Started By
Message

John Deere 5065...anybody have or worked with one

Posted on 4/11/19 at 4:38 pm
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 4:38 pm
Looking to possibly trade my 4105 in on the 5 series, looking for any feedback????
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 7:36 pm to
A LOT more tractor than a 4105. Heavier, better hydraulics, more horsepower and torque in a simple package. They’re dependable machines for farm work and property maintenance and great machines for hunting property. Not the tightest turning machine Deere has ever built.

The power reverser transmission is absolutely worth the money, especially if you’re putting a loader on. If you’re not putting a loader on I’d still prefer the power reverser (it’s just a fancy name for shuttle shift) because it has a wet clutch as opposed to dry. The dry clutches can be a weak point with a lot of use.

Not sure how much you plan to haul the tractor, but with the additional weight and size, I wouldn’t put it behind anything smaller than a 3/4 ton truck. If you’re putting on a loader buy a weight box or put something heavy on the three point for counter weight. It is nigh impossible to get enough weight on the wheels to keep rear on the ground with a heavy load above chest high.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 7:46 pm to
Thanks, yeah a big upgrade from the 4105, I probably did not buy a big enough tractor the first time and am probably buying a little too much this time..... if I get it it will have 4 wd loader and shuttle shift and adding the lane shark (side boom rotary cutter)

I did not know about the dry and wet clutch, but that makes the shuttle shift even more important

I am concerned with turning radius

Do you think filling the tires with water would be enough of a ballast?
This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 7:54 pm
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11441 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 7:47 pm to
If it’s a similar series as my 5093e I’ve had a lot of problems in the last year with mine. I’ve had multiple problems with the starter. I’ve had problems with a faulty design on the radiator. The nipple that comes off the radiator that has a hose connected to the coolant/antifreeze reservoir is a piece of shite plastic that had stress cracks form. It eventually split open and there is no replacement part other than replacing the radiator. They’re powerful tractors though. I can’t imagine dealing with a tractor that has def. if you get one make sure it doesn’t have it.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 7:51 pm to
No def, it uses regeneration from what I understand

What year model do you have?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 7:58 pm to
Just buy a 9430 and be done with it
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Just buy a 9430 and be done with it


Did you see where I was concerned with turning radius?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Turning radius
about 3 acres wide or so
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Do you think filling the tires with water would be enough of a ballast?


Depends on what you plan to pick up. When you hang weight off the three point, the position of the weight on the rear hitch transfers some of the weight from the front axle onto the back. Essentially it moves the pivot point from front axle to back. Adding fluid or wheel weights does not accomplish the same feat due to the position of the weight. It merely makes the back axle heavier while the front axle remains the pivot point.

For heavy loads - ballast box or implement is far superior to fluid filled tires. Fluid also voids the warranty on most radial tires.
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:18 pm to
Not familiar with a 5093E but I believe it’s a 4 cylinder tractor. I don’t have a lot of experience with the 4 cylinder 5XXX Deere tractors, but I’m told the M’s are far superior to the E’s. The 5065E would be 3 cylinder and under 75 hp so no DEF.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:28 pm to
Good info, thanks
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11441 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 8:35 pm to
I have a 2011. It’s powerful enough to pull a 12’ which is nice and light enough to get in a wet area with a smaller harrow and turn over the soil. The M series is like the Platinum series of Ford and mine is the lariat. It has all the bells and whistles and for a utility tractor in no mans land as far as capabilities it’s a waste of money. If I’m going to drop that kind of money on a tractor I’ll buy a 6430 and get a bigger tractor for the same price.
This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 8:36 pm
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:01 pm to
My understanding is the 5045, 5055, and 5065 only come in E trim now
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
1706 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:02 pm to
Ever looked at a Case IH Farmall C series?

The cab is so nice that Kubota copied it with the launch of the M4.

No Regen or DPF on a Case IH either. No DEF on the 75 and below.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17252 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:04 pm to
I have not, might do so although I am partial to green

No cab on this purchase
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:15 pm to
Deere’s 6 Series are great machines, all the way back to the 6X00 Series. Even our Kubota and New Holland guys will tell you a 6 Series Deere pretty much sets the performance standard in the 100-150 hp range. The new 6M and R four cylinder tractors seem to be the machine of choice on a lot of the bigger plantations in South Georgia. Lot of 6430’s still out there too.

I had an opportunity to plant a couple of dove fields on a 6120M. That’s. The. Tits.
Posted by gsvar2004
Member since Nov 2007
7952 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:04 pm to
We have a 5065e. It’s alot of tractor.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9391 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

John Deere 5065...anybody have or worked with one


I think I have one. I will look tomorrow. If it is the one I am thinking about it is a good little tractor for planting food plots and doing light dirt work.
Posted by djs017
Member since Oct 2014
238 posts
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:28 pm to
My dad has a 2wd 5065e, has loader but no cab. It’s a good tractor and as others have said, it’s got plenty of hydraulic power. Keeping traction on the back tires is definitely the limiting factor of the loader. We usually keep a 3 point roto-tiller hooked up to help. I’ve moved 2200# super sacks of feed with it but it was balanced on the front wheels with basically zero weight on the rear. Only issue we had was having to replace the starter at about 5 or 6 years. Put a cheap replacement from eBay on it and it hasn’t missed a beat since. I’m not 100% but I wanna say it’s around a 2012 model. My only complaint is that it’s not 4wd.
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11416 posts
Posted on 4/12/19 at 6:57 am to
I have one. We use it to clip grass with a 10ft bush hog, grade the shop headquarters, and put steel wheels on it to run water furrows. It’s a dependable little tractor.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram