happen.
I don't object to exploring connections with actual confirmed evidence.
That's using facts and inductive reasoning as well as abductive reasoning to conclude the inference to the best explanation.
What I object to is doing things like saying, "Well, that couldn't have been a 30 06 round," when you have absolutely no expertise to determine that. I object to sitting there going, "Hmmm...Charlie Kirk softened his support for Israel lately...THAT'S IT! It had to be the Joos!" Or any evidence from official sources that point to a conclusion that is just too boring for the likes of the guy I was posting with above, saying, "Ha! Like I would believe anything the GOVERNMENT says about this."
That's just acting like an idiot.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:50 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
In 24 hours, that is best you have.
I just read your reply five minutes ago.
And what do you want me to say to what you admitted to?
You basically just admitted to being a raging moron with respect to conspiracy nonsense. I'm supposed to try to reason with that?
I thought "Good grief" was about as polite as I could be. I was trying to be kind.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:55 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I just read your reply five minutes ago. And what do you want me to say to what you admitted to? You basically just admitted to being a raging moron with respect to conspiracy nonsense. I'm supposed to try to reason with that? I thought "Good grief" was about as polite as I could be. I was trying to be kind.
What a Low T response. You lost.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 10:56 pm to Burt Reynolds
quote:
What a Low T response. You lost.
O.k., I lost.
You're still a self-admitted moron with an IQ south of 85.
Comparatively speaking, I'm fine with that outcome.
You think the moon landing was faked, don't you?
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:00 pm to wackatimesthree
Oh we landed on the moon.
Popular
Back to top

0





