- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official AR-15 thread
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:27 pm to Carson123987
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:27 pm to Carson123987
quote:
Looking for this as well. I'm almost out
Reload, brah.
Well, bullets are pretty hard to find right now too. But I've got about 300-400 rounds of 223 loaded up anyway so I guess I'm alright.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:29 pm to Carson123987
what WAS a decent price per 223 round to pay in aprox. 500 rd. packages?
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:29 pm to bapple
Don't have a place to anymore. i will next year after I move into this condo. Don't have enough space in my current apartment
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:36 pm to Carson123987
how much can yu reload vs buying for?
Posted on 12/19/12 at 10:44 pm to Ole Geauxt
30 cents(150 for 500) was average last year. Cheapest I can find it now is 38-40. The fricking gun show was selling lake city brass 62 grain penetrator tips for 500 for 1000 rounds loose. Same shite sold for 289-329 last year. Rediculous. Reloading is the way to go.
Posted on 12/19/12 at 11:24 pm to Propagandalf
quote:
A $700 rifle will perform and shoot as good as the most expensive Noveske. You decide how much money to waste on a name and rollmark when buying an AR.
Is that so? I thought that the 10% higher carbon content and the presence of Vanadium in the barrel steels that are mil-Spec per MIL-B-11595E led to a finer grain structure and harder, more temperature resistant, long lasting barrels over their 4140 non mil-spec counterparts. While the cheaper steel isn't likely to "fail" during semi auto use, long before it reaches it's thermal threshold and ruptures, it will lose accuracy due to expansion or deformation. During sustained rapid-fire, a barrel made of mil-spec 4150 cmv steel will retain its shape and thus remain more accurate for a longer period of time than a 4140 barrel.
Even in the best steels, during casting, there could be pockets of alloys that are too large or too numerous within a given area such that it would lower the shear strength of the steel, making the part susceptible to failure under stress. There are tests that stress the parts and then inspect for subsurface defects. Some manufacturers batch test parts, while others test each part individually.
The most expensive rifles are made from better materials and often involve additional cold-working processes that create compressive stress and further strengthen parts. Parts are individually tested and inspected for defects as opposed to no testing at all or batch testing.
Since, admittedly, the differences between the "$700 rifle" and "the most expensive" will be found at the extremes oftemperature and stress, the question is will 99% of civilian ar-15 owners ever notice a difference. Which leads to the next point:
quote:
You will never use it in a combat setting.
I hate it when people say this. This can't be known. The history of mankind is one of war. Your statement is short-sighted and one born of a prolonged period of peace and ease. Given human nature, peace can never last. It has never, it will never. With the erosion of American dominance, it is but a matter of time.
This post was edited on 12/20/12 at 8:11 am
Posted on 12/19/12 at 11:44 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
With the erosion of American dominance, it is but a matter of time.
People think I am crazy when I say this. I agree 100%
Posted on 12/20/12 at 12:07 am to olgoi khorkhoi
olgoi, that all sounds fantastic and very scientific. Lets go to sherburne and shoot your Noveske against my RRA. I BET you can't tell the difference.
Most for sale gun ads list their gun as having under (usually by a lot) 1,000 rounds passed through the barrel. Your average person doesn't have the time, money or desire to shoot enough rounds to bring their rifle to the point you are talking about. Sure it all sounds good and is probably true. I could drive an armored car as my daily driver to be certain that I don't get car jacked and that if involved in a wreck I am likely to survive. But I don't because they are too expensive, the gas would be a bitch and IT'S NOT NECESSARY for me. You can spend a lot of money overdoing almost anything. You just have to ask is the juice worth the squeeze?
As far as using the rifle in a combat setting. Let's say you're right and Red Dawn happens. You walk outside with your AR and maybe get a mag off before the HIGHLY TRAINED MILITARY/MERCENARY/WAY HARDER THAN YOU motherfricker puts one in your head. You're not an operator, you're untrained, you're by yourself and you're probably not even a very good shot. shite the military doesn't even use Noveske/DanielDefense/(insert over-priced AR manufacturer). They use RRA, Bushmaster, and whoever else can fill a contract on the cheap. Just sayin...
Most for sale gun ads list their gun as having under (usually by a lot) 1,000 rounds passed through the barrel. Your average person doesn't have the time, money or desire to shoot enough rounds to bring their rifle to the point you are talking about. Sure it all sounds good and is probably true. I could drive an armored car as my daily driver to be certain that I don't get car jacked and that if involved in a wreck I am likely to survive. But I don't because they are too expensive, the gas would be a bitch and IT'S NOT NECESSARY for me. You can spend a lot of money overdoing almost anything. You just have to ask is the juice worth the squeeze?
As far as using the rifle in a combat setting. Let's say you're right and Red Dawn happens. You walk outside with your AR and maybe get a mag off before the HIGHLY TRAINED MILITARY/MERCENARY/WAY HARDER THAN YOU motherfricker puts one in your head. You're not an operator, you're untrained, you're by yourself and you're probably not even a very good shot. shite the military doesn't even use Noveske/DanielDefense/(insert over-priced AR manufacturer). They use RRA, Bushmaster, and whoever else can fill a contract on the cheap. Just sayin...
Posted on 12/20/12 at 1:01 am to Propagandalf
quote:
you're untrained
Speak for yourself. You may not be, but several people take it upon themselves to be proficient with their weapons, beyond range trips and shooting mags full of ammo with no purpose.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 1:16 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
olgoi khorkhoi
mother of god. That was poetry

Posted on 12/20/12 at 2:48 am to RATeamWannabe
This. Just because someone is/was not in the infantry does not mean that they cannot be quite proficient with firearms. For a few hundred bucks a day a civilian can train with SF operators like Travis Haley (Force Recon) and Larry Vickers (Delta)...hell Haley even comes to the New Orleans area to train every year (Nolatac) I believe. Plenty of guys take training very seriously, spending lots of cash sending thousands of rounds downrange in training every year.
I'm not trying to be a brand whore, but there definitely a difference between a Rock River and a Noveske. I do believe that Noveske is overkill for someone that doesn't plan to shoot it very much, but they are works of art.
I'm not trying to be a brand whore, but there definitely a difference between a Rock River and a Noveske. I do believe that Noveske is overkill for someone that doesn't plan to shoot it very much, but they are works of art.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 2:59 am to Yat27
Haley has classes in Livingston a year from now, that God willing, I will sign up for if I can get employment in this shitty economy after I graduate.
Also, those that are enthusiastic about firearms and spend their own time and money investing in them are almost always more proficient than those that are not. Police and armed forces are no different, and often no amount of training can overcome the fact that they simply don't have that desire to be proficient.
Not that I believe in the Red Dawn scenario, but there aren't enough elite troops in the world to come house to house in this country and take our weapons. A more likely scenario is National Guard or Reservist. And there is a very large training gap separating those two groups.
Also, those that are enthusiastic about firearms and spend their own time and money investing in them are almost always more proficient than those that are not. Police and armed forces are no different, and often no amount of training can overcome the fact that they simply don't have that desire to be proficient.
Not that I believe in the Red Dawn scenario, but there aren't enough elite troops in the world to come house to house in this country and take our weapons. A more likely scenario is National Guard or Reservist. And there is a very large training gap separating those two groups.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 4:37 am to RATeamWannabe
quote:
A more likely scenario is National Guard or Reservist. And there is a very large training gap separating those two groups.
This was true a decade ago, but damn near every Guard and Reservist has at least 1 tour to Iraq or Afghanistan now, more than likely 3-4 if they've been in since before 9/11. I know a few Guards in the Bossier/Shreveport area with 2 tours to Iraq and 3 to Afghanistan. The training prior to those tours has gotten more intensive over the years.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 8:02 am to Propagandalf
quote:
I could drive an armored car as my daily driver to be certain that I don't get car jacked and that if involved in a wreck I am likely to survive. But I don't because they are too expensive, the gas would be a bitch and IT'S NOT NECESSARY for me. You can spend a lot of money overdoing almost anything. You just have to ask is the juice worth the squeeze?
I spent under $1100 for my first battle rifle (sans grip and optics) and I would trust it with my life in any conditions. How much was your RRA?
As for the doomsday scenario you laid out, against the full force of the US military, no, no one really has a chance. Against any other foe… game on.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 8:08 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:even nato?
Against any other foe… game on.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 8:28 am to Ole Geauxt
yep. I plan on continuing to live in America, so If NATO forces are engaging the population where I will be, they are likely also engaging the US military.
In my humble opinion, the most likely scenario is a small EMP blast a couple hundred miles up, centered over the United States. This would knock out the grid and disable 99.9% of all electronic technology including the military's. They have known about this threat for years and have failed to protect their technology against it through EMP hardening waivers because of what I would consider to be a fairly insignificant cost.
It would take at least 1.5-2 years to begin to get the grid back up and everyone with food would be battling the starving masses to keep it. That could heat up your rifle. Just sayin'.
In my humble opinion, the most likely scenario is a small EMP blast a couple hundred miles up, centered over the United States. This would knock out the grid and disable 99.9% of all electronic technology including the military's. They have known about this threat for years and have failed to protect their technology against it through EMP hardening waivers because of what I would consider to be a fairly insignificant cost.
It would take at least 1.5-2 years to begin to get the grid back up and everyone with food would be battling the starving masses to keep it. That could heat up your rifle. Just sayin'.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 8:31 am to olgoi khorkhoi
I figure Barry ain't beyond slipping in bed, under the covers with NATO on our arms situation. I hope I'm wrong.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 9:14 am to Ole Geauxt
quote:
I figure Barry ain't beyond slipping in bed, under the covers with NATO on our arms situation. I hope I'm wrong.
this worries me more than just a standard AR gun ban.
Posted on 12/20/12 at 9:42 am to Carson123987
anyone know where i can find 20 rd FN FNAR mags? checked every place i know (like 2) and they are all out
Posted on 12/20/12 at 9:48 am to Carson123987
I got some in yesterday from bulkammo.com but it was $420 shipped
Popular
Back to top
