Started By
Message

re: Bombshell - DNC Lawyers Met with FBI on Dossier before Surveillance Warrant

Posted on 10/4/18 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6733 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Kav might have been the clincher. If you go back to the odd questioning of Kav by Graham, then Baker now realizes that he will get no court protection, with Kav being the deciding vot
Can you explain please. Tia
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162831 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 9:55 am to
Chad Pergram
?Verified account @ChadPergram

Colleague Catherine Herridge rpts sources familiar with Congressional investigation tell Fox that a lawyer for DNC/Clinton campaign was the previously unknown source providing evidence to the FBI Russia probe in ‘16 as FBI/DOJ drafted surveillance warrant for Carter Page.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84671 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Colleague Catherine Herridge rpts sources familiar with Congressional investigation tell Fox that a lawyer for DNC/Clinton campaign was the previously unknown source providing evidence to the FBI Russia probe in ‘16 as FBI/DOJ drafted surveillance warrant for Carter Page.

Rexcatur loves this type of action.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141476 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 9:59 am to
I am convinced Obama knee about this.

That’s why Susan Rice sent her famous email to herself.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162831 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:02 am to
the Clinton campaign/DNC colluding with the eff bee eye to set up her political opponent, which could not have been done without Obama's help.

nothing to see here just sedition and political espionage and abuse of power, move along.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33359 posts
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Can you explain please.

Graham zeroed in on people losing their constitutional rights if that have been found to have collaborated with an enemy. Kav agreed that that was the case, and cited from memory the citations supporting his assertion.

So when it appears that Kav has weathered the storm, a potentially conservative court could ultimately deny appeals for citizens working with Russians to stop/remove Trump

And the next thing we hear is FBI attorney Baker wants immunity. And is dropping bombshells
quote:

Graham: So the bottom line is on every American citizen know you have constitutional rights, but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy. There is a body of law well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed conflict. Do you understand those difference?

Kavanaugh: I do understand that there are different bodies of law of course, senator.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram