Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Texas "Youtube Judge" disciplined for behavior on live court streams

Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:01 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:01 am
TX ABA Journal

quote:

The Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct has issued a public warning for a Texas judge, in part because of public comments that she made through her court’s YouTube channel.


quote:

The commission also found that Boyd “improperly injected herself into the plea bargaining process” in a July 2023 hearing, in which she had rejected a plea agreement submitted by the parties and was informed that defendant Willberth Villamil was withdrawing his plea. According to the commission, Boyd asked Villamil whether he “was willing to accept the 20 years in prison offered by the court” and characterized the case against him as “a ‘life-sentence worthy case.’”

In another October 2024 hearing, Boyd told defendant Thomas Henson that he “was facing 20 years in prison” and directed the court reporter to go “off the record,” the commission said. Boyd, who continued to livestream, then told Henson: “So it appears that you want to go to prison to be passed around for cigarettes or dessert. Because that’s what’s going to happen to you. Because you’re young. And they will think you are attractive at the prison.”


For those who don't know, one of the great things that emerged during Covid was court on Zoom. Certain states (Michigan and Texas in particular, but other states like GA are pretty prolific) live stream a LOT of their court cases.

There are a few TX judges who have become mini celebrities.

Judge Boyd is from San Antonio and I've actually made an OT thread about one of her cases in the past.

Judge Fleischer in Houston was probably the most popular, but I don't think he live streams anymore because the local bar started getting mad at him and election season started up. He's the one with the bowtie you may have seen in a Reel or YT Short.

I have to imagine over time, we're going to start seeing judges disciplined for YT behavior like we see lawyers disciplined for hallucinated AI case law.
Posted by Beessnax
Member since Nov 2015
11317 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:49 am to
I agree that broadcasting court proceedings is controversial however I think that for many people in court this is their first encounter with the concept that there are consequences to your behavior. As a result, if someone watches a YouTube video and learns from it I am ok with it.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9935 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 7:53 am to
Correct me if I am wrong but aren't courts public venues?

And is livestreaming just a modern extension of the public venue?

Livestreaming court proceeding brings more transparency and openness to the process.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Correct me if I am wrong but aren't courts public venues?

And is livestreaming just a modern extension of the public venue?

Livestreaming court proceeding brings more transparency and openness to the process.


She wasn't in trouble just for livestreaming it. She kind of became a celebrity and that may have led her to push her YT character too far....or she was just exposed for doing improper things she always did (and that's a good thing).

I think livestreaming court is a good thing. That's not why she got in trouble.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9935 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:05 am to
Fair. Of what I have seen of Judge Boyd she always seems tough but fair.


Did you see the Gilgo Beach serial killer sentencing?

Seems like the judge on that case got all in his feels during the sentencing. Does he need to be sanctioned for his comments?

Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24872 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

udge Fleischer in Houston was probably the most popular, but I don't think he live streams anymore because the local bar started getting mad at him and election season started up. He's the one with the bowtie you may have seen in a Reel or YT Short.

He’s pretty entertaining
Posted by FlyDownTheField83
Auburn AL
Member since Dec 2021
1811 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 8:20 am to
It is amazing what some judges used to get away with saying and doing in court, having a Livestream of those judge’s proceedings is a good thing.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Did you see the Gilgo Beach serial killer sentencing?

No but I heard about it

quote:

Seems like the judge on that case got all in his feels during the sentencing.

That's what I heard about it

quote:

Does he need to be sanctioned for his comments?


Probably not. It's way too high profile and terrible of a case.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:11 am to
quote:

It is amazing what some judges used to get away with saying and doing in court, having a Livestream of those judge’s proceedings is a good thing.


Exhibit A
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:14 am to
quote:

He’s pretty entertaining


Judge Simpson from Michigan is probably the best I've seen overall. Criminal, civil, prosecution, defense, it doesn't matter. He can be harsh but he's not on a side.

The two from Jefferson County/Beaumont make me not want to get licensed for TX. I have some clients from TX who've gone in front of Stevens who told me the Youtube stuff is no act and he's always been like that.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
13171 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Correct me if I am wrong but aren't courts public venues?

And is livestreaming just a modern extension of the public venue?

Livestreaming court proceeding brings more transparency and openness to the process.


I have always been a fan of this, but I live in Louisiana where all district level cases are not publicly live streamed or available in the media.

I think it is time for the Legislature and/or the LA Supreme Court to lift the veil of district level court proceedings and allow cameras in the court rooms. Most courts even employ security cameras for security purposes or if a defendant is brought in from the jail via a closed circuit feed for an arraignment. One stipulation could be cases involving juveniles, and another would be that the district court is responsible for providing the feed camera angles. The court would allow the media to reuse the feed and the case would be posted on an official district court social media platform.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
480748 posts
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:35 am to
quote:

One stipulation could be cases involving juveniles

Those are already closed and not public elsewhere

I agree, LA's rejection of online proceedings is foolish.

Lots of judges don't eve permit Zoom. They do full on trials in other states but here? Lawyers and staff apparently aren't capable enough.

E-filing alone is foreign to so many old lawyers in LA
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram