- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why haven’t the JFK files been released yet?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to BigNastyTiger417
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to BigNastyTiger417
Now that we know the Kennedy assassination was for all intents and purposes a coup d’etat orchestrated by LBJ and the CIA, what comes next? I mean, many have suspected something along these lines for decades. Now we know those people were right.
Dismantle the CIA?
Dismantle the CIA?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 2:16 pm to Boodis Man
Because the truth would harm too many ultra wealthy people, just like Epstein files.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:17 pm to Darth_Vader
I’m not sure what’s next
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:48 pm to Darth_Vader
Does anyone have a direct link to the AI summaries such as Grok? I see cut and pasted, but going to the link is a guy's Twitter page. Is the actual grok output linkable?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:05 pm to deeprig9
Here's what Grok's official tweet says-
Grok’s summary of the JFK files, released today, March 18, 2025, under EO 14176, aligns with the official narrative: Oswald acted alone. The 80,000 pages, including 2,400 new FBI records, offer no major revelations despite CIA-related details fueling conspiracy theories. Para59r’s skepticism about Grok’s quick analysis is fair given the volume, but the summary reflects current consensus, not a full file review. More time may refine it.
LINK
Grok’s summary of the JFK files, released today, March 18, 2025, under EO 14176, aligns with the official narrative: Oswald acted alone. The 80,000 pages, including 2,400 new FBI records, offer no major revelations despite CIA-related details fueling conspiracy theories. Para59r’s skepticism about Grok’s quick analysis is fair given the volume, but the summary reflects current consensus, not a full file review. More time may refine it.
LINK
Posted on 3/19/25 at 5:23 pm to BigNastyTiger417
Sure it can. Look up Nazi tests on victims for how many full humans a single round can penetrate. You’re counting entrance and exit.
Still NO proof or actual evidence of a 2nd shooter. Period. After 63+ years. Just the same old tired speculation. This is regarding whether LHO shot the shots. There may have been folks plotting or wishing or whatever. Who knows. I’m talking actual evidence of the LHO shots. This has been shown time and time again with recreation after recreation. It is what it is.
And we did land on the Moon. Hehe
Still NO proof or actual evidence of a 2nd shooter. Period. After 63+ years. Just the same old tired speculation. This is regarding whether LHO shot the shots. There may have been folks plotting or wishing or whatever. Who knows. I’m talking actual evidence of the LHO shots. This has been shown time and time again with recreation after recreation. It is what it is.
And we did land on the Moon. Hehe
Posted on 3/19/25 at 5:25 pm to zippyputt
Wrong. The shots fired have been recreated. However, 1 bullet accounting for 7 wounds has not. Also, it takes an expert marksman 2.3 seconds to recycle the weapon. Connelly was hit 1.5 seconds after JFK.
“ House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in 1979, which concluded that there was a ‘high probability’ of a second shooter based on acoustic evidence. New witness accounts in the released files reinforce this possibility, with reports of suppressed testimony from a Dallas bystander who was allegedly pressured into silence by government agents”
“ House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in 1979, which concluded that there was a ‘high probability’ of a second shooter based on acoustic evidence. New witness accounts in the released files reinforce this possibility, with reports of suppressed testimony from a Dallas bystander who was allegedly pressured into silence by government agents”
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 6:55 pm to BigNastyTiger417
Wrong. Your argument holds no water. If the cycling is the only argument that’s pathetic.
Connelly reacts perfectly with being hit by Kennedy’s neck bullet.
Argue with this analysis.
LINK
Connelly reacts perfectly with being hit by Kennedy’s neck bullet.
Argue with this analysis.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 7:16 pm to kywildcatfanone
It isn’t pristine from the back. The bullet tumbled after it exited JFK and kind of flattened upon hitting Connelly. See below.
They’ve done tests of this same bullet being fired from a carcano and they tumble and get deformed just like this.

They’ve done tests of this same bullet being fired from a carcano and they tumble and get deformed just like this.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:21 pm to zippyputt
Wrong. Physics. Simple logic, and the report all favor more than one mediocre shooter. Try again.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:22 pm to BigNastyTiger417

You must be a troll that is doing this for kicks. No way you are serious!
Good grief. 20 pages of science and physics and every argument you made been disproven 10 ways to Sunday by real scientists and physical evidence and recreations. Some people can’t be helped.
I’ll stick with real science and actual evidence shown by myself and others year after year.
Still waiting for evidence you promised of a 2nd shooter. Still waiting. And don’t use “report said there may be two from a motorcycle microphone”. All files released and the AI review essentially said Oswald alone.

This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 10:34 pm
Popular
Back to top
