- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Twitter Files: Biden election suppression - “1A not absolute”- Suppl. Update today p39
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:17 am to fightin tigers
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:17 am to fightin tigers
quote:
It's fun to watch people defend the industry and its practices everytime.
This is not at all what you initially argued. Not one person defended slave labor you disingenuous asshat
2
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:20 am to Proximo
Reb said it was in Zambia so there was no slave labor.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:21 am to fightin tigers
And you’re more than welcome to prove it wrong.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:21 am to Proximo
Here are the lies you stated initially. NO ONE defended slavery. We called you out for lying about 1) his father’s business and 2) how Elon funded his start-ups.
There was never a discussion about the virtues of slavery
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:25 am to Proximo
Just saying admit he benefitted off it.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:25 am to Proximo
Clearly fightin Twitter knows more about politics and human rights of 1980’s South African countries than Nelson Mandela 
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:26 am to fightin tigers
quote:
I've already stated that it is what it is when it comes to the mine. Part of the industry. Especially in the +40 year
Show me one reputable link (not reddit, I'm not a fig) that supports your premise.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:26 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Just saying admit he benefitted off it.
Based off of what evidence?
Encyclopedia TrustMeBro doesn’t count as a source.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:32 am to pankReb
Here's a start
Try to read this. I realize you're more comfortable getting your information from websites that have mods who say shite like "UwU" but this is very informative.
Try to read this. I realize you're more comfortable getting your information from websites that have mods who say shite like "UwU" but this is very informative.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:44 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Big tech censoring your speech is literally not a 1st amendment violation, even in collusion with the feds. I know, it sucks, but literally not a violation if it is collusion.
…
Confident that what, a private company working to censor you isn't a violation of the constitution/BoR?. Hard to say why....
Hey ft, remember when I called you out on this stance as well? Elon agrees with me
how does that make you feel?This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 11:45 am
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:45 am to fightin tigers
quote:
a private company working to censor you isn't a violation of the constitution/BoR?.
When its doing Governments bidding, you bet your arse it is.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
Oh he thinks that isn’t unconstitutional as well
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
I've never seen anyone be so consistently wrong with such great confidence in a 24 hour span.
It's pretty remarkable....even for this board.
It's pretty remarkable....even for this board.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:49 am to Proximo
quote:
Elon agrees with me how does that make you feel?
He’s going to be completely irrational towards you now. Never seen a grown man exude the definition of triggered like this guy does over Elon musk
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:50 am to Proximo
quote:
Oh he thinks that isn’t unconstitutional as well
Then he has a very low IQ.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
He's desperately searching reddit for any other reason to hate Elon.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:54 am to Proximo
Taibbi said they were requests, right?
Twitter were forced into doing the censoring? Seems like Twitter was more than happy to do the government (really political party) bidding.
Twitter were forced into doing the censoring? Seems like Twitter was more than happy to do the government (really political party) bidding.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 11:55 am
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:55 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Twitter were forced into doing the censoring? Seems like Twitter was more than happy to do the government (really political party) bidding.
A dem lawmaker even warned them they were likely violating 1st amendment rights.
Posted on 12/3/22 at 11:55 am to fightin tigers
It doesn’t really matter how they’re labeled
It was government direction
It was government direction
Page 35 of 39
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News