- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:15 pm to mattloc
quote:
The fact that most won’t admit to this exposes the unhealthy effect of peer pressure on scientific discourse.”
Scientist answer: it's inferred
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Biblical fantasy.
Bottlenecks aren't fantasy, though...
Even more reason for bammers to love it
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:19 pm to Duke
Most importantly, carbon based implies we can still frick it.
One day my great great great great great great great grandson will plant his pole into a three titted 4 orificed hot Technicolored space babe.
Pride of humanity that.
One day my great great great great great great great grandson will plant his pole into a three titted 4 orificed hot Technicolored space babe.
Pride of humanity that.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:23 pm to Vecchio Cane
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:31 pm to Lg
quote:
Well the Mars rover went on walk about and I don't think we saw anything jumping around in front of it trying to figure out what it was.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:32 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Proof?
the Biblical fantasy.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:43 pm to tarzana
quote:
Now we have full understanding of these things, and yet macroevolution is still perplexing. No one has ever seen one creature evolve into something else, nor will they.
Umm.... Kent, is that you?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:47 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Proof?
Proof that The Last Jedi isn't a Mormon account of history?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:48 pm to Fun Bunch
Though I was looking forward to challenging CivilTiger and his microevolution with reptilian genome characteristics of the platypus. 
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:When you make a definitive statement i.e., "the Biblical fantasy" it's up to you to prove your assertion. Get as cute as you want with questions of faith. But you are not entitled to your own set of facts. Of course there is no present dispositive regarding creation. Your assertions of God being "fantasy" notwithstanding.
Proof that The Last Jedi isn't a Mormon account of history?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:54 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Though I was looking forward to challenging CivilTiger and his microevolution with reptilian genome characteristics of the platypus
Is he completely unaware of what Monotremes are?
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:55 pm to blackrose890
quote:They don't look like reptiles tho
Monotremes
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:56 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
When you make a definitive statement
It's a good thing I didn't do that.
quote:
But you are not entitled to your own set of facts.
Oh, but I am. That's why you're still able to have your childhood fantasy as an adult. It's great, isn't it?
quote:
Your assertions of God being "fantasy" notwithstanding.
That isn't the claim that I made.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 4:59 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
When you make a definitive statement i.e., "the Biblical fantasy" it's up to you to prove your assertion. Get as cute as you want with questions of faith. But you are not entitled to your own set of facts. Of course there is no present dispositive regarding creation. Your assertions of God being "fantasy" notwithstanding.
The (valid) positive evidence also doesn't exist for a magical creation (I don't have a better description) either, rather there is a point where we cannot currently know what has happened. Could it be that the universe was put forward by the mechanism of the Big Bang and that is God? possible, but given that we explanations for other biblical phenomena and have dispositive evidence for others, it would almost seem to be an onus probandi to declare that anyone must disprove creation.
Edit: at this point both communities need to step back and find positive evidence for each of their models and examine them. Religion and science have the tendency to jump to name calling for no reason.
This post was edited on 2/12/19 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:00 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:"the Biblical fantasy" says otherwise.
It's a good thing I didn't do that.
Again, I have no problem calling anyone to question if they push God of the gaps as fact. But the reverse stands to reason as well. We don't know what we don't know. Presingularity pretexts rest firmly in that realm.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
"the Biblical fantasy" says otherwise.
No it doesn't.
I know that you know the difference between a comment and an assertion.
quote:
Again, I have no problem calling anyone to question if they push God of the gaps as fact.
Then I suggest that you spend your time doing that. You'll have a much larger audience on this board.
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:03 pm to blackrose890
quote:The (valid) positive evidence also doesn't exist for its antithesis. In science regarding origin of matter, the (valid) positive evidence doesn't exist. . . . at all,
The (valid) positive evidence also doesn't exist for a magical creation
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
They don't look like reptiles tho
I love it when people can't look past phenotypes
Posted on 2/12/19 at 5:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The (valid) positive evidence also doesn't exist for its antithesis. In science regarding origin of matter, the (valid) positive evidence doesn't exist. . . . at all,
We don't disagree, that's why my edit included my position which is everyone pullback and attempt to research the knowledge gaps and avoid putting labels on things we are not currently able to understand.
Page 25 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News