- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AR 15: Do I need to register as SBR for 14.5” Barrel?
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:31 am to CarRamrod
Posted on 10/31/18 at 9:31 am to CarRamrod
quote:
there is nothing a real stock could do better than the SBA3 brace does. it is funny it got brace status.
The only thing a real SBR does better is be 100% legal, brace is not a legal protection at all... the ATF technical letters carry no weight of law, they are just opinions on the interpretation of laws, they offer no legal protection, are subject to change, and are no defense in court.
2
Posted on 10/31/18 at 11:26 am to DeafJam73
Go see The Pickle at Buhler Ballistics. I use him a lot, but I am sure there are others in BR that can pin and weld.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 5:18 pm to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:
The only thing a real SBR does better is be 100% legal, brace is not a legal protection at all... the ATF technical letters carry no weight of law, they are just opinions on the interpretation of laws, they offer no legal protection, are subject to change, and are no defense in court.
Yeah, it's probably only a matter of time before they get the bump stock treatment.
Posted on 10/31/18 at 6:51 pm to Korin
Surely they’ll grandfather them
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:08 am to DeafJam73
quote:
If I use a 14.5” barrel, do I need to register it as an SBR or use a pistol brace
If you permanently affix a muzzle device bringing the barrel length to at least 16", then no. And I wouldn't gamble on that - I would make it AT LEAST 16.1" so you don't even up in federal trouble with an overeager enforcement agent.
Otherwise, yes.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 8:23 am to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:well that sounds legal to me.
the ATF technical letters carry no weight of law, they are just opinions on the interpretation of laws
quote:an interpretation of the law by the enforcement agency sounds like a defense to me. But im no lawyer.
they offer no legal protection, are subject to change, and are no defense in court.
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:38 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
If you permanently affix a muzzle device bringing the barrel length to at least 16", then no. And I wouldn't gamble on that - I would make it AT LEAST 16.1" so you don't even up in federal trouble with an overeager enforcement agent.
It can't be a regular A2 FH either because that's only 15.9".
Posted on 11/1/18 at 9:43 am to Korin
quote:
Yeah, it's probably only a matter of time before they get the bump stock treatment.
So, they'll remain legal?
Posted on 11/1/18 at 5:58 pm to Clyde Tipton
I thought those stupid things got banned (sales, not possession)?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News