Started By
Message

Absolute MELT as Green Card Applications must now be made from Home Country

Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:48 am
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
2024 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 1:48 am
The era of Visa abuse is coming to an end.

"An alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply.

This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes.

The era of abusing our nation’s immigration system is over."

Posted by BeefSupreme
Metairie
Member since Sep 2016
692 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:26 am to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64491 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:48 am to
Tons of insane seething on X about this. Lots of foreigners upset they cant scam and game the immigration system anymore.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52395 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 2:56 am to
Finally. This is how it used to be until
quote:

the 1952 Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which created Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA 245”). This established the modern concept of “adjustment of status,” allowing certain eligible non-citizens already physically present in the U.S. to become lawful permanent residents without leaving the country for consular processing abroad.

Before that:

Immigrants generally had to leave the U.S. and obtain an immigrant visa at a U.S. consulate abroad before re-entering as permanent residents.
In the 1930s–1940s, there was an awkward workaround called “pre-examination,” where someone in the U.S. would first get screened domestically, then briefly travel to Canada or another nearby country for visa issuance, then re-enter.

Important nuance:

The 1952 law did not mean everyone could adjust status from within the U.S.

Originally, it mainly applied to people who had entered legally and maintained lawful status.

Congress later expanded and modified eligibility several times, especially through:

A.1960 amendments,
B. the 1994 creation of INA §245(i),
and
C. the 2000 LIFE Act extension.



ChatGPT
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11468 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 3:38 am to
I voted for this!!!
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20798 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 4:05 am to
quote:

Tons of insane seething on X about this. Lots of foreigners upset they cant scam and game the immigration system anymore.


Tell them this rule was made for me not for thee. Sorry.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57000 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Tell them this rule was made for me not for thee. Sorry.

Or, elections have consequences.
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19948 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:15 am to
frick them with a cactus.
Posted by Gee Grenouille
Member since Jul 2018
8361 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:18 am to
quote:

allowing certain eligible non-citizens already physically present in the U.S.


So a bunch of folk just abused this statement. I'm sure it's going to the courts.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12837 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:23 am to
With anywhere from 30 to 40 million Illegal Immigrants in this country why do we need any immigration at this point? Seems we have enough here already do we not?
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
20103 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:28 am to
If the country isn’t careful Trump may right the ship in 4 years. Immigration, voting, science, economy and next up deficit. Come on democrats put those big boy pants on and join in
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116485 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:28 am to
They should do this with immigration hearings and appeals as well. Have them be heard at the embassy or consulate of their home.country (or closest "safe" country for bullshite asylum claims).

That way, if denied, you just kick their asses out the back door. No transportation costs for deportation.
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47325 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:30 am to
quote:

So a bunch of folk just abused this statement. I'm sure it's going to the courts.


This is an article 2 responsibility. The executive branch runs immigration. Nowhere in the Constitution does the Judicial have any say so about it. It will go to court but it is yuge overreach to even be heard.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20475 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

They should do this with immigration hearings and appeals as well. Have them be heard at the embassy or consulate of their home.country (or closest "safe" country for bullshite asylum claims).

That way, if denied, you just kick their asses out the back door. No transportation costs for deportation.


That is what they do here in Trinidad. You also have to show them a bank statement and job letter from here so they know you arent doing it just to get in the country and live off social programs. And if denied the US keeps your 185 dollar application fee.

I had to go to the embassy a few times and you hear the people in line saying "I dont know why I have to go through this shat I can just fly to Mexico and walk across"......and you know that was true, very sad, but true.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
27153 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Green Card


Their ticket to get some of that U.S. green.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59882 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:01 am to
quote:

This is an article 2 responsibility. The executive branch runs immigration. Nowhere in the Constitution does the Judicial have any say so about it. It will go to court but it is yuge overreach to even be heard.


I disagree. The courts are there to adjudicate oversteps just like this. See: Callais where SCOTUS not only overruled part of the Voting Rights Act but also its own lower court whose ignorant ruling caused Callais to happen in the first place.
Posted by wareagle7298
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2013
3731 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:22 am to
Starting to function like most of the countries in the world would handle this.
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
28042 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:23 am to
This is actually helpful. Expect Jeffries to go into a spittle flying rage.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20798 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Or, elections have consequences


Did AOC go to the border again in solidarity with these folks?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80659 posts
Posted on 5/23/26 at 8:28 am to
How did they close the loophole if they were passed by congress per another posters search? This would be great but I'd expect a legal challenge that goes for awhile.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram