- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Whites at top colleges would go from 66% to 75% if SAT only admission criteria
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:38 pm to tigerskin
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:38 pm to tigerskin
quote:
But in the instances it is deemphasized, it is obvious why
57% of students kicked out in this experiment were white, so tell me what's obvious about it?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:38 pm to slackster
quote:
I'm looking for the person who adds the most to my team
And again, your goal isn't to have a team of the most qualified applicants. Period.
For you the diversity is the goal, justified by some nebulous idea of "the workplace" and its rainbow of inhabitants. Total crap.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:39 pm to CptRusty
quote:
So for all of your "race shouldn't be a factor" BS, at the end of the day, you are still perfectly happy to pass over more qualified white students to meet some race quota.
What are you talking about?
What makes these hypothetical students more qualified?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:40 pm to CptRusty
quote:
And again, your goal isn't to have a team of the most qualified applicants. Period.
My goal is to have the best team. Taking the 10 best individuals based on a single metric like a test score does NOT mean I'll have the best team.
Like I said earlier, why even interview if test scores or a resume are enough?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:42 pm to slackster
quote:
What makes these hypothetical students more qualified?
Hypothetically? Higher test scores and GPA, coupled with identical socioeconomic background and extracurriculars.
By your standards , whitey gets passed over "because diversity"
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:44 pm to slackster
quote:
My goal is to have the best team
Your definition of "best" is "more diverse"
Mine is: optimally fit for task.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:52 pm to CptRusty
quote:
Hypothetically? Higher test scores and GPA, coupled with identical socioeconomic background and extracurriculars.
By your standards , whitey gets passed over "because diversity"
I'm trying to build the most complimentary class possible. Students that will challenge one another in all facets. Accepting another cookie cutter valedictorian doesn't always do that.
In the real world of college admissions, whitey is getting passed over for another whitey with lower scores.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 10:53 pm to CptRusty
quote:
Your definition of "best" is "more diverse"
Among similarly qualified options, yeah, sure.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:01 pm to slackster
quote:
Why wouldn't it be?
I can give you as many reasons against as you could give me for. The point is that the left doesn't like America as founded or the white people that founded it. The white liberals have a self loathing and guilt for being white, but why? There's nothing wrong with the founding of America. We fought a Civil War where half a million people died to right the wrong of slavery. But other countries have had slavery throughout the course of history and they're never discussed. In fact, the warring tribes if Africa would enslave their captives throughout their history. They eventually started selling these slaves to others around the world. No one seems to have a problem with Africans, being ALL black, being proud of their country, but white Americans can't take pride in theirs because there's not enough diversity?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:07 pm to slackster
quote:
A team of all black males or Asian women is unlikely to be as strong as a diverse one of similarly qualified students.
This is a false argument propagated by the communist.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:16 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
This is a false argument propagated by the communist.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:25 pm to slackster
Why is diversity a strength?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:31 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
Why is diversity a strength?
Respectfully, he doesn't know. He's heard it said repeatedly by people he admires, so he trusts it must be true.
This post was edited on 6/24/19 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:35 pm to slackster
quote:
complimentary
Stanford, eh?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 11:36 pm to tigerskin
Affirmative action at its finest. Deny admission to qualified students cause a certain % have to be minorities.
Same goes for the work place.
Same goes for the work place.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 1:13 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
But if reparations are already in place, Democrats can’t buy black votes
The test scores will give you a hint at why...
Posted on 6/25/19 at 1:25 am to CptRusty
quote:
Yes tard, discrimination is wrong regardless of the form or outcome. Try to keep up.
Yet no white people were up in arms about that.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 1:27 am to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
am Ok with the right person getting accepted or hired based on what the university or job qualifications require. Unfortunately over the last 5 to 10 years a more diverse workforce or university may not be better off. Now you throw in a qualified diverse workforce or university then we maybe talking. I know Rome wasn't built in a day maybe it will take time so we shall see. I am open to that.
It makes it impossible to discuss when you keep bringing in the workforce.
This ain’t about that.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 1:28 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:Mr Hangover... you are dumb as shite if you think that a good majority of tigerdropping’s members dont care about this post...
Who gives a shite
Posted on 6/25/19 at 3:36 am to slackster
quote:
I disagree with that approach. If a 1300 is what is needed to succeed, that should be the case across the board.
This is completely BS. Let’s use the NBA because it’s a perfect example. No one is picking the white guy because he has the minimum needed to succeed. That’s not what the academic institutions are trying to do. They are supposed to be pushing to improve and increase intellect. You don’t do that by taking anything but the best.
Furthermore, your whole premise stands on the fact everyone getting in has a 1300. That’s wrong. The issue here is that the admissions really want something like 1350 to be the minimum but certain races can’t get enough so they lower it to 1300 so when those races have candidates with 1275’s getting in it doesn’t look as bad. But the fact is the 1275s have proven to have considerable failure rates.
Your approach is like taking a 6’ Asian guy that knows the game mentally better than anyone else over a pure Athlete. Just because you have the team that has the best basketball IQ doesn’t mean you win championships. It’s actually complete liberal BS that diversity makes a better workforce. There’s actually very very few career fields where that is remotely true, and the vast majority of career fields it’s false and BS. Most career fields the best person for the job has certain criteria, and their race, skin color, sexual orientation, sex, etc. has nothing to do with it.
If I’m in a foxhole surrounded by Al-Qaeda, I don’t want the black chick that got into my squad due to diversity to watch my 6. I want a fricking warrior who was top of the class.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 3:42 am
Popular
Back to top


0






