- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2000 mules doesn’t prove the election was stolen
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:09 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:I've been stuck on that one, boozie.
Why wouldn’t they release it
At first I thought they were just protecting themselves from lawsuits after portraying people as criminals. But, as you know, there are protections for that.
I'd have to revisit media law to see what they could and couldn't get away with. Maybe they just wanted to avoid all that trouble just to be safe. I honestly don't know. But, I doubt that flick will make a ton of money, and lawsuit money would wipe that out their profits if they tread too recklessly. Just a guess.
0
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:13 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:They do not identify anyone's cell phone that was tracked, nor do they identify anyone dropping off ballots at boxes. They verbally assert that this is what we're looking at, and they claim to have the video and tracking data to match what they are asserting, but they did not show that in this documentary.
The dots between the phone tracking pinged individuals and the video recordings at the ballot boxes are not connected.Would you agree?
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:14 pm to GregMaddux
quote:
How the hell was zuckerburg allowed to fund drop boxes?
Follow the money
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:15 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
There hasn’t been any proof it was stolen in the sense that fake votes were cast etc.
There was… actually massive amounts of this. More votes than voters, hundreds of thousands more mail in ballots counted than were sent out. Dead people voting. It’s all out there your ilk just ignores it because the end result was agreeable
quote:
What there was though was lots of scheming on the part of social media and the actual media as well as states changing their voting laws etc illegally because of covid.
Literally an illegal stolen election. I’m sure if the states unilaterally broke their own election laws to ensure Trump remained in power you would be totally cool with it
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:17 pm to LSUgusto
It was my biggest complaint. Why not show the same person at 2 locations instead of the same scene several times?
But it's his career if it gets debunked. He definitely laid it all out there and declared it as fact. Everyone just has to keep harassing your politicians about it and comment on every news organization's social media about it.
But it's his career if it gets debunked. He definitely laid it all out there and declared it as fact. Everyone just has to keep harassing your politicians about it and comment on every news organization's social media about it.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:24 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
I just wish they would've shown the same people doing it multiple times. That's the smoking gun
They stated this very directly when they listed the criterion that they used to actually count. You had to visit TEN drop boxes AND visit FIVE political nonprofit locations.
So yeah, they ONLY counted the same people doing the same thing over and over.
Then at the end, didn’t they lower the criterion to seven drop boxes visited and the illegal vote totals were obviously much higher.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:34 pm to Knight of Old
The Dems have been stealing elections for decades, take a look at all the major cities under Dem control. Once was good now complete shite with racists and radicals making policies.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:01 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:They did.
They stated this
quote:They did. But, they did not show one single person doing it over and over. That's the problem.
they ONLY counted the same people doing the same thing over and over
They say they have that video. It needs to be seen.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:13 pm to LSUgusto
ETA - Wha?
I just watched it and it is irrefutable evidence. What happens? I don't know. But the election was fraudulent.
They help catch murderers with this same data.
I just watched it and it is irrefutable evidence. What happens? I don't know. But the election was fraudulent.
They help catch murderers with this same data.
This post was edited on 5/10/22 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:40 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
They say they have that video. It needs to be seen
I agree with you that this should be shown. But I also cannot come up with a reasonable claim that can be made to visit ten drop boxes.
I do believe that this is more than enough evidence to hand to law enforcement to take the next step and do what I think you are talking about….a criminal investigation.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:44 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
They stated this very directly when they listed the criterion that they used to actually count. You had to visit TEN drop boxes AND visit FIVE political nonprofit locations. So yeah, they ONLY counted the same people doing the same thing over and over. Then at the end, didn’t they lower the criterion to seven drop boxes visited and the illegal vote totals were obviously much higher.
What accepted statistical methods did they use to design their sample criteria, and what was the confidence level. In other words how did they determine a person visiting 10 drop boxes, and 5 NGOs was more likely to indicate a mule than a person that visited 15 drop boxes, or 5 drop boxes. Just changing the boxes visited level to 5 results in more than 54,000 possible mules, are they all mules , if not, at what level of drop box stops does it indicate the people are mules, 6,7,8,9,10,11? What is the statistical correlation between cell phone location, and time of ping with the location and time st a location of people shown in the video. Without this type of analysis which is done all the time in real research the movie is no better than a finding Bigfoot documentary.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:00 pm to TulaneFan
It is impossible that the FBI and CIA do not know every single thing that happened to tilt the election to Joe.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:01 pm to CDawson
But Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell do 
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:07 pm to baybeefeetz
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:10 pm to TulaneFan
quote:
Are you still clinging to the conspiracy theory that potato joe got 81 million legal votes?
all 50 states do. but muh dinesh!
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:12 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Why wouldn’t they release it and put massive pressure on law enforcement to pursue it?
A skeptic would say it’s because they are lying and that’s why they didn’t show it
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:19 pm to TulaneFan
quote:
There was… actually massive amounts of this. More votes than voters, hundreds of thousands more mail in ballots counted than were sent out. Dead people voting. It’s all out there your ilk just ignores it because the end result was agreeable
Wait? Whuut?
Ok- i can see the dead ppl voting fraud …it’s a common fraud technique and should be easy to catch.
But massive amounts of mailed ballots counted than were sent out??? I call BS
Please send supporting links
And the more votes than voters claim …please send a link on that too-
Posted on 5/10/22 at 9:25 pm to TulaneFan
What is truly flabbergasting is the manner in which SCOTUS blew off the TX suit accompanied by several other states. Very disheartening for Americas future…
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News