- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on Derek Chauvin’s sentence?
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:28 pm to sabes que
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:28 pm to sabes que
quote:
Take it easy dude. We disagree on this issue, it’s ok. I bet there are many more we agree on.
No i don’t have time for a serial liar who then starts to change his story.
You started your OP asking a question but you really just wanted to say you are glad Chauvin is locked up because he killed Floyd.
You didn’t want to hear a different story. You made your statement, feel better now?
Im out
1
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:29 pm to LNCHBOX
I see you left out the “experts at trial” part
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:30 pm to sabes que
My thoughts are that I don’t want another thread about this bullshite.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:33 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Not at all, I wanted to have a discussion about intent and how it should factor into law. It’s absurd to me that one could be sentenced to second degree murder without even having the intent of killing someone.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:33 pm to sabes que
quote:
this is not true.
It’s the same truth you’ve been spouting. I.e. your opinion.
The ME included neck compressions as a factor in the death with zero evidence that the neck was ever compressed. “I seen’t it” isn’t evidence, by the way.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:35 pm to Buck Magnum
Want in one hand and shite in the other, see which one fills up faster.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:36 pm to sabes que
quote:
I see you left out the “paid for by St George's family experts at trial” part
FIFY, yea I don't give a frick what they said.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:37 pm to sabes que
These threads are always ridiculous. The same shite gets talked about on every page.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:38 pm to RB10
It’s not true, just because there isn’t post mortem signs of injury doesn’t mean a homicide didn’t occur. That’s not my opinion, it’s fact
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:41 pm to sabes que
Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:42 pm to sabes que
quote:
It’s not true, just because there isn’t post mortem signs of injury doesn’t mean a homicide didn’t occur. That’s not my opinion, it’s fact
That’s not a fact at all. For it to be a legit homicide there has to be evidence. There were no bruises on Floyd. None. There were no abrasions on his neck. None.
Explain to everyone how to forcibly compress someone’s neck enough to kill them without leaving a mark.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:42 pm to LNCHBOX
I believe that. But they are experts for a reason, also there is the video.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:43 pm to sabes que
quote:
, also there is the video.
Where Dr Baker says that Chauvin's knee was not on St George's neck and that his knee did not block the airway?
You're going to downvote testimony from the guy that did the autopsy?
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:44 pm to RB10
It’s absolutely a fact. Death by cutting off one’s oxygen supply doesn’t always leave post mortem signs. and there is the video, so it’s incorrect to say “no evidence”
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:45 pm to LNCHBOX
Where he ruled the death a homicide and said it was due to “neck compression”?
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:47 pm to sabes que
quote:
Where he ruled the death a homicide and said it was due to “neck compression”?
"Neck compression" looks to have just been tacked on to the end based on his actual testimony. I'm not sure how you say death was due to neck compression when you testify that there was no knee of the neck and that St George's airway could not have been blocked by the knee.
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:48 pm to LNCHBOX
And I meant the video of the actual incident, not of Baker’s testimony
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:49 pm to sabes que
quote:
It’s absolutely a fact. Death by cutting off one’s oxygen supply doesn’t always leave post mortem signs. and there is the video, so it’s incorrect to say “no evidence”
It absolutely leaves evidence of its forcibly done. Like, I don’t know, kneeling of someone’s neck.
The doctor you’re latching to admits that the video shows him kneeling on his back and side, not neck.
Maybe you should take your own advice and actually watch the video you linked and stop arguing.
This post was edited on 2/18/22 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 2/18/22 at 1:50 pm to sabes que
quote:
And I meant the video of the actual incident, not of Baker’s testimony
So now you're challenging his findings? What makes you more of an expert than him?
Page 15 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News