Started By
Message
locked post

Will the Govt have to Post Bond To Appeal

Posted on 6/22/10 at 2:47 pm
Posted by bayourant
Homer
Member since Aug 2005
34445 posts
Posted on 6/22/10 at 2:47 pm
For people that do this type of legal work how likely is this

quote:

Word is that the government will appeal. Doing so would put the case in the U.S. Fifth Circuit, widely regarded as the most conservative and pro-business of the nation’s appellate courts. The chances of the Obama administration winning in the 5th, which like Feldman’s court is based in New Orleans, aren’t great.

Furthermore, as the Times-Picayune noted last night in quoting Loyola Law professor Blaine LeCesne, appealing is an expensive proposition.

But LeCesne noted that if the government wants to stay any preliminary injunction, it could be required to post a bond equivalent to the damage faced by the affected parties, such as Hornbeck. “It could be billions,” LeCesne said. “It could be cost-prohibitive to appeal.”

Guess we now know what BP’s $20 billion is for.


LINK /

Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
51542 posts
Posted on 6/22/10 at 3:18 pm to
Awesome. A good ruling and now the administration will throw more money away in the appeals process.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
108494 posts
Posted on 6/22/10 at 3:32 pm to
The government could request leave to appeal without bond, which would likely be allowed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram