Started By
Message

re: Why haven’t the JFK files been released yet?

Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
68864 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:01 pm to
Now that we know the Kennedy assassination was for all intents and purposes a coup d’etat orchestrated by LBJ and the CIA, what comes next? I mean, many have suspected something along these lines for decades. Now we know those people were right.

Dismantle the CIA?
Posted by rd280z
Richmond
Member since Jan 2007
2423 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 2:16 pm to
Because the truth would harm too many ultra wealthy people, just like Epstein files.
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:17 pm to
I’m not sure what’s next
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70171 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 3:48 pm to
Does anyone have a direct link to the AI summaries such as Grok? I see cut and pasted, but going to the link is a guy's Twitter page. Is the actual grok output linkable?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
70171 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 4:05 pm to
Here's what Grok's official tweet says-


Grok’s summary of the JFK files, released today, March 18, 2025, under EO 14176, aligns with the official narrative: Oswald acted alone. The 80,000 pages, including 2,400 new FBI records, offer no major revelations despite CIA-related details fueling conspiracy theories. Para59r’s skepticism about Grok’s quick analysis is fair given the volume, but the summary reflects current consensus, not a full file review. More time may refine it.


LINK
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
6465 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 5:23 pm to
Sure it can. Look up Nazi tests on victims for how many full humans a single round can penetrate. You’re counting entrance and exit.

Still NO proof or actual evidence of a 2nd shooter. Period. After 63+ years. Just the same old tired speculation. This is regarding whether LHO shot the shots. There may have been folks plotting or wishing or whatever. Who knows. I’m talking actual evidence of the LHO shots. This has been shown time and time again with recreation after recreation. It is what it is.

And we did land on the Moon. Hehe
Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 5:25 pm to
Wrong. The shots fired have been recreated. However, 1 bullet accounting for 7 wounds has not. Also, it takes an expert marksman 2.3 seconds to recycle the weapon. Connelly was hit 1.5 seconds after JFK.

“ House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in 1979, which concluded that there was a ‘high probability’ of a second shooter based on acoustic evidence. New witness accounts in the released files reinforce this possibility, with reports of suppressed testimony from a Dallas bystander who was allegedly pressured into silence by government agents”
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 5:32 pm
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
6465 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 6:55 pm to
Wrong. Your argument holds no water. If the cycling is the only argument that’s pathetic.



Connelly reacts perfectly with being hit by Kennedy’s neck bullet.

Argue with this analysis.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 6:56 pm
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9222 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 7:16 pm to
It isn’t pristine from the back. The bullet tumbled after it exited JFK and kind of flattened upon hitting Connelly. See below.

They’ve done tests of this same bullet being fired from a carcano and they tumble and get deformed just like this.

Posted by BigNastyTiger417
Member since Nov 2021
4220 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:21 pm to
Wrong. Physics. Simple logic, and the report all favor more than one mediocre shooter. Try again.
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
6465 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:22 pm to


You must be a troll that is doing this for kicks. No way you are serious!

Good grief. 20 pages of science and physics and every argument you made been disproven 10 ways to Sunday by real scientists and physical evidence and recreations. Some people can’t be helped.

I’ll stick with real science and actual evidence shown by myself and others year after year.

Still waiting for evidence you promised of a 2nd shooter. Still waiting. And don’t use “report said there may be two from a motorcycle microphone”. All files released and the AI review essentially said Oswald alone.




This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 10:34 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram