- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:09 pm to cajunangelle
Has anyone checked on TigerDoc, Decatur, and JussieTerry yet?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:27 pm to cajunangelle
this tweet made my day...
"The poll found that 51 percent of voters surveyed said they believed Cohen ... according to a new American Barometer survey released on Monday."
"Thirty-seven percent of registered voters contacted Feb. 28 and March 1 for The Hill-HarrisX poll said they found Cohen's testimony credible, compared to 25 percent who said they did not."
gosh why do you think John Solomon, who "has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals" would use two different polls like that? with different sets of questions? oohh, you dont think he maybe just looked around until he found the numbers he was looking for, do you?
trump fans are so entertaining.
quote:so lets take a look at that...
How do you measure impact of Dem hearing with Cohen? Check this out: 51% thought he was credible before testimony ... And only 37% afterwards.
"The poll found that 51 percent of voters surveyed said they believed Cohen ... according to a new American Barometer survey released on Monday."
"Thirty-seven percent of registered voters contacted Feb. 28 and March 1 for The Hill-HarrisX poll said they found Cohen's testimony credible, compared to 25 percent who said they did not."
gosh why do you think John Solomon, who "has been accused of biased reporting in favor of conservatives, and of repeatedly manufacturing faux scandals" would use two different polls like that? with different sets of questions? oohh, you dont think he maybe just looked around until he found the numbers he was looking for, do you?
trump fans are so entertaining.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:28 pm to MastrShake
Man that's kind of like that poll stating Hillary had a 98% chance of winning on election night!
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:28 pm to MastrShake
This horse shite you just posted does NOTHING to deflect what this bombshell means.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:31 pm to bamarep
quote:
This horse shite you just posted does NOTHING to deflect what this bombshell means.
MastrShake didn't even read the story. He turned on CNN, checked Rachel Maddow's twitter feed, and saw they were only reporting on Mr. Kellyanne Conway, so he figured this wasn't a bombshell
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:46 pm to Bunyan
quote:oh wow. theres no way youre still doing this one.
Man that's kind of like that poll stating Hillary had a 98% chance of winning on election night!
you can always find some fringe poll spouting nonsense, but 535 predicted a close race from day 1, even tied at one point, and in the end they thought Clinton would get 48.5 percent of the popular vote (polls do not predict electoral votes, just popular)
it turns out that she got...
umm. 48.5 percent.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:51 pm to MastrShake
quote:
it turns out that she got...
umm. 48.5 percent.
The predictions were that she would WIN and that was posted by Bunyan...did she win? No, but the rest of us sure did!
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 4:53 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News