- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on George B McClellan
Posted on 12/20/18 at 6:27 am to AU66
Posted on 12/20/18 at 6:27 am to AU66
Lee has two generals do that at Richmond in order to but him, Jackson and maybe another general time to go in the attack.
There seems to be writings that officers on the front had their doubts about the numbers guarding the city, but McClellan stood still.
There seems to be writings that officers on the front had their doubts about the numbers guarding the city, but McClellan stood still.
Posted on 12/20/18 at 7:02 am to athenslife101
McClellan was likely borderline personality. He was a splitting personality, had unstable relationships, a distorted self-image - all borderline characteristics.
He bragged quite a bit in letters about his brilliance and his generaling skills - especially to his wife. He believed himself to be divinely selected to win the war but he was very hesitant to march into battle. And once confronted with his men dying was even more hesitant.
Several times, in each of his stints with the Army of the Potomac, he was duped by earth works that suggested Lee had more men than he had.
The Pinkerton estimates were in later campaigns - early on, it was McClellan and his men that made them. When McClellan was making the estimates, Lee never had more than 50,000 troops - the Little General had 120,000.
McClellan was one of the great organizing and drilling generals in American history. He showed great confidence which his soldiers embraced. But in terms of a fighting general - average to below average.
He bragged quite a bit in letters about his brilliance and his generaling skills - especially to his wife. He believed himself to be divinely selected to win the war but he was very hesitant to march into battle. And once confronted with his men dying was even more hesitant.
Several times, in each of his stints with the Army of the Potomac, he was duped by earth works that suggested Lee had more men than he had.
The Pinkerton estimates were in later campaigns - early on, it was McClellan and his men that made them. When McClellan was making the estimates, Lee never had more than 50,000 troops - the Little General had 120,000.
McClellan was one of the great organizing and drilling generals in American history. He showed great confidence which his soldiers embraced. But in terms of a fighting general - average to below average.
This post was edited on 12/20/18 at 7:06 am
Posted on 12/20/18 at 7:06 am to athenslife101
"...he was purposefully being ineffectual."
He probably understood fricking up a good Army on an unconstitutional war is a bad idea.
He probably understood fricking up a good Army on an unconstitutional war is a bad idea.
Posted on 12/20/18 at 8:27 am to mays
McClellan is the Civil War Montgomery. If you want more background on this, there is an outstanding book called lincoln's lieutenants which goes into all the intrigue in the Army of the Potomac
Popular
Back to top


0





