- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 117M gallon Palisades reservoir emptied …
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:30 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You could have had 100 reservoirs this size, and the tanks could not have kept up with the demand.
"You could have 10 billion gallons of water and it would not have mattered"
Like I said, you post some really dumb stuff sometimes.
1
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:34 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Common sense would tell you that having 117 million extra gallons would have helped fight the fire.
It would have made little difference, the information is posted if you are able to read proper english.
quote:
MAKE COMMON SENSE COMMON AGAIN
With populists, thats impossible.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:35 am to Paddyshack
quote:Probably correct, because the system wouldnt have been able to pump enough water regardless of inventory due to tank limitations.
"You could have 10 billion gallons of water and it would not have mattered"
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:40 am to Penrod
quote:
That is not valid because these were not “house fires”. These were forest fires that reached houses. You can’t save the house by just fighting the fire in the house. It will simply restart when the burning hillside catches it on fire again.
You’re such a tool.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:41 am to RFK
quote:
Keep in mind this is an unprecedented wildfire
No it isn’t. Good Lord, you’re a moron.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:42 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The reservoir wouldnt have made much of a difference.
Roger joining with the dems yet again. Color me shocked.
This post was edited on 1/12/25 at 10:14 am
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:49 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Roger joining with the dems yet again. Pilot me shocked.
Never fails. His TDS is flaring up badly this morning. Must've had too much to drink last night.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:49 am to Statestreet
quote:
and ......water.
Sure. But once this fire started, and the winds were blowing at hurricane force, there was no stopping it with water or anything else. We are going to have fires. If they are going to be controlled, by water and other fire fighting, they need to be manageable fires, and that comes from fire prevention techniques - controlled burns, fire breaks and cleaning of debris.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:54 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Roger joining with the dems yet again.
Bonds saying something utterly retarded again.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:56 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Ah, just commpon sense?
you dont need any, just common sense and the ability to read what people who manage water supplies tell you.
Perhaps you should let Gov. Newsom know that before he wastes everyone's time in the major investigation he's calling for.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:56 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
That's not how fire works. Fire passes through the forest until it reaches houses
That not how this fire works either.
Embers were igniting shite far from the fire source.
People were at the mercy of the wind, not of water.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 9:57 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Perhaps you should let Gov. Newsom know that
They'll come to a similar conclusion.
The investigation is to appease the little people who look for pounds of flesh before actually researching anything.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:00 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:What's the purpose of the mountain reservoir, Rog?
The investigation is to appease the little people who look for pounds of flesh before actually researching anything.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:03 am to NC_Tigah
To supply water.
But you fail to understand this...
Nothing was saving those homes. This is an overregulation problem, and y'all are fricking it up.
But you fail to understand this...
quote:
it would’ve cut demand on the area’s water system from four times to three times as high as normal.
Nothing was saving those homes. This is an overregulation problem, and y'all are fricking it up.
This post was edited on 1/12/25 at 10:05 am
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:09 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
you dont need any, just common sense and the ability to read what people who manage water supplies tell you.
In other words you are just pulling shite out of your arse
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:11 am to War Eagle 777
quote:
In other words you are just pulling shite out of your arse
You can hang on false reasoning if you choose, the problem with these fires are thus..
1) People living where people should not live.
2) Overregulation.
Now you can pick up your pitchfork and torch and join the other populist dweebs.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:13 am to War Eagle 777
quote:
In other words you are just pulling shite out of your arse
That’s his MO. I have caught him flat out lying several times.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:14 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:So why were firefighters on sight when the hydrants ran dry?
Nothing was saving those homes.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:14 am to BBONDS25
quote:
That’s his MO. I have caught him flat out lying several times.
Son, you arent educated enough to catch anyone lying on this board.
You have to Wiki everything you dont understand. N ow, youre pretending to be more knowledgeable than actual water managers.
Posted on 1/12/25 at 10:15 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
People living where people should not live.
Why shouldn’t people live in pacific palisades or the Hollywood hills, Roger? You’re so jealous of the wealthy people. It’s why you want to tax them more.
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News