Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Breaking: Mueller Withheld Exculpatory Evidence from Court to Exonerate Trump

Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:29 pm
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21259 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:29 pm
thegatewaypundit - will get DVs

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/12/breaking-mueller-withheld-exculpatory-evidence-from-court-to-exonerate-trump-mueller-lied-to-the-court-will-he-be-sent-to-jail-too/

quote:

Contrary to media speculation that Robert Mueller is closing in on President Trump, the special prosecutor’s plea deal with Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen offers further evidence that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russians during the 2016 election, according to congressional investigators and former prosecutors.

Cohen pleaded guilty last week to making false statements in 2017 to the Senate intelligence committee about the Trump Organization’s failed efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. Discussions about the so-called Moscow Project continued five months longer in 2016 than Cohen had initially stated under oath.

The nine-page charging document filed with the plea deal suggests that the special counsel is using the Moscow tower talks to connect Trump to Russia. But congressional investigators with House and Senate committees leading inquiries on the Russia question told RealClearInvestigations that it looks like Mueller withheld from the court details that would exonerate the president. They made this assessment in light of the charging document, known as a statement of “criminal information” (filed in lieu of an indictment when a defendant agrees to plead guilty); a fuller accounting of Cohen’s emails and text messages that Capitol Hill sources have seen; and the still-secret transcripts of closed-door testimony provided by a business associate of Cohen.

On page 7 of the statement of criminal information filed against Cohen, which is separate from but related to the plea agreement, Mueller mentions that Cohen tried to email Russian President Vladimir Putin’s office on Jan. 14, 2016, and again on Jan. 16, 2016. But Mueller, who personally signed the document, omitted the fact that Cohen did not have any direct points of contact at the Kremlin, and had resorted to sending the emails to a general press mailbox. Sources who have seen these additional emails point out that this omitted information undercuts the idea of a “back channel” and thus the special counsel’s collusion case.
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12072 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:30 pm to
But muh USAToday said we got him now!
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

had resorted to sending the emails to a general press mailbox.




how embarrassing
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:31 pm to
Of course he did. He is a swamp POS who is trying to save himself from the disgraceful "investigation" he is running

A true national embarrassment. I'm sure liberals love what he is doing
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146907 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:35 pm to
post RCP's story to deviate from all of the gateway pundit usual replies.

LINK
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:38 pm to
No!!!!!!!!!

I will only read it from the pristinely unbiased wapo - they will get right on it!

Haha
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51296 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Breaking


Oh snap

quote:

thegatewaypundit


This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 12:39 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146907 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

The nine-page charging document filed with the plea deal suggests that the special counsel is using the Moscow tower talks to connect Trump to Russia. But congressional investigators with House and Senate committees leading inquiries on the Russia question told RealClearInvestigations that it looks like Mueller withheld from the court details that would exonerate the president. They made this assessment in light of the charging document, known as a statement of “criminal information” (filed in lieu of an indictment when a defendant agrees to plead guilty); a fuller accounting of Cohen’s emails and text messages that Capitol Hill sources have seen; and the still-secret transcripts of closed-door testimony provided by a business associate of Cohen.

On page 7 of the statement of criminal information filed against Cohen, which is separate from but related to the plea agreement, Mueller mentions that Cohen tried to email Russian President Vladimir Putin’s office on Jan. 14, 2016, and again on Jan. 16, 2016. But Mueller, who personally signed the document, omitted the fact that Cohen did not have any direct points of contact at the Kremlin, and had resorted to sending the emails to a general press mailbox. Sources who have seen these additional emails point out that this omitted information undercuts the idea of a “back channel” and thus the special counsel's collusion case.

Page 2 of the same criminal information document holds additional exculpatory evidence for Trump, sources say. It quotes an August 2017 letter from Cohen to the Senate intelligence committee in which he states that Trump “was never in contact with anyone about this [Moscow Project] proposal other than me.” This section of Cohen’s written testimony, unlike other parts, is not disputed as false by Mueller, which sources say means prosecutors have tested its veracity through corroborating sources and found it to be accurate.

Also notable, Mueller did not challenge Cohen’s statement that he “ultimately determined that the proposal was not feasible and never agreed to make a trip to Russia.”

“Though Cohen may have lied to Congress about the dates,” one Hill investigator said, “it's clear from personal messages he sent in 2015 and 2016 that the Trump Organization did not have formal lines of communication set up with Putin’s office or the Kremlin during the campaign. There was no secret ‘back channel.’”

“So as far as collusion goes,” the source added, "the project is actually more exculpatory than incriminating for Trump and his campaign.”

Mueller’s office declined comment to RealClearInvestigations.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146907 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:40 pm to
the progs and boosie will scream GATEWAY PUNDIT ignoring that they aggregated it from RCP.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146907 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:41 pm to
best part of all of this

quote:

Mueller’s office declined comment to RealClearInvestigations.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 12:42 pm to
I don't care where it came from. It's kinda of a nothingburger to me, though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram