Started By
Message

re: When are we going to investigate the Department of Education As a Pedo-ring?

Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:09 pm to
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
13570 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

theunknownknight

Mom called. Said put down the comic books, brush your teeth and go to bed.
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:18 pm to
quote:



FWIW it was never as common as it is often said nowadays. Essentially the only situtations where this happened were intra-aristocratic arrangmenents, at least West of the Hajnal line.


Ha. Just a bunch of of drival.

I guess Jefferson taking on a 14yo slave girl as his mistress was "uncommon".

As the OLD saying goes..."If the can bleed they can breed"
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

I’m sorry, but I fail to see some great harm in a 16 year old getting freaky with an older woman.

Maybe it’s because older women (later in life) opened my eyes. If 16 year old me wasn’t irreparably damaged by some 19 year old tang I don’t see what some 33 year old poonany would have been much different



Confused. So whats the difference if this is flipped to younger girl, and older guy??
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:24 pm to
Remember when NYC had a non working school where they put their pedo teachers because the union was too strong to fire them? I remember that from over a decade ago.

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/31494936/ns/us_news-education/t/nyc-teachers-paid-do-nothing/#.XFEm5MZMHCI
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135024 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

Confused. So whats the difference if this is flipped to younger girl, and older guy??


That’s the sticky wicket. I’d say it rests in that the girl can get pregnant.

Now, back in the day that would usually mean a shotgun wedding if it was someone that could provide for her, sending her off to “stay with her aunt” and then her suddenly returning with a little sister if the man wasn’t one of worth.

It’s nature, damnable nature that stirs all these hormones designed to get us to mate after puberty hits. And yes it isn’t fair...but nature is cruel.

Basically boils down to there is a different set of rules for boys and girls.

And let’s not act like a girl in her later teens isn’t able to use her sexuality to get what she wants.

We’re still fighting Stone Age biology in a Brave New World and we don’t quite have a handle on it yet
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20732 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:37 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:09 pm
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

14 and 16 are a vast difference.


Whats the difference as both are able to breed? The fact that we as society says the 16yo can drive?

Morally having sex out of wedlock is the issue. Ages of the wed isnt an issue in the eyes of God. So 2 unwed 20 somethings having sex are sinning, not a 40 yo man having sex with his pubescent wife for the first time on their wedding night. No matter her age.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135024 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Whats the difference as both are able to breed?



Still developing. It’s like a budding rose versus one in full bloom. Those extra couple years mean a LOT. Both physically and psychologically.

Unfortunately aspects of this modern world try to sexualize them so goddamn young.


This post was edited on 1/29/19 at 10:41 pm
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 1/29/19 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Still developing. It’s like a budding rose versus one in full bloom. Those extra couple years mean a LOT. Both physically and psychologically.

Unfortunately aspects of this modern world try to sexualize them so goddamn young.


I agree 100% with the second part, but it's our fault when we try to say it's no big deal when a boy the same age humps an older teacher dirty. Though there are some 14 yos that are way more developed then some 16yos

I heard a radio caller once that was in his 70s that lost his innocence (as he put it) to an older woman when he was like 15. Said it ruined his sexual life as he was nver able to find the same. Strain in his marriage, and he praised his wife of 40-50 yrs for putting up with him when it came to it. So young boys arent developed enough either.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135024 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 1:24 am to
quote:

Said it ruined his sexual life as he was nver able to find the same.


How?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram