- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Value of narrative publications prior to the printing press
Posted on 5/25/19 at 7:29 am
Posted on 5/25/19 at 7:29 am
Anyone know what the literacy rate was like? What would be a modern item comparable in value to that which a copy of the Bible might carry in those days of antiquity?
Posted on 5/25/19 at 7:32 am to ManBearTiger
$350.29 (rounded up from $350.288)
Posted on 5/25/19 at 8:06 am to ManBearTiger
Before printing, the literacy rate was below 10%.
One of the best guides for understanding history is to understand that the world of the past was not a literate world but a visual one. When people in power wanted to communicate a message to the masses, they did so visually. Art. Architecture. Clothing. Jewelry. Public statues. Executions. Lavish events. Tournaments. Monuments.
Depending on the level of detail on the work, a hand-created book represented thousands of hours of work in a scriptorium by dozens of people. It would easily be worth thousands of relative present-day dollars and be out of reach for all but the most elite readers. Churches, rulers, high aristocracy, and universities were the main purchasers of these works. The lecture system that colleges have used for centuries has its roots in professors simply reading books to audiences, who took notes. That was how most people experienced books before printing... most had books or excerpts read to them.
One of the best guides for understanding history is to understand that the world of the past was not a literate world but a visual one. When people in power wanted to communicate a message to the masses, they did so visually. Art. Architecture. Clothing. Jewelry. Public statues. Executions. Lavish events. Tournaments. Monuments.
Depending on the level of detail on the work, a hand-created book represented thousands of hours of work in a scriptorium by dozens of people. It would easily be worth thousands of relative present-day dollars and be out of reach for all but the most elite readers. Churches, rulers, high aristocracy, and universities were the main purchasers of these works. The lecture system that colleges have used for centuries has its roots in professors simply reading books to audiences, who took notes. That was how most people experienced books before printing... most had books or excerpts read to them.
This post was edited on 5/25/19 at 8:08 am
Posted on 5/25/19 at 9:00 am to ManBearTiger
That may have been the case in Europe but in China a good many people were at least somewhat literate during those years. During the Tang Dynasty (about the year 700) they were printing books on paper, using woodblocks, and selling them in the marketplace.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 5/25/19 at 9:04 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
prior to the printing press
The printing press has been around for a really long time
What you are trying to reference is 'moveable type". This is what allowed the printed word to become so much more available. A new plate was not longer needed for each page of printed word
Popular
Back to top

4






