
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AI is identifying more billable conditions, not sicker patients
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:23 pm
Paxton Launches Investigation Into Blue Cross Blue Shield Over Alleged Delays and Denials of Urgent Care as AI Healthcare “Arms Race” Drives Costs Higher
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis also weighed in, according to the statement provided for this report:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/paxton-launches-investigation-blue-cross-blue-shield-alleged/
quote:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday that his office has launched an investigation into Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas over allegations that the insurer denied or delayed urgent and medically necessary care, as a separate national debate intensifies over the use of artificial intelligence by both hospitals and insurance companies.
According to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, the investigation covers Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, its parent company Health Care Service Corporation, and related entities. Investigators are examining the companies’ claim-review procedures and prior-authorization requirements.
Paxton’s office said it had received reports alleging that medically necessary or urgent procedures were delayed or denied.
Healthcare industry reporting indicates that insurers are also deploying artificial intelligence to scrutinize medical charts and challenge claims.
McLaren Health Care’s chief financial officer recently said insurers use AI to scan records for claims they can deny while hospitals examine those same records to maximize reimbursement.
“All the insurers are using A.I. to scan our charts to look for claims to deny. For the same reason, we’re looking at the same charts today,” Dave Mazurkiewicz, the CFO of McLaren Health Care, told the NY Times.
That developing technological arms race has created a striking dynamic: hospitals can deploy algorithms to identify diagnoses that generate higher reimbursement, while insurers can use their own automated tools to challenge whether those claims should be paid.
Hedgie Markets summarized the controversy on X, arguing that patients ultimately bear the financial consequences through premiums and other healthcare costs.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis also weighed in, according to the statement provided for this report:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/paxton-launches-investigation-blue-cross-blue-shield-alleged/
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:33 pm to Ailsa
You can set AI up to do anything you want it to do within reason. Which is why it is truthfully said that the defense against AI is better AI. In this case, use AI to expose the fraud being perpetrated by the people using AI to cheat the system. It is impossibly good at data analysis.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:35 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You can set AI up to do anything you want it to do within reason. Which is why it is truthfully said that the defense against AI is better AI. In this case, use AI to expose the fraud being perpetrated by the people using AI to cheat the system. It is impossibly good at data analysis.
That and not being lazy and taking the easy road by assuming everything output by AI is golden (which lots of people do...and assuming corporations that are run by those same retards do as well)
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:38 pm to gaetti15
quote:
That and not being lazy and taking the easy road by assuming everything output by AI is golden (which lot's of people do...and assuming corporations that are run by those same retards do as well)
Right. The push right now is to use AI swarms to develop logic and reasoning chains. A lot of its mistakes can be programmed out of it if you take care to do so on the back end. I'm tinkering with this myself actually and it's been pretty illuminating so far. What I was probably most surprised by is just how often AI makes mistakes. And not just hallucination type mistakes either. But just forgetting shite it shouldn't forget.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:41 pm to Ailsa
This is nothing new despite AI now being involved. Hospitals have always tried to overcharge while insurance companies have always tried to deny as much as possible. I work for an insurance company and we have an entire department dedicated to medical bill review to combat it.
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:45 pm to BoarEd
quote:
What I was probably most surprised by is just how often AI makes mistakes. And not just hallucination type mistakes either. But just forgetting shite it shouldn't forget.
oh yeah.
See these AIs that are being used to solve millennium problems, unsolved math/physics problems? They are not the shite that's publicly available...or even available in situations like this with insurance/hospitals. Those models also have HIGH level folks prompting them for information too.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:50 pm to gaetti15
Use a public access model AI to do some coding and you'll see how prone it is to making mistakes. It's still extremely good though and light years better than I would ever be, but they'll make mistakes frequently enough. You also get a better idea for how they actually "think." They absolutely do think. Just not how we understand it I don't think. I've seen them many times spit out responses like, "let's run this script here" ... "Actually, on second thought, I have a better idea. Let's run this instead."
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:55 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Use a public access model AI to do some coding and you'll see how prone it is to making mistakes. It's still extremely good though and light years better than I would ever be, but they'll make mistakes frequently enough. You also get a better idea for how they actually "think." They absolutely do think. Just not how we understand it I don't think. I've seen them many times spit out responses like, "let's run this script here" ... "Actually, on second thought, I have a better idea. Let's run this instead."
100%
Posted on 9/28/26 at 4:57 pm to gaetti15
Read the entire frickin response before you do what it says. 
Posted on 9/28/26 at 5:24 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It is impossibly good at data analysis.
So it’s not good?

Popular
Back to top

2









