Started By
Message

re: Can the President pardon someone for a felony?

Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:30 pm to
quote:


If that statute takes away a power the President is given by the Constitution it is not worth the paper it's printed on. Cfpb should ring a bell


Tell that to the courts. The special counsel does not serve at the pleasure of the president. There are set guidlines for hiring and firing SC’s. and who holds such power. The Saturday night massacre which Terry posted left out a key element of the firing of the Watergate sc. Nixon did not fire the SC. The acting ag did after the Ag refused to fire the special counsel as Nixon had demanded. The matter went to court and it was ruled the firing was illegal because the sc had not violated any of the statute. Simply put, the president does not have the authority to fire the special counsel. Period end of story.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 8:38 pm
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:33 pm to
The Court declares that Archibald Cox, appointed Watergate Special Prosecutor pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.37 (1973), was illegally discharged from that office.
quote:

110 Ordered and Decreed that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an Amended Complaint and add additional plaintiffs is granted. (2) Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is denied, and the trial of the action on the merits is advanced and consolidated with the hearing on said motion. (3) Mr. Ralph Nader is dismissed as plaintiff for lack of standing. (4) All injunctions prayed for in the Amended Complaint are denied. (5) The Court declares that Archibald Cox, appointed Watergate Special Prosecutor pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.37 (1973), was illegally discharged from that office.


This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

That's a pretty awful approach to crime and punishment and I'd be willing to bet you'd only apply it to people who share your political leanings


Well...
1. I don't have the same political leanings as Flynn so...
2. The left has proven "crime & punishment" is determined by political leanings.
3. Furthermore, the left has drifted away from the rule of law in general soooooo:

I want some of that approach.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:45 pm to
Nothing but crickets in here now. Gotta admit that it feels pretty good to shoot holes in a phony narrative and then take a flame thrower to it with actual case law.

This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 8:46 pm
Posted by Engineer22
Member since Nov 2012
1915 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:50 pm to
Really I thought this whole argument ended on page 2. Trump can get rid of Mueller if he wants.

Was Cox reappointed and the case reopened after he was fired... no
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2897 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Nothing but crickets in here now. Gotta admit that it feels pretty good to shoot holes in a phony narrative and then take a flame thrower to it with actual case law.


Tell us Blizzard, did Mr Cox get replaced or get his job back. And you are correct about selling it to the court, that's what Mr Mueller would have to do after being fired. He would have to go to court to prove he was ILLEGALLY fired.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Engineer22
Member since Nov 2012
1915 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:52 pm to
With all of the Clinton cronies Mueller has hired. Trump has plenty of cause to can him.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2897 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:52 pm to
If i win in court against my employer for being illegally fired does that mean my employer can longer fire anyone?
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Well...
1. I don't have the same political leanings as Flynn so...
2. The left has proven "crime & punishment" is determined by political leanings.
3. Furthermore, the left has drifted away from the rule of law in general soooooo:

I want some of that approach.

I guess if you think "the left" is doin it right

And Chiz, the crickets are because everybody is tired of telling you the truth and you just playing dumb, brah
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Was Cox reappointed and the case reopened after he was fired... no


Cox had already gone back to a private sector job, and a new sc had been appointed by the time of the verdict. Trump simply can’t start firing ag’s until one fires Muller as Terry had argued. This was ruled illegal by the courts. Only the Ag can fire Muller and only if he violates the statute. The Trump will fire Muller narrative is not based in fact or reality.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 8:59 pm to
quote:


And Chiz, the crickets are because everybody is tired of telling you the truth and you just playing dumb, brah



Sit down and keep quiet. You lost the argument. I beat your arse with stautes and case law. You have no rebuttle but to cry well if Trump really really wants him gone, he will make him gone. No, no he won’t. Sorry you can’t grasp the concept of legal authority.
Posted by Engineer22
Member since Nov 2012
1915 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:00 pm to
Dude you're locked into some BS technicality when the answer has been staring you in the face.

Prior case law on this stage is a very grey area. Good that there is some I guess. Does it mean much probably not.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 9:01 pm
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2897 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:00 pm to
Bilzz you do realize that Cox was appointed using SPECIAL ONE TIME REGULATIONS?
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 9:01 pm
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:09 pm to
So how’s he gonna fire Muller? You guys are all convinced he can and will, so tell me how he does it? Give me a staute. Give me some case law. Saturday night massacre 2? Cant go that route. Court ruled it illegal. Gonna do it himself? What statute gives him legal authority?

Posted by cajunandy
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2015
671 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:10 pm to
28 CFR 600.7 is not a statute. It is a regulation and does not have the same force of a statute in the US Code.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:11 pm to
OK. Don't take my word for it, just read any of the thousands of articles explaining exactly how Trump could end Mueller.

Posted by Engineer22
Member since Nov 2012
1915 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:12 pm to
My argument has been if Mueller was really after Trump, then Trump could fire him and nothing you have posted has convinced me otherwise. The fact that he hasn't is telling.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:13 pm to
It is part of the statute that establishes the special counsel and gives him legal authority to conduct an investigation. Please try harder. Im still waiting for a valid argument, not just an emotional because he’s unhinged argument.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 9:14 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

not just an emotional because he’s unhinged argument.
Not one person has made that argument

How stoned are you?
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

My argument has been if Mueller was really after Trump, then Trump could fire him and nothing you have posted has convinced me otherwise. The fact that he hasn't is telling.


And my argument is that if muller is really after Trump, he cant fire him. Ive backed it up multiple times. He doesn’t have the legal authority to fire him, on Rosenstein can. He also can’t fire Rosenstein and appoint someone acting ag just to fire Muller either. Nader v Bork ruled that illegal. Muller must violate a provision of the statute in order to be fired, and only then can Rosenstein fire him. That holds a bit mord weight than what some journalists or pundits want to say.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 9:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram