re: Bongino: It's Bigger Than We Thought It Was (Episode 1,000)

quote:

---

Trump is quite literally our last hope.

---

True. If this opportunity to drain the swamp goes awry then I seriously doubt it will ever happen. In fact, if the Democrats ever regain complete control they will seek retribution in a way that would make Chairman Mao blush.

We must do it now. We must take full advantage of this opportunity.

quote:

---

Just curious, dude. When you're proven wrong about what's coming, are you going to be man enough to admit it?

---

What will he be admitting to? That he's skeptical that powerful people will be held accountable for their actions?

frick, we all should be skeptical.

quote:

---

What will he be admitting to? 

---

That he was wrong? That maybe he was foolish to mock the posters who had figured it out? That maybe he was a jerk to try and hijack non-Q threads with smartass Q comments?

Not surprised that you would defend him. I figured you out for the phony you were in the Q thread a long time ago. I guess the powers-that-be figured you out, too, because they wouldn't even let you post in that thread for months.

quote:

---

Not surprised that you would defend him. I figured you out for the phony you were in the Q thread a long time ago. I guess the powers-that-be figured you out, too, because they wouldn't even let you post in that thread for months.

---

You sure do seem to like to jump to conclusions without the proper amount of evidence.

I've been team Q since day 1, and that hasn't changed; however, I'm also objective enough to realize that what we have, as far as evidence proving that Q is a decision making insider focused on dropping the hammer, wouldn't even meet the lowest legal burden in a civil case: preponderance of the evidence.

And those frickers did tell me to stay out of that thread. They like yall coddled; I like yall prepared to defend your conclusions. I like yall realizing when there are holes in your arguments, which do not allow for a logical defense, so you could learn to respond to logical people with "I cant really answer that" instead of dumb, illogical bullshite. And, since outsiders weren't allowed to truly question anything past a post or three, an insider had to do it.

The funniest part was a poster (maybe vox) later making a comment about how a twitter user might have been sounding anti-Q in order to facilitate good "Q proof" type discussions. I laughed, because nobody seemed to notice that I had been showing anti Q type sentiment, for like a year, for the same purpose.

Further, it is shite or get off the pot time. frick their plan if their plan had them truly starting the rollout during an election year. frick their plan if they were going to give this media the opportunity to use that "politically motivated" during an election year bullshite excuse. And, if it's all true, we have a bit of say in the timing. We could have pushed the time table if we screamed loud enough; pushed it if enough were getting impatient.

You have fun trying to get your life wins on an internet message board though. On the grand scheme of things, id rather us be your opportunity for your "life wins" than an innocent wife, child, or the 7/11 employees.

Keep it up in the Q thread though. You guys are doing great. I don't keep up much lately, but their seems to be a lot less fringe shite, and the more knowledgable folks have taken the reins.

And chill the frick out with the crow eating bullshite. It doesnt, and wont, help. You're just speculating one way, while they speculate the other. I go you're way with my speculating, but I can definitely see their pov too. In the past, weve been the goofy fricker trying to get the dollar on the insurance commercial, as far as justice for our elite is concerned.

quote:

---

And chill the frick out with the crow eating bullshite.

---

This thread was about Dan Bongino's latest podcast. Nobody should've even mentioned Q in this thread. But right off the bat, some jerk felt the need to troll it. And then 1 or 2 of the usual suspects joined in on the fun.

How one takes that and accuses me of anything is mind-boggling to say the least. I simply put the punk-arse troll in his place. Seriously, how could any OBJECTIVE person see it any other way?

quote:

---

Just curious, dude. When you're proven wrong about what's coming, are you going to be man enough to admit it?

---

Sounds just like the dolts who bought into the Muh Russia conspiracy.

quote:

---

I'm guessing you won't be.

---

Will you?

quote:

---

That he was wrong? That maybe he was foolish to mock the posters who had figured it out? That maybe he was a jerk to try and hijack non-Q threads with smartass Q comments?

Not surprised that you would defend him. I figured you out for the phony you were in the Q thread a long time ago. I guess the powers-that-be figured you out, too, because they wouldn't even let you post in that thread for months.

---

Trust Wray.

You can control content in your special thread. But you can't here. Why do you think you got it all figured out? You don't, no one does. If it is because YOU knew about five eyes, that came out years ago with Snowden and how corrupt they were with our Brennan types.

You really need to stop demanding people tell you how only YOU Q people knew what was going to happen; and just pray to God full justice is served. I read an article the other day on how Q is a pied piper psy op from the bad guys in the deep state. It makes a heck of a lot more sense than picking out a number from 1998 and seeing Q and DJT post the same number so something will happen. I could go on and on about all of the flaws, including GTMO and tribunals, JFK Jr. alive, HRC in jail 3 years ago.

The dirtiest do nothing people were the ones you were told to trust. Think about that before accusing me of being the deep state bad guy like you always do.

What made me do an about face from Q was many things but the gamification of it and WWGWAG, ThanQ, Qsentme-- is a technique to make everyone feel all cozy and special like they were the news and bread makers. 8chan isn't special. Everyone researches, everyone finds news else where. Think back to Snowden or WikiLeaks. They did drops and boom it is done, it was ALL there. No riddles and BS gamification to make you feel important and waste so much time bread making.

The, 'want to play a game' was from an old movie. They appealed to you by making you think they were currently billy badass. I was going to post the link that breaks down how Q is leftists pulling a pied piper psy op but you won't read it.

There aint no good guy there ain't no bad guy, there's only you and me and we just disagree.

Disclaimer: there very well may be huge human trafficking busts. I hope to God there is. But I believe it was announced as an initiative way before Q. We all always suspected it with hollywood and pedo island.

quote:

---

What will he be admitting to? That he's skeptical that powerful people will be held accountable for their actions?

frick, we all should be skeptical.

---

quote:

---

You sure do seem to like to jump to conclusions without the proper amount of evidence.

I've been team Q since day 1, and that hasn't changed; however, I'm also objective enough to realize that what we have, as far as evidence proving that Q is a decision making insider focused on dropping the hammer, wouldn't even meet the lowest legal burden in a civil case: preponderance of the evidence.

And those frickers did tell me to stay out of that thread. They like yall coddled; I like yall prepared to defend your conclusions. I like yall realizing when there are holes in your arguments, which do not allow for a logical defense, so you could learn to respond to logical people with "I cant really answer that" instead of dumb, illogical bullshite. And, since outsiders weren't allowed to truly question anything past a post or three, an insider had to do it.

The funniest part was a poster (maybe vox) later making a comment about how a twitter user might have been sounding anti-Q in order to facilitate good "Q proof" type discussions. I laughed, because nobody seemed to notice that I had been showing anti Q type sentiment, for like a year, for the same purpose.

Further, it is shite or get off the pot time. frick their plan if their plan had them truly starting the rollout during an election year. frick their plan if they were going to give this media the opportunity to use that "politically motivated" during an election year bullshite excuse. And, if it's all true, we have a bit of say in the timing. We could have pushed the time table if we screamed loud enough; pushed it if enough were getting impatient.

You have fun trying to get your life wins on an internet message board though. On the grand scheme of things, id rather us be your opportunity for your "life wins" than an innocent wife, child, or the 7/11 employees.

Keep it up in the Q thread though. You guys are doing great. I don't keep up much lately, but their seems to be a lot less fringe shite, and the more knowledgable folks have taken the reins.

And chill the frick out with the crow eating bullshite. It doesnt, and wont, help. You're just speculating one way, while they speculate the other. I go you're way with my speculating, but I can definitely see their pov too. In the past, weve been the goofy fricker trying to get the dollar on the insurance commercial, as far as justice for our elite is concerned.

---

The fact that your posts were deleted and you were kicked out of the Q thread says no one can discuss or question. I guess that thread is for them only and that's fine. I am glad that there is currently another thread where there is discussion and I hope it continues in facts and kindness that we are on the same team minus the progs.