- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

'Sugar Daddy' website founder says love is for poor people
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:13 pm
LINK
quote:
The founder of a 'Sugar Daddy' website has said love is for poor people and women look for an older lover because men are "more successful". Brandon Wade set up controversial dating site Seeking Arrangement, which connects young women with sugar daddies, 40% of which are married men. The American businessman, who is hosting the UK's first 'Sugar Baby' summit, claims there are also wealthy women looking for younger men to date. He was joined by Emma Gammer, an experienced 'Sugar Baby' who defended the dating site, but Good Morning Britain's Ben Shephard questioned whether it was "prostitution".
quote:
"There’s also older wealthy women looking for younger men as well. There’s more men obviously but that’s because we have a society where men tend to be more successful," said Brandon as he defended his site's users. "It’s a concept invented by my mother. When I was young and shy and never had a girlfriend she told me study hard and be successful and generous and one day all the woman will flock to you. "A lot of them are lonely and want to date. On many dating websites married men want to be dating." Brandon, who said "love is a fairytale for poor people", turned the concept into a $20million fortune, with his site attracting 5 million users from 196 countries.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:17 pm to RedRifle
Love, marriage, or sugar daddies....we're all paying for pussy one way or another.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:17 pm to RedRifle
It would suck to get rich without someone by your side. Then you know that for the rest of your life, you can be rest assured you'll never know what it's like to have someone who truly loves you.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:18 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Love, marriage, or sugar daddies....we're all paying for pussy one way or another.
Yep
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:19 pm to shotcaller1
quote:
Then you know that for the rest of your life, you can be rest assured you'll never know what it's like to have someone who truly loves you.
Your parents are the only people who ever truly loved you.
All else is conditional and predicated on what you can provide.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:20 pm to shotcaller1
quote:
It would suck to get rich without someone by your side. Then you know that for the rest of your life, you can be rest assured you'll never know what it's like to have someone who truly loves you.
I've seen guys get rich with the love of their life already by their side. When their love subsequently divorced them, taking them for a substantial amount of money in the process, I'd say that's worse.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:21 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Your parents are the only people who ever truly loved you.
All else is conditional and predicated on what you can provide.
Truth. With the caveat that there are even some people who have shitty parents that don't even love them.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:23 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Your parents are the only people who ever truly loved you.
All else is conditional and predicated on what you can provide.
bullshite, there's lots of people in your life that share mutual love with you unconditionally. Siblings, close friends, strippers. All people who love you regardless of what you have to offer then.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:24 pm to LucasP
quote:
strippers
Of all of those listed, at least these are the most honest with their intentions.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 3:38 pm to RedRifle
quote:
love is for poor people
Spicy hot take but that makes no sense whatsoever.
Popular
Back to top
3







