Started By
Message

re: 1911 purchase/ Glock safety discussion

Posted on 3/13/11 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 3/13/11 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Because a Glock has no means to prevent a fire(intentional/unintentional-whatever) when the trigger is pulled, it does not have a safety


The "external safety" is your finger. The gun will not fire until you put your finger on the trigger and pull it straight back. It has a drop safety that prevents it from firing if someone drops it so the only way to fire it is with your finger. The Glock is obviously safe enough for about 75-80% of the LEA of this country so I don't know how this is even an issue.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 8:44 am to
quote:

The "external safety" is your finger. The gun will not fire until you put your finger on the trigger and pull it straight back.


In other words, it doesn't have a safety.
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:03 am to
quote:

In firearms, a safety or safety catch is a mechanism used to help prevent the accidental discharge of a firearm, helping to ensure safer handling.
Safeties can generally be divided into subtypes such as internal safeties (which typically do not receive input from the user) and external safeties (which typically allow the user to give input, for example, toggling a lever from "on" to "off" or something similar). Sometimes these are called "passive" and "active" safeties (or "automatic" and "manual"), respectively


Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:07 am to
OK, well I'll just remove the safeties from my shotguns and rifles and just make sure to never put my bugger picker on the trigger

Glock apologists are hilarious. The guns make you guys lose all common sense and logic.
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:08 am to
quote:

In other words, it doesn't have a safety.

I already admitted it doesn't have an external safety. It does have a firing pin and drop safety though
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:10 am to
quote:

OK, well I'll just remove the safeties from my shotguns and rifles and just make sure to never put my bugger picker on the trigge


Then you really wouldn't have a safety because those guns don't have internal safeties.

ETA: go look up the definition of firearm safety then come back.
This post was edited on 3/14/11 at 9:12 am
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Glock apologists are hilarious.

What do "Glock apologists" have to apologize for? I could care less if you buy/use a Glock
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:18 am to
quote:

It does have a firing pin and drop safety though
That's great and I aplaud them for that. The trigger cannot be disabled. Call it external all you want, but that terminology is a straw man argument. I don't care about that at all. The gun will fire if the trigger is pulled. That's all I'm saying.
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
18445 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:18 am to
Nice 1911 You got there.

I love my Glock and will buy one more. I also will be buying a Springfield 1911 as well. 9mm Glocks and a 1911.

Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:19 am to
quote:

The gun will fire if the trigger is pulled. That's all I'm saying.


Isn't that the whole point?

I'm not seeing a problem here.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Then you really wouldn't have a safety because those guns don't have internal safeties.
Think about this a minute or two and tell us why that's important. If external is so important to the discussion, then why do externals shut down the trigger? Theyt could easily just prevent the same sort of discharges as an internal.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I'm not seeing a problem here.
Then we agree.
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:22 am to
quote:

If external is so important to the discussion, then why do externals shut down the trigger? Theyt could easily just prevent the same sort of discharges as an internal.


Ok, thank you for stating something I learned when I was 6.

Basically what I'm reading is internal and external safeties prevent the same thing from happening.
So what's the problem here?
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:23 am to
quote:

That's great and I aplaud them for that. The trigger cannot be disabled.


Yes it can. The trigger is disabled and will not move back until the trigger bar is moved back thereby releasing the trigger and allowing it to move rearward.

quote:

The gun will fire if the trigger is pulled.


Well that's what it's supposed to do

Why would you want to pull the trigger without firing the gun anyways?
Posted by tigerbait98
NWLA
Member since Aug 2006
3546 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Nice 1911 You got there.


Thanks.

Shoots wonderfully.
quote:

I love my Glock and will buy one more.


Werent you trying to sell one a while back?
quote:

I also will be buying a Springfield 1911 as well.


The only custom work I had done, that I think is a must have, is the feed ramp (throated and polished).
Completely worth it imo

This post was edited on 3/14/11 at 9:24 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Basically what I'm reading is internal and external safeties prevent the same thing from happening.
So what's the problem here?
Not even remotely true and you know it.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81898 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Why would you want to pull the trigger without firing the gun anyways?
I would not.
Posted by DrTyger
Covington
Member since Oct 2009
22325 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:30 am to
Same goal. Different mechanism.

If you think I'm saying one is better than the other you're way off.

If read my earlier post I own a Glock AND a 1911. As long as the guns do what they're supposed to I have no problem with them. Hell, those are my two favorite handguns in my safe.
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:31 am to
quote:


Why would you want to pull the trigger without firing the gun anyways?

I would not.


So what's your problem with Glock's internal safeties then? The gun won't fire unless you pull the trigger.

FTR I'm not bashing the 1911's external safety. It's just not my first choice
This post was edited on 3/14/11 at 9:33 am
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
18445 posts
Posted on 3/14/11 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Werent you trying to sell one a while back?


Yes, and I did. sold the 40 cal and going with 9mm. I have a G19 and love it. G26 soon to follow.
Cut out the middle man .40. 9mm's and future .45 1911 will be my handguns.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram