Started By
Message

re: Animal rights campaigners outragedover cheerleader hunting pics

Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to
Before the edit, I think he was saying that the graph can be used to support your argument, as well.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to
I read the graph wrong initially, so I had to go back and edit.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

I think the graph shows that combined efforts are the answer to conservation. Enforcement and management are the key.

Kenya still lost 82K elephants 12 years after the ban while Zim was adding elephants.


Are all other things equal, though? What happened around 1987 when the graph clearly ticked upward? It looks like the growth rate demonstrated post-1987 is very similar to Zimbabwe.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:


Are all other things equal, though? What happened around 1987 when the graph clearly ticked upward? It looks like the growth rate demonstrated post-1987 is very similar to Zimbabwe.


It'd be nice if the environmental conditions would have been noted, which I'm guessing they were in the original article, but not here. Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.
Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
21345 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Sounds like you have a love for cats



No, I have a hatred for sport hunting especially when it comes to rare animals. Some of the animals she killed are close to becoming endangered.

quote:

GTFO GFY ETC


Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:46 am to
quote:

It'd be nice if the environmental conditions would have been noted, which I'm guessing they were in the original article, but not here.
Was the article linked? I think I missed it.
quote:

Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.
Quite possibly, which is why I want to see the chart prior to 1973. It looks like Zimbabwe has a head start on Kenya. I want the full story before giving that chart the weight others are.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:00 am to
Hoover institution

Here's the original article from the Hoover Institution. Doesn't talk about any conditions other than populations and economical gains.

I miss not having unlimited access to Journals through LSU.
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 11:02 am
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.


They also started with a larger breeding population. If you have 10 families, chances are they'll produce more offspring than 1 family.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:04 am to
Thanks. I'll read when I get a chance.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:05 am to
Starting numbers don't matter because the populations still aren't reproducing in proportion to each other.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Starting numbers don't matter because the populations still aren't reproducing in proportion to each other.


You don't have enough information to support that statement. Like Boom Roasted said, you need to know what the Zimbabwe population did from a similar starting population. Also, ignoring all other stimulants is faulty. You can't assume all other things are equal unless you have a basis for such. Kenya went through several bouts of infighting that could have resulted in killed animals. That fighting also took resources away from enforcing poaching laws. Did Zimbabwe have similar issues?
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:17 am to
quote:

You can't assume all other things are equal unless you have a basis for such


quote:

Kenya went through several bouts of infighting that could have resulted in killed animals


Isn't this an assumption?

How do we know they didn't start from similar starting points?

I would like to know more of the story as well, but looking at this 38 year survey, Zimbabwe elephants are doing better than Kenya.

Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:27 am to


Hopefully this picture is visible. It clearly shows that at similar population numbers, the growth rates are nearly identical.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:29 am to
Interesting.
Posted by georgia
445
Member since Jan 2007
9217 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

If the US didn't have such a hate for horse slaughter we could be eating it's cousin regularly. I have heard donkey steaks are good according to Andrew Zimmern


horse slaughter is legal here again, but needs reform BADLY. its not killing them thats inhumane, its the shoving them into multi decked cattle trailers that are sized for calves and hauling them across country with broken limbs to one of the three processing plants thats inhumane.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Interesting.



Just have to hope I:

quote:

Don't confuse the subject with facts.


Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:54 am to
From the looks of it Kenya isn't following the trend of Zimbabwe though.

Kenya
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

From the looks of it Kenya isn't following the trend of Zimbabwe though.


Could very well be due to lax laws in Tanzania.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

horse slaughter is legal here again, but needs reform BADLY. its not killing them thats inhumane, its the shoving them into multi decked cattle trailers that are sized for calves and hauling them across country with broken limbs to one of the three processing plants thats inhumane.


It's legal but funding for inspectors was pulled, which means no slaughter will occur.

Instead congress thinks it more humane to haul them to Mexico for slaughter in their plants.

Laws were put in place back when the video surfaced in California of the cull dairy slaughter house pushing a down cow that prohibit any animal who can't walk in on its own to be slaughtered.

Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:03 pm to
Keep on correlating
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram