- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:21 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Lol, imagine if Bondi actually acted like an AG and prosecuted the many others involved. Instead of protecting them.
Who has she protected? Don’t be scared to be specific.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:25 pm to BBONDS25
Uh, many of Trumps friends that he is also protecting.
She started it in FLA and why she is in place.
They need each other. Sharpies hide it all
She started it in FLA and why she is in place.
They need each other. Sharpies hide it all
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:28 pm to PurpleCrush
In other words, you can't name anyone. You think simply saying it makes it so.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:33 pm to AlterEd
Lol, I think its TBD at this point.
The chips are still falling, will see what Andrew and Bill have to say when they speak.
Stay tuned
The chips are still falling, will see what Andrew and Bill have to say when they speak.
Stay tuned
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:46 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Who has she protected? Don’t be scared to be specific.
quote:
Uh, many of Trumps friends that he is also protecting.
I see specificity isn’t your strong suit. Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:13 pm to BBONDS25
Not Secific?
Neither is Bondi or Don when asked about their involvement. I mean, he is kinda in them?
Even under oath acting as Mean Girl AG
Neither is Bondi or Don when asked about their involvement. I mean, he is kinda in them?
Even under oath acting as Mean Girl AG
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:15 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Not Secific?
Still can’t think of someone? Amazing how you reach your conclusion without having knowledge of any specifics. Specificity isn’t your forte. Wild speculation is.
quote:
Neither is Bondi or Don when asked about their involvement. I mean, he is kinda in them?
Liar. Trump said any implication he did anything nefarious was a hoax. That’s pretty fricking specific. Is Bondi in them? The part I liked the best on the files is where the FBI and one of the victims attorneys confirmed that Trump was the only person willing to help them. And the part where he banned Epstein from his properties 20 years ago.
Those are what we call specifics. We know…not your forte.
This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:18 pm to AlterEd
Won't be satisfied until I see Bill Gates on that list.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:26 pm to BBONDS25
Trumps is a fan fav listed alot, so I'd specifically like to see what is factual if any involvement, would you
Of course, his close associates may have some splaining to do also. Follow the money it will tell.
Of course, his close associates may have some splaining to do also. Follow the money it will tell.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:28 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Trumps is a fan fav listed alot, so I'd specifically like to see what is factual if any involvement, would you
Any accusation of wrongdoing has been completely dismissed by Obama and Biden’s DOJ. You have to be a complete moron to think Trump is guilty of a crime. Again. The specifics are that Trump helped. Trump banned Epstein. And the negative accusations were from someone who has been involuntarily commited and were deemed ridiculous by democrats run DOJs. Use a modicum of common sense and stop being an idiot.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:45 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
You said that the resignations had nothing to do with under age sex. I said you don't know that. If there was no credible evidence in these files linking them to illegal acts, then why resign? Just because there may have been nothing linking them to illegal activities in these files, does not mean there couldn't been something out there?
Hate to say it, but I agree with SFP.
If there’s proof of child sexual abuse or rape of trafficked adults, (particularly children) by all means convict them and throw them in the woodchipper. Feet first.
But it appears these people are resigning simply from pressure due to having some sort of friendly relationship with him.
Even email snippets released on them (and other people) are meaningless, because without other supporting emails not shown they can be taken out of context.
So you think “just because there may have been nothing linking them to illegal activities in these files doesn’t mean there couldn’t have been something out there”?
Thats not the way it works, there’s that pesky thing called “proof”.
By your standard just because you aren’t linked to illegal activities in the files doesn’t mean you weren’t diddling and eating babies.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:48 pm to BBONDS25
Stop with the Obama stuff, the dems didn't make this. Kash, Bongino, Rogan, MAGA, MTG did.
Are you NOT interested in any wrong doing financially, personally, or anything Don could be involved with? He is pres now and Bondi have the history with all of this in Fla. Facts
Are you NOT interested in any wrong doing financially, personally, or anything Don could be involved with? He is pres now and Bondi have the history with all of this in Fla. Facts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 4:59 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Stop with the Obama stuff, the dems didn't make this.
They’ve had since Obama was President to use anything incriminating in the files against Trump, that’s a fact.
They’ve fabricated Trump conspiracies about Russia, Ukraine, J6, raping a woman in a crowded department store, impeached him, tried imprisoning/bankrupting him, and finally tried killing him.
When all they had to do was release the files you claim they had to stop him.
Face facts. There’s nothing there concerning Trump.
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:03 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Stop with the Obama stuff, the dems didn't make this. Kash, Bongino, Rogan, MAGA, MTG did.
What? I stated a fact. Clearly the point flew way over your head. The Obama DOJ found any allegations against Trump to be not credible.
quote:
Stop with the Obama stuff, the dems didn't make this. Kash, Bongino, Rogan, MAGA, MTG did.
Make your allegation. I am not interested in in speculation.
This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:17 pm to BBONDS25
Allegedly
Trump did bad things with Jeff for years he and Bondi, and others know about it and are protecting each other to cover it up.
Do you care if true?
Trump did bad things with Jeff for years he and Bondi, and others know about it and are protecting each other to cover it up.
Do you care if true?
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:22 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Allegedly
What is alleged? It is a fact that the Obama DOJ did not find any accusation against Trump regarding Epstein to be credible. Your ignorance to the facts doesn’t change the facts.
quote:
Trump did bad things with Jeff for years
All evidence to the contrary. Make your allegation be specific. You won’t because you can’t. You want it to be so very badly. Unfortunately you dont have ANY facts to support what you wish for.
quote:
he and Bondi, and others know about it and are protecting each other to cover it up.
The only two people to release files are also the two trying to cover it up? That’s some twisted “logic.”
quote:
Do you care if true?
I don’t care to participate in wild speculation. If you have some facts or specific allegations make them. You don’t so you won’t.
This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:31 pm to BBONDS25
He is guilty and you don't care is what you are saying. We knew this before all of you're complicit bs.
Later B
Later B
This post was edited on 2/23/26 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:32 pm to PurpleCrush
You type with a lisp
Posted on 2/23/26 at 5:35 pm to lsuguy84
What say you about Him and Bondi and all this?
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News