- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Animal rights campaigners outragedover cheerleader hunting pics
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Before the edit, I think he was saying that the graph can be used to support your argument, as well.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:34 am to Galactic Inquisitor
I read the graph wrong initially, so I had to go back and edit.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:37 am to pointdog33
quote:
I think the graph shows that combined efforts are the answer to conservation. Enforcement and management are the key.
Kenya still lost 82K elephants 12 years after the ban while Zim was adding elephants.
Are all other things equal, though? What happened around 1987 when the graph clearly ticked upward? It looks like the growth rate demonstrated post-1987 is very similar to Zimbabwe.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:44 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Are all other things equal, though? What happened around 1987 when the graph clearly ticked upward? It looks like the growth rate demonstrated post-1987 is very similar to Zimbabwe.
It'd be nice if the environmental conditions would have been noted, which I'm guessing they were in the original article, but not here. Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:46 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Sounds like you have a love for cats
No, I have a hatred for sport hunting especially when it comes to rare animals. Some of the animals she killed are close to becoming endangered.
quote:
GTFO GFY ETC
Posted on 7/2/14 at 10:46 am to pointdog33
quote:Was the article linked? I think I missed it.
It'd be nice if the environmental conditions would have been noted, which I'm guessing they were in the original article, but not here.
quote:Quite possibly, which is why I want to see the chart prior to 1973. It looks like Zimbabwe has a head start on Kenya. I want the full story before giving that chart the weight others are.
Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:00 am to boom roasted
Hoover institution
Here's the original article from the Hoover Institution. Doesn't talk about any conditions other than populations and economical gains.
I miss not having unlimited access to Journals through LSU.
Here's the original article from the Hoover Institution. Doesn't talk about any conditions other than populations and economical gains.
I miss not having unlimited access to Journals through LSU.
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:01 am to pointdog33
quote:
Zim added 58k elephants to Kenya's 20k from 89 to 11. At almost 3 to 1 ratio says to me Zim is doing something better.
They also started with a larger breeding population. If you have 10 families, chances are they'll produce more offspring than 1 family.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:04 am to pointdog33
Thanks. I'll read when I get a chance.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:05 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Starting numbers don't matter because the populations still aren't reproducing in proportion to each other.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:09 am to pointdog33
quote:
Starting numbers don't matter because the populations still aren't reproducing in proportion to each other.
You don't have enough information to support that statement. Like Boom Roasted said, you need to know what the Zimbabwe population did from a similar starting population. Also, ignoring all other stimulants is faulty. You can't assume all other things are equal unless you have a basis for such. Kenya went through several bouts of infighting that could have resulted in killed animals. That fighting also took resources away from enforcing poaching laws. Did Zimbabwe have similar issues?
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:17 am to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
You can't assume all other things are equal unless you have a basis for such
quote:
Kenya went through several bouts of infighting that could have resulted in killed animals
Isn't this an assumption?
How do we know they didn't start from similar starting points?
I would like to know more of the story as well, but looking at this 38 year survey, Zimbabwe elephants are doing better than Kenya.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:27 am to pointdog33
Hopefully this picture is visible. It clearly shows that at similar population numbers, the growth rates are nearly identical.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:29 am to pointdog33
quote:
If the US didn't have such a hate for horse slaughter we could be eating it's cousin regularly. I have heard donkey steaks are good according to Andrew Zimmern
horse slaughter is legal here again, but needs reform BADLY. its not killing them thats inhumane, its the shoving them into multi decked cattle trailers that are sized for calves and hauling them across country with broken limbs to one of the three processing plants thats inhumane.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:31 am to boom roasted
quote:
Interesting.
Just have to hope I:
quote:
Don't confuse the subject with facts.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:54 am to Galactic Inquisitor
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:58 am to pointdog33
quote:
From the looks of it Kenya isn't following the trend of Zimbabwe though.
Could very well be due to lax laws in Tanzania.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:01 pm to georgia
quote:
horse slaughter is legal here again, but needs reform BADLY. its not killing them thats inhumane, its the shoving them into multi decked cattle trailers that are sized for calves and hauling them across country with broken limbs to one of the three processing plants thats inhumane.
It's legal but funding for inspectors was pulled, which means no slaughter will occur.
Instead congress thinks it more humane to haul them to Mexico for slaughter in their plants.
Laws were put in place back when the video surfaced in California of the cull dairy slaughter house pushing a down cow that prohibit any animal who can't walk in on its own to be slaughtered.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 12:03 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
Keep on correlating 
Popular
Back to top


0





