- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US court sentences Ahmaud Arbery killer to life in prison
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:42 pm to Salmon
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:42 pm to Salmon
quote:
Yes it is
Trespassing is a crime. They absolutely knew and had witnessed him committing crimes, and somehow you dispute this while also posting proof that you're aware of it:
quote:
Both times they saw Arbery enter the house, nothing was ever stolen
1
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:43 pm to jchamil
quote:
Yeah, this scenario would have resulted in a life sentence as well
Based on the legal interpretation used in this case, then yeah I guess it would have. That's the problem.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:43 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Based on the legal interpretation used in this case, then yeah I guess it would have. That's the problem.
Wrong
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:43 pm to doubleb
quote:
And I don’t call walking through a house under construction a crime
Ok, but trespassing is a crime whether you call it one or not.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:45 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
Neither would I, but it's still not a felony.
Which apparently means you, as a citizen, can't stop people from trespassing on your property and would be guilty of murder if your attempt to stop them led to their deaths.
Well, at least in Georgia.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:46 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Wrong
I guess we could assume the jury wouldn't find the homeowner guilty in that scenario, but that doesn't change the fact that it would be the same set of circumstances (attempting to detain someone you witnessed commit a "non-felony").
This post was edited on 8/9/22 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:50 pm to shaquilleoatmeal
quote:
Why do you care so much? The utter obsession with the left/right bull shite is a mental illness.
Yea politics doesn’t have anything to do with this trial.
If Ahmaud was white or the shooters were black this would have been a side note on page 10.
I dare you to try to challenge that fact. You can’t and you won’t because you know this case has everything to do with race despite no evidence that it has anything to do with race.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:51 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
They KNEW he had committed crimes in their area and had witnessed it previously.
What crimes did they have direct knowledge of?
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:51 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
If Ahmaud was white or the shooters were black this would have been a side note on page 10.
And the shooters wouldn't be doing life in prison and never would have gotten federal charges.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:52 pm to mouton
quote:
What crimes did they have direct knowledge of?
Trespassing. As has been stated multiple times.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:53 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Trespassing is a crime. They absolutely knew and had witnessed him committing crimes, and somehow you dispute this while also posting proof that you're aware of it:
Again, the idea that you can hold someone at gunpoint every time you see them because you know they've committed crimes in the past is fricking idiotic.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:53 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
but that doesn't change the fact that it would be the same set of circumstances (attempting to detain someone you witnessed commit a "non-felony").
Again, wrong.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:55 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I dare you to try to challenge that fact. You can’t and you won’t because you know this case has everything to do with race despite no evidence that it has anything to do with race.
The case got attention because it was initially covered up by the local DA(s).
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:55 pm to Green Chili Tiger
McMichael deserves to do life, he committed murder.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:56 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Trespassing. As has been stated multiple times.
So trespassing is justification for making a citizens arrest/ holding someone at gunpoint? What about littering?
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:57 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Again, the idea that you can hold someone at gunpoint every time you see them because you know they've committed crimes in the past is fricking idiotic.
Why? That's exactly what the police do. The police are not better than you are.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:57 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Again, wrong.
You not liking it doesn't make it wrong.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:58 pm to mouton
quote:
So trespassing is justification for making a citizens arrest/ holding someone at gunpoint? What about littering?
This guy argued a few pages back that not allowing people to perform armed citizens arrests before a felony occurs promotes lawlessness.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:58 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Why? That's exactly what the police do.
Wrong.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 5:59 pm to mouton
quote:
So trespassing is justification for making a citizens arrest/ holding someone at gunpoint? What about littering?
I have no problem with a citizen holding anyone for a crime they witness. Laws shouldn't only be as strong as the police response time.
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News