Started By
Message

re: Thoughts? Not trying to defend Australia but seems like they are doing something right

Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:24 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84085 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Using a lockdown now with a more mild but infectious variant such as Omicron is more likely to get things 'back to normal' than any of the strategies we've used so far.


Wut?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Lockdowns, by government mandate, are *never* the answer. Period.


Not even for a respiratory pathogen, such as pneumonic Plague, which would have an CFR of near 100%?

In terms of using lockdowns situationally, in the context of a larger pandemic response, my argument is sound. It's personal principles that people object to, but that wasn't the purview of the discussion, and changing the frame is a bit disingenuous.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21896 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:27 am to
quote:

quote:

quote:
U.S.A - 836,000 deaths and counting




I'm sure most of these deaths have other complications than covid. Probably 3/4
CDC director admitted yesterday that 75% of US covid deaths had 4 or more comorbidities

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Not even for a respiratory pathogen, such as pneumonic Plague, which would have an CFR of near 100%?


Yes.

quote:

In terms of using lockdowns situationally, in the context of a larger pandemic response, my argument is sound.


Only from a purely medical point of view. And that's the problem. Using government power to force people to stay in their homes, not visit family members, close their business, etc. is not a medical decision. It is far larger than that.

quote:

but that wasn't the purview of the discussion


It is most certainly the purview of the discussion.

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Yes


I think that's straight up insanity.

quote:

Only from a purely medical point of view. And that's the problem. Using government power to force people to stay in their homes, not visit family members, close their business, etc. is not a medical decision. It is far larger than that.


Well my POV is strictly medical. But the final decision shouldn't be a strictly medical one. I don't even think the initial lockdown response was medical, as much of that was driven by a response to the stock market.

Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3349 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Lol. Even if it was only half, that would still be the worst flu numbers we've had for several years. It's such a nonsensical talking point.



Moreover, it would be the worst flu season by nearly an order of magnitude.

LINK
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I think that's straight up insanity.



I think using the jackboot of the government to confine people to their homes, close businesses, etc. is straight up insanity. Individual liberty trumps everything. As I said, you provide information, you suggest courses of action, you can even incentivize those courses of actions. But never do you force.

quote:

Well my POV is strictly medical. But the final decision shouldn't be a strictly medical one.


The problem is many of the most outspoken medical folks in the media right now very much think it should be. And the politicians are using them to justify their draconian actions.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260423 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:48 am to

quote:

Only from a purely medical point of view.


Medically, an isolation of at risk people would have been proper, if you discount mental health.

There's a reason we don't consult only one segment of society for these decisions though. Our policy makers don't quite understand that.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Our policy makers don't quite understand that.



Oh they understand it very well. The medical community gave them the perfect excuse to do what they did. And are still doing.
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
2536 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:51 am to
Use deductive reasoning next time.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3349 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:53 am to
quote:

CDC director admitted yesterday that 75% of US covid deaths had 4 or more comorbidities


I imagine comorbidities for the flu is similar.

Healthy people don't usually die after a bout with the flu either.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260423 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:53 am to
quote:

The medical community gave them the perfect excuse to do what they did.


Its the policy makers fault for choosing only to listen to the medical community.

I don't blame "science" I blame policy makers.




Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64546 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:54 am to
quote:

The gig is up, oweo. You can pretend to be a biker all you want but we know how many wheels you really have


I believe I’ve provided ample evidence of my biker days (I’ve long since had to retire from that life due to health) and if any doubt remains I’ll gladly provide proof to respell this absurd notion. Just please do not include me with that stunted little worthless shite stain OweO.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:55 am to
quote:


I think using the jackboot of the government to confine people to their homes, close businesses, etc. is straight up insanity. Individual liberty trumps everything


In the situation described, with a pathogen with a 100% CFR, individual liberty doesn't mean much.

quote:

The problem is many of the most outspoken medical folks in the media right now very much think it should be


While true, it's also true that Trump wasn't interested in any lockdown response until there were possible economic repercussions. If there's any blame to lay, where should it be?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260423 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:58 am to
quote:

individual liberty doesn't mean much.


This is where your medical knowledge jumps the shark.

Sorry, individual freedom is paramount and people should be able to choose how they want to treat themselves.

When "medical" people are telling me that my individual freedom doesn't mean much, I instantly recognize they have become political extremists, not medical professionals. Your vaccine does not prevent transmission, my freedom means more to me than yours does to you.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 10:00 am
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:58 am to
quote:

In the situation described, with a pathogen with a 100% CFR, individual liberty doesn't mean much.


It most certainly does.

quote:

If there's any blame to lay, where should it be?


Any government official, no matter what party, no matter what level of government, who advocates a lockdown of any type. Individual liberty trumps safety. Always.



Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 10:02 am to
quote:

This is where your medical knowledge jumps the shark.



The pathogen described assures death for people it infects. Human immunology is such that again, we are connected and have no choice. In that situation, where death is assured if you catch it, that might justify a 'zero-pathogen' approach.

quote:

When "medical" people are telling me that my individual freedom doesn't mean much, I instantly recognize they have become political extremists, not medical professionals.



Thank god I didn't say that. Read the thread.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260423 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 10:04 am to
quote:

In the situation described, with a pathogen with a 100% CFR, individual liberty doesn't mean much.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It most certainly does.


Yep.

Screw the "medical professional" authoritarians. Just more indoctrination. They need licenses revoked.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 10:05 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It most certainly does.



We disagree. You have the right to die, if you want, but again, human immunology connects us together. If you think your own individual rights supersede everyone else's, then I can't get on board with that degree of selfishness. There isn't even an evolutionary argument you can use in this instance.

quote:

Any government official, no matter what party, no matter what level of government, who advocates a lockdown of any type. Individual liberty trumps safety. Always.


Great, but I'm talking about this particular situation where a lockdown was actually used. You are overstating the effect the medical community had and understating what actually happened.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260423 posts
Posted on 1/11/22 at 10:07 am to
quote:

human immunology connects us together


Too bad the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission. There's no reason to give up your freedom for it.

This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 10:08 am
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram