- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Absolute MELT as Green Card Applications must now be made from Home Country
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:48 am
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:48 am
The era of Visa abuse is coming to an end.
"An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply.
This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.
The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over."
"An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply.
This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.
The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over."
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:48 am to CastleBravo
Tons of insane seething on X about this. Lots of foreigners upset they cant scam and game the immigration system anymore.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:56 am to CastleBravo
Finally. This is how it used to be until
ChatGPT
quote:
the 1952 Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which created Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA 245”). This established the modern concept of “adjustment of status,” allowing certain eligible non-citizens already physically present in the U.S. to become lawful permanent residents without leaving the country for consular processing abroad.
Before that:
Immigrants generally had to leave the U.S. and obtain an immigrant visa at a U.S. consulate abroad before re-entering as permanent residents.
In the 1930s–1940s, there was an awkward workaround called “pre-examination,” where someone in the U.S. would first get screened domestically, then briefly travel to Canada or another nearby country for visa issuance, then re-enter.
Important nuance:
The 1952 law did not mean everyone could adjust status from within the U.S.
Originally, it mainly applied to people who had entered legally and maintained lawful status.
Congress later expanded and modified eligibility several times, especially through:
A.1960 amendments,
B. the 1994 creation of INA §245(i),
and
C. the 2000 LIFE Act extension.
ChatGPT
Posted on 5/23/26 at 4:05 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Tons of insane seething on X about this. Lots of foreigners upset they cant scam and game the immigration system anymore.
Tell them this rule was made for me not for thee. Sorry.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:47 am to jizzle6609
quote:
Tell them this rule was made for me not for thee. Sorry.
Or, elections have consequences.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:15 am to tiggerthetooth
frick them with a cactus.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:18 am to CastleBravo
quote:
allowing certain eligible non-citizens already physically present in the U.S.
So a bunch of folk just abused this statement. I'm sure it's going to the courts.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:23 am to CastleBravo
With anywhere from 30 to 40 million Illegal Immigrants in this country why do we need any immigration at this point? Seems we have enough here already do we not?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:28 am to CastleBravo
If the country isn’t careful Trump may right the ship in 4 years. Immigration, voting, science, economy and next up deficit. Come on democrats put those big boy pants on and join in
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:28 am to CastleBravo
They should do this with immigration hearings and appeals as well. Have them be heard at the embassy or consulate of their home.country (or closest "safe" country for bullshite asylum claims).
That way, if denied, you just kick their asses out the back door. No transportation costs for deportation.
That way, if denied, you just kick their asses out the back door. No transportation costs for deportation.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:30 am to Gee Grenouille
quote:
So a bunch of folk just abused this statement. I'm sure it's going to the courts.
This is an article 2 responsibility. The executive branch runs immigration. Nowhere in the Constitution does the Judicial have any say so about it. It will go to court but it is yuge overreach to even be heard.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:51 am to udtiger
quote:
They should do this with immigration hearings and appeals as well. Have them be heard at the embassy or consulate of their home.country (or closest "safe" country for bullshite asylum claims).
That way, if denied, you just kick their asses out the back door. No transportation costs for deportation.
That is what they do here in Trinidad. You also have to show them a bank statement and job letter from here so they know you arent doing it just to get in the country and live off social programs. And if denied the US keeps your 185 dollar application fee.
I had to go to the embassy a few times and you hear the people in line saying "I dont know why I have to go through this shat I can just fly to Mexico and walk across"......and you know that was true, very sad, but true.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:55 am to CastleBravo
quote:
Green Card
Their ticket to get some of that U.S. green.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:01 am to Hangit
quote:
This is an article 2 responsibility. The executive branch runs immigration. Nowhere in the Constitution does the Judicial have any say so about it. It will go to court but it is yuge overreach to even be heard.
I disagree. The courts are there to adjudicate oversteps just like this. See: Callais where SCOTUS not only overruled part of the Voting Rights Act but also its own lower court whose ignorant ruling caused Callais to happen in the first place.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:22 am to CastleBravo
Starting to function like most of the countries in the world would handle this.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:23 am to CastleBravo
This is actually helpful. Expect Jeffries to go into a spittle flying rage.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:25 am to Penrod
quote:
Or, elections have consequences
Did AOC go to the border again in solidarity with these folks?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:28 am to CastleBravo
How did they close the loophole if they were passed by congress per another posters search? This would be great but I'd expect a legal challenge that goes for awhile.
Popular
Back to top

12







