- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/4/10 at 9:53 pm to INFIDEL
quote:there are some people that do that... However it wouldn't benefit the hunter unless they had an insane amount of land.
Posted by INFIDEL
quote:
it's not THEIR ducks and deer either (I don't want them) but the point is...
Oh, you are absolutely correct. They aren't THEIR deer, they are our deer. We just have to wait until they get off THEIR property before we can shoot them, or should everyone put a high fence around their property?
See what I'm saying?
What I have a problem with is these guys in the marsh that are claiming these canals that I grew up fishing. It's bullshite really.
Don't get me wrong. I respect hunters, wish them the best and offer advice if I have seen something. If people would learn to respect each other then it wouldn't be a problem.. However, when I spend $150 on a trip to fish I'm gonna fish.. And have just as much right to the WATER as that hunter
Posted on 8/4/10 at 9:55 pm to The Sportsman
quote:No, not really. Your $150 gets you lots of public water.
And have just as much right to the WATER as that hunter
Posted on 8/4/10 at 9:56 pm to The Sportsman
quote:
What I have a problem with is these guys in the marsh that are claiming these canals that I grew up fishing
See, I don't have a dog in that fight, as I am from Central La. I do understand your plight and I really don't see the problem with people fishing unless I was trying to duck hunt my land at the time. Like I said earlier, I would be torn, but I think I lean towards the land owner.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 9:56 pm to AlxTgr
quote:which is that non-gated canal that they claim is private
quote:
And have just as much right to the WATER as that hunter
No, not really. Your $150 gets you lots of public water.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 9:56 pm to The Sportsman
Why are fish different from ducks, geeses or rabits? You can't come on private property and say "don't mind me, I only want to shoot that rabbit".......
Crawfishers need to stay off private property too.
Crawfishers need to stay off private property too.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:01 pm to The Sportsman
quote:You say claim? Is there any reason to think otherwise?
which is that non-gated canal that they claim is private
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:01 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
seal off canals with dirt/rock/whatever. Eliminate the ebb and flow of tide and the movement of fish/crabs/shrimp/etc into these areas. Like i said earlier, you cant have it both ways.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:03 pm to North of I-10
quote:
you cant have it both ways
bullshite. Birds migrate just like fish. No reson to treat fishing and canals differently. Relic laws from Louisiana's backwoods past. Time to move on, joint the rest of the country and the 21st century.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:06 pm to North of I-10
quote:
seal off canals with dirt/rock/whatever. Eliminate the ebb and flow of tide and the movement of fish/crabs/shrimp/etc into these areas. Like i said earlier, you cant have it both ways.
If this is your defense, I suggest finding another. It's got holes all in it. Liken it to a private driveway on someone's property. If a deer walks up someone's drive, you can't follow up there and shoot it, can you? Then why in the hell should you be able to pull up their canal to chase a fish?
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:09 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:I have a barbed wire fence around my hunting land that has posted signs all over it.
Why are fish different from ducks, geeses or rabits? You can't come on private property and say "don't mind me, I only want to shoot that rabbit".......
Crawfishers need to stay off private property too.
Fenced in land/water =/= non-fenced in land/water
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:13 pm to The Sportsman
quote:
Fenced in land/water =/= non-fenced in land/water
The now states that it is an individuals responsibility to know where they are at, not the landowner's to notify them. If I catch a guy on my lease he's going to be prosecuted I don't care if he's been hunting there his whole life or it's his first adventure. That's fact.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:13 pm to The Sportsman
quote:
Fenced in land/water =/= non-fenced in land/water
What do you consider the GATE part of "Gated off Canals"?
So if it is gated and fenced, you think it should not be hunted or fished? Regardless of tidal flow? I agree.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:14 pm to INFIDEL
its not a defense its the way it is. Comparing deer on a driveway to fish in the water is apples to oranges.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:15 pm to The Sportsman
quote:
I have a barbed wire fence around my hunting land that has posted signs all over it.
not necessary to fence your property...unless you have cattle
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:17 pm to North of I-10
If I dig an access canal from the edge of my property to the center and put up a gate to restrict others access, I do not see any reason anyone should consider that an invitation for them to trespass. Stay out. Catch fish at the gate. Do not open it and enter my private property. If you do, expect to be prosecuted or shot.
I'm out, it is obviousl people disagree.
I'm out, it is obviousl people disagree.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:21 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
its not a defense its the way it is. Comparing deer on a driveway to fish in the water is apples to oranges.
Not according to the law, apparently. Canal=access to private property across private property=driveway
Deer=publicly owned game animal=fish
shooting deer by trespasser=catching fish by trespasser
law supports comparison=don't see the problem with comparison
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:25 pm to North of I-10
quote:No, it's really not. They own the land. They also happen to own the canal. We know you don't like it, but the fact remains, if you enter in your boat, you're a common trespasser.
its not a defense its the way it is.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:26 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:where are u from? These canals I'm talking about are decades old and dug by the oil industry
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
If I dig an access canal from the edge of my property to the center and put up a gate to restrict others access, I do not see any reason anyone should consider that an invitation for them to trespass. Stay out. Catch fish at the gate. Do not open it and enter my private property. If you do, expect to be prosecuted or shot.
I'm out, it is obviousl people disagree.
Posted on 8/4/10 at 10:27 pm to The Sportsman
quote:
These canals I'm talking about are decades old and dug by the oil industry
Sounds like what us rednecks call pipelines. We can't trespass on those either.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News