- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alex Stein confronts armed antifa guarding drag queen story time in Denton, TX
Posted on 11/21/22 at 7:58 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 11/21/22 at 7:58 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No, it isn't the same argument.
But you implied it was.
1
Posted on 11/21/22 at 7:59 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Democrats love this type of argument, especially when they're trying to push more gun control.
So now Hank's boyfriend has entered the thread, spouting nonsense in an attempt to deflect criticism from his Pedo-lover....predictable....
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:00 am to minister of truth
quote:Absent harm to the child, yes. The sticky point is how one defines “harm.”
So you think there is no societal/moral limits on what a child can do or be exposed to if the parents agree to it?
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child. Obviously, some posters on this forum feel differently.
quote:Nudists/naturists do so all the time, and I see that as being ABSOLUTELY none of the State’s business.
So according to your argument if a parent thinks it's ok for his/her child to be exposed to an adult's genitalia then the "state" should allow it?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:01 am to oogabooga68
now that you mention it, displaced does seem to often rush in protect Aggiehank
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
There is absolutely no evidence of even one instance in which a child has been subjected to any sort of physical harm at one of these storytime events.
Is physical harm where you draw the line on abuse?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:03 am to minister of truth
quote:
now that you mention it, displaced does seem to often rush in protect Aggiehank
They are either lovers trolling from Mommy's basement, or they are lunatics on the same floor of some Psych-ward.
Either way, they are proving they should NEVER be allowed around children.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:03 am to minister of truth
quote:
now that you mention it, displaced does seem to often rush in protect Aggiehank
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Nudists/naturists do so all the time, and I see that as being ABSOLUTELY none of the State’s business.
Wow, so Drag Queens and nudists are the same in your mind?
Tell me you know nothing about Drag without telling me you know nothing about Drag.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The sticky point is how one defines “harm.”
No shite. Your idea of "harm" may vary greatly from society's. You initially only expressed concern about "physical" harm. So if the parents are ok with ritual animal sacrifice in the town square, you would be ok with children being exposed to that? Public hangings? As long as the children aren't being "physically harmed"?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child.
Monty Python was quite famous for showing men wearing dresses.
Drag and Monty Python may share *some* similar traits, but modern Drag IS SEXUAL IN NATURE,PERIOD, END OF STORY.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:06 am to minister of truth
quote:when one is talking about the use of the coercive power of the state to override parental choices in raising their own children, yes, I think you need some sort of objective standard (like physical harm) rather than the subjective views of one segment of society.
So "physical harm" is the only criteria we should consider?
Is it in evitable that some children will be harmed if the State stays out of parenting? Of course. Just as it is inevitable, that some children will be harmed of parents were allowed to let the children ride bicycles without helmets or to climb trees without rope/tackle and safety nets (which I also believe should be the parents’ choice).
You think that listening to ruPaul read a story does severe lasting harm to a child. I do not. It is my view that the State should not enforce your view upon me. This really is not a complex issue.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:08 am to TrueTiger
Primetime 99
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I see absolutely no evidence that seeing a man in a dress causes any “harm” to a child.
Like a moth to a flame, you seem to find yourself in all the grooming and kid diddling threads don't you...
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:08 am to oogabooga68
quote:Again, there is no evidence of even one single instance in which this has happened.
Yes, because when these creeps abuse a child, it is in a Library....in front of everyone, not afterwards behind closed doors
You are interfering with parental rights to make decisions regarding their own children, out of fear of grumpkins and snarks.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:10 am to oogabooga68
quote:No, I was responding to a specific question asked by another poster about nudity.
Wow, so Drag Queens and nudists are the same in your mind?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You think that listening to ruPaul read a story does severe lasting harm to a child. I do not. It is my view that the State should not enforce your view upon me. This really is not a complex issue.
So now you're a psychologist as well as the board attorney. So you think all parents have the ability to make sound/moral decisions that are best for their children? Do you think they're perhaps millions of parents who have psychological/psychiatric issues that prevent them from making sound/moral decisions that are best for their children?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:11 am to AggieHank86
quote:
when one is talking about the use of the coercive power of the state to override parental choices in raising their own children, yes, I think you need some sort of objective standard (like physical harm) rather than the subjective views of one segment of society.
Then you haven’t read the Texas family code recently. Emotional harm is all over the abuse/neglect statutes. I’m not saying a drag reading reaches that level, but I’m surprised a Texas family law attorney wouldn’t know the family code.
My concern isn’t you defending drag readings to kids, as strange as that is…it the erratic behavior in this thread you don’t usually show in other threads. You have compared taking communion and going to bible study as equally “crazy” as taking a child to be taught by a drag Queen. These are objectively wild comparisons and any rational person would be able to see that. For some reason this topic makes you irrational. Not sure why. Maybe it’s the combo of drag support and a hatred of religion?
This post was edited on 11/21/22 at 8:13 am
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:12 am to minister of truth
quote:You are describing Santeria. If Santeria happens to be a family’s religion, yes, that is absolutely not any of the State’s business.
So if the parents are ok with ritual animal sacrifice in the town square, you would be ok with children being exposed to that?
quote:No, I do not oppose public hangings. I think they might have some deterrent effect.
Public hangings?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I think they might have some deterrent effect.
Do you think Pedophilia should be a capital crime?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 8:15 am to The Maj
quote:I am certainly drawn to the threads in which the underlying issue is the use of coercive state power to override individual freedoms.
you seem to find yourself in all the grooming and kid diddling threads don't you...
For whatever reason, that issue seems to arise most often on this forum in the context of drag storytime. That really says more about you people than about me.
But I am not going to back away from the broader principle, just because this particular application makes some people uncomfortable.
This post was edited on 11/21/22 at 8:16 am
Page 7 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News