Started By
Message

As of this upcoming monday, the durham investigation will surpass meuller probe in length

Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:17 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:17 pm
Which begs the question.....what the frick is he doing? Is he controlled opposition? Biden is asking him to stay on and do nothing for years so biden can turn around and say "look how honorable I was letting durham stay on".

because mueller team had numerous high profile press conferences, scary-sounding indicments, armed arrests of roger stone, etc.

durham team sitting on its arse.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15713 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:22 pm to
I honestly forgot that was still going on.

What the hell is he doing?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:26 pm to
He had access to what Brennan and Comey did regarding all the intelligence coming in on "muh Russians", and it was a lot more than Paul Manafort sending encrypted messages to Kilimnik.

Brennan knew there was more there and he and Comey put Steele and Misfud running at Pap as the predicates for the FISA app as a parallel construction to get their warrant. What is Durham seeing that is preventing him from indicting? Even John Ratcliffe was protecting Trump with "muh sources and methods"

quote:

“There are other documents that I’ve provided to the special counsel that can’t be declassified because they might prejudice his investigation, and those documents that still have sources and methods that can’t be declassified at any point in time,” he explained.


LINK

and here are your "source[s] and methods that can't be declassified at any point in time" per John Ratcliffe: LINK
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:05 pm
Posted by LChama
Member since May 2020
1651 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:26 pm to
Swamp creature
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:29 pm to
I think Durham despised that trump was constantly tweeting about his probe
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:32 pm to
I think that is wholly non-responsive.

If this entire thing is as ironclad as liquor salesman Rebel and mortgage huckster SDV Tiger says, even a hack lawyer like myself could get an indictment.

The only reason the esteemed John Durham appointed by the esteemed Bill Barr (and maintained by the honorable Joe Biden) hasn't indicted is because there is a lot more there than is publicly "there".
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:05 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:41 pm to
Nah.

John Durham has had 2 years

Mueller was charging people left and right every 5 months

Durham isn’t doing Jack right now.

Investigations do not END with indictments. By law, it is required that indictments are passed down as a probe goes on.

You can’t investigate for 2+ years and then at the very end unseal all the charges of everyone involved. That’s not how it works
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 10:42 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

John Durham has had 2 years

Mueller was charging people left and right every 5 months

Durham isn’t doing Jack right now.

Investigations do not END with indictments. By law, it is required that indictments are passed down as a probe goes on.

You can’t investigate for 2+ years and then at the very end unseal all the charges of everyone involved. That’s not how it works




You're making my point for me. Durham hasn't even found a process crime on Comey or Brennan.

He got Clinesmith on a lie trying to make Steele a thing. Steele isn't a thing for the higher-level dudes because they knew much more than Clinesmith did and we do now.

Durham had carte blanche with Barr and Trump for nearly two years and did nothing. Because he couldn't maintain an indictment without Brennan dropping BOMBSSSSS
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 10:47 pm
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

What the hell is he doing?


Without a doubt in my mind, he is:
1. Making (not earning) an easy paycheck;
2. Leveraging his position to have DC insiders kiss his arse everywhere he goes;
3. Using the investigation budget as a piggy bank for travel, high $$ dinners, and resort hotel stays.

That’s it. It must be nice to be a swamp rat. In an age when pride and integrity are the punchlines of political jokes, it’s a comfortable living.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:47 pm to
So why isn’t Durham ending this shitshow?
Why did he let barr appoint him as special counsel last year
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

So why isn’t Durham ending this shitshow? Why did he let barr appoint him as special counsel last year


[See the post immediately above this one.]
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:52 pm to
Why would he tell Barr and Trump their wishcasting came up empty? Run down every lead and do a thorough investigation.

Trump wins and you quietly let Barr know but you didn't affect an election. They find a way to let it go quietly. Biden wins and he has to keep you on and you tell him there's nothing there.

But again, if the entire universe of knowledge Brennan and Comey had is the same as we have, indictments should be easy, right? So is it very far-fetched to think the director of the CIA and the director of the FBI had more information at their disposal than the liquor salesman Rebel and the mortgage huckster SDVTiger?
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 10:53 pm
Posted by pigskinGod
Member since Sep 2020
1573 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

boosiebadazz

what are your reasons for supporting democrats? Does all the hypocrisy and media covering for them 24/7 doing shite much worse than Trump could ever dream of not turn you off in the least bit? I couldnt imagine being a somewhat intelligent person and supporting those absolute pieces of shite.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:03 pm to
I don't support Democrats. I'm not pro-life, but that's about my only "absolute" position that aligns with Dems.

I'm a GOPe Republican except that Trump was right about China being our biggest threat. But I also think Trump is a charlatan who found a wave a rode it (tremendously). He's not a leader, or a deep thinker, or someone to follow or even emulate as a husband or a father. He's actually incredibly vapid, shallow and narcissistic but he knows the language to speak to aggrieved, blue- collar whites and that's done wonders for him here recently.

I wish a lot of you would take some of the good he espoused, mainly about China, and disassociate it from the man himself. We'd all be better for it.

Before we get Medicare for All and the Green New Deal because Republicans are infighting over Donald fricking Trump.
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:08 pm
Posted by beauxgy
LA
Member since Feb 2007
3461 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:11 pm to
So, a spineless, confused rino, sellout?

"Husband and father", lol, you are a bullshiating , Glen beckian, hypocritical turd.
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:15 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

a spineless


Not really. I just articulated my thoughts knowing it would not be the popular position here. See your sophomoric response

quote:

confused rino


Again, I spelled out specific reasons so not really confused. RINO is a new thing you coined when you decided you'd follow Donald Trump off a cliff, or defend him shooting someone on Fifth Avenue, or back him claiming fraud in an election he lost solely because his fragile ego couldn't handle a loss. Same reason he alleged fraud when Ted Cruz beat him in the 2016 Iowa primary and he preemptively alleged fraud in the 2016 general versus Hilary.

quote:

sellout


Not at all. You left me because you're weak and you needed the faux machismo Don Trump with the laughable power tie to save you from the browns and the world changing around you when you're wholly unprepared to adapt to it.
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:21 pm
Posted by BMeaux
Pensacola, FL
Member since Aug 2008
114 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:26 pm to
The Swamp getting Swampier!
Posted by beauxgy
LA
Member since Feb 2007
3461 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:32 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/23/21 at 6:53 am
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80229 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:39 pm to
That's barely a discernible thought.

When you herniate that disc doing manual labor, call me. Us cuck lawyers have taken that into account given your lack of education and dearth of transferable skills and I can help you with your disability claim. Or you can learn to code.
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 11:41 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69297 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 12:03 am to
Boosie, just wanted to let you know that you are one of my favorite posters on here. And have been for quite a while.

It appears I’m back on the board’s shite list. I don’t care

I’ll stick up for you
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram