Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

AZ update: Reviewing Thousands of Ballots Where Machines Did Not Detect Vote for President

Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:32 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55659 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:32 am
quote:

“There were over 33,000 undervotes,” Bennett told The Western Journal. “There may be, you know, a certain number of people that didn’t want to vote for [Democrat Joe] Biden or [Republican Donald] Trump or [Libertarian Jo] Jorgensen or anyone else, so they may, in fact, be undervotes.”

“But if someone circled their oval or made a check next to it or did something other than get pixels of blackness inside the oval, almost one percent of the 3.4 million people that voted in Arizona, the machines did not record any vote for president,” he added.

“If we find some people that circled their oval or made a checkmark next to it, not every one of those is probably going to be for Trump or not every one is going to be for Biden. So will it make a difference in the outcome? Maybe, maybe not.”




Again, doing the things that need to be done.


quote:

According to the Maricopa County recorder’s office, the number of undervotes in November’s election was 8,475 within its jurisdiction.



quote:

Maricopa County, which encompasses the Phoenix metropolitan area, makes up over 60 percent of the state’s population, but apparently only accounted for about 25 percent of the over 33,000 undervote ballots.


quote:

I mean, this is a race that was decided by three tenths of one percent. And so you would probably want to make sure that the election department had done a perfect job seeing if all the votes were counted, especially when one percent of the ballots supposedly weren’t counted for any ballot for president by the machines.”



LINK

Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:34 am to
Wouldn't get my hopes up too much on this. Those circling or checking next to the ovals to be filled in are likely dim voters.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97012 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:35 am to
quote:

“There were over 33,000 undervotes,” Bennett told The Western Journal.


Is that state-wide I'm assuming?

Because he goes on to say there were only 8,500 within Maricopa.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26295 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:37 am to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77693 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:39 am to
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24847 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 12:14 pm to
It would be entertaining to see the undervotes break significantly enough for Trump to flip the race.

Watching the "count every vote" crowd bend themselves into a pretzel to work around that would be awesome.
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20877 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 12:18 pm to
Entire audit is becoming a joke with the time it is taking and the fact that a fraud of a million votes is not going to change anything.
The RINO state legislatures should have dealt with this situation last November. Too late now.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55659 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Entire audit is becoming a joke with the time it is taking and the fact that a fraud of a million votes is not going to change anything.



Just because you ignore law, doesn't = your outcome.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75383 posts
Posted on 6/23/21 at 12:34 pm to
I don't think he means literally a check mark or circle, it could also be the already documented case of poll workers making them use sharpies which won't scan, and then during curing, the crooked curers only cured the downvotes. One can only find out by looking at the ballots.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram