Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Ballots: Mail-out & Mail-in vs Easy Absentee vs Normal Absentee

Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:53 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:53 pm


vs




EDIT: Here is a good summary of the virus-related mail-in changes, by State.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:25 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69289 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:53 pm to
Hank, you’re a turd
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79069 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Hank, you’re a turd



Seconded
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16410 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:54 pm to
Can anyone give a coherent argument on how mail out then mail in ballots don’t have the high potential for fraud?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Can anyone give a coherent argument on how mail out then mail in ballots don’t have the high potential for fraud?
I think that the likelihood of fraud under that regimen is near-certain.

But the states following that regimen all voted Blue last time anyway, with the exception of Utah and Montana. It would take truly MASSIVE fraud to flip either of those states, but let's assume that they succeed there. Are those nine EC votes likely to be significant?

So, the massive "mail-out, mail-in" argument appears to be largely a red herring, from the perspective of having any material influence upon the Electoral College. I posted the OP without commentary, just to see whether anyone would be able to read (and understand the implications of) the maps.

The battleground CLEARLY lies in the "Easy Absentee" regimen.

So the question to ask is "How susceptible to fraud is THAT regimen?" What are the safeguards in place to be certain that ballots are only being sent to actual voters? Etcetera?
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:32 pm
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1645 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

I think that the likelihood of fraud under that regimen is near-certain. But the states following that regimen all voted Blue last time anyway, with the exception of Utah and Montana. It would take truly MASSIVE fraud to flip either of those states, but let's assume that they succeed there. Are those nine EC votes likely to be significant?


Wait, so your argument is that there is absolutely fraud in those states using that system, but it doesn’t matter because it is unlikely that there is enough fraud to flip the states? And even if it did, it would be significant because it’s not many EC votes?

Shouldn’t fraud not be tolerated no matter the outcome or form? This is a legit crazy stance to take.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9596 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:07 pm to
I think the mail in only is gonna hurt dems in Colorado in Nevada. Can they also vote in person?
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:10 pm to
If Bill Barr says it’s a serious issue then it’s a serious issue
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:11 pm
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26781 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Can they also vote in person?


Sure, as many times as they'd like.

quote:

I think the mail in only is gonna hurt dems in Colorado in Nevada


Why? Because dems too dumb to know how to mail (yet another republican voter suppression tactic) or will the post office know which envelopes contain democrat votes and lose them?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Wait, so your argument is ....
No.

My point is that people are losing their shite about the WRONG form of mail-in voting. Mass mail-out/mail-in is sure to result in fraud, but it will likely make no difference in the Electoral results.

It is like screaming "The Dems Cheated in California!" Yeah, probably. But they would have won California anyway.

We should be focusing upon the regimen which may ACTUALLY influence the election ... absentee voting with loosened rules.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:18 pm
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10287 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:14 pm to
AH
Fraud potential not withstanding , the average lost mail when sent is 3% . Now if ballots sent out are 3% of voters rights loss and then the ones that are received ( if all addressee’s were at their last know address, highly doubtful) then that is another 3 % disenfranchised voters . When you start to calculate all the late , incorrectly filled and ballots delivered to addresses of transient voters ( people that are constantly moving for work , renters or whatever ) how could anyone believe that a actual election could be had ?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131368 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:19 pm to
you don't think they will "find" enough mail in ballots to bring FL, OH, or GA into play 3 weeks after the election?

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Hank, you’re a turd
Would you care to elaborate, as to these two maps ... as opposed to the usual high-brow comments regarding my parentage, personal grooming, sexual preferences &/or failure to maintain a tidy work area?
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 9:26 pm
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9596 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

Why? Because dems too dumb to know how to mail
yes. I think less ppl will vote if you have to mail in something and not mess up for it to count. Less votes always favors republicans.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32889 posts
Posted on 9/2/20 at 10:58 pm to
quote:


you don't think they will "find" enough mail in ballots to bring FL, OH, or GA into play 3 weeks after the election?

Absolutely. PA as well.
This post was edited on 9/2/20 at 10:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram