- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff thread: What questions do you have about 9/11?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:11 am to AZTarheeel
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:11 am to AZTarheeel
quote:Contact the person who made the video and ask them.
I just watched a youtube video ( LINK) claiming the second plane was a military drone. Makes sense. My only question is what did they do with the real plane and all the passengers who haven't been seen since that morning? Are they on an island somewhere living it up with all of the passengers from MH370?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:17 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
I'm thinking you believe that the outside of a skyscraper is some impenetrable fortress that is going to cause a massive jetliner to immediately disentigrate, without entering the building at all
quote:Not in any video I've seen. If you have video illustrating this, I'd be interested in seeing it.
They did explode on impact.
quote:That's exactly what came to mind when I watched the planes enter the building and then decide to explode. It's kind of like Wiley E. Coyote running off a cliff and then only after he's realized he's run off the cliff does he fall.
Like what occurs in Cartoon Network shows.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:25 am to TX Tiger
You act like there was a huge lull between impact and massive fireball. It's pretty immediate.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:27 am to TX Tiger
Has any big "conspiracy theory" ever been proven to be true?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:27 am to TX Tiger
How do people still believe in a conspiracy when all the people that were on the planes are actually dead? All the problems with the physics have been addressed by actual scientists to explain that yes, everything we saw was an occams razor situation and not a conspiracy. And how are people so damn stupid to buy into that kind of crap in the first place?? Is it just the bell curve and half the people are too stupid to think?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:28 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
Regardless, these discussions do no good. You will never accept anything presented to you, regardless of how widely accepted in the scientific community it is. Why bring it up on a board like this? I encourage you to venture to r/conspiracy. You can discuss the many secret operations of the U.S. Government (in collusion with big business and Israel, of course) over there
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:30 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:It's pretty immediate after the plane has completely entered the building.
You act like there was a huge lull between impact and massive fireball. It's pretty immediate.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:30 am to Captain Rumbeard
I'm not sure. Conspiracy enthusiasts are kinda feeble minded imo.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:34 am to TX Tiger
Which is literally fractions of a second after initial impact
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:36 am to Rebel
quote:I agree completely.
Conspiracy enthusiasts are kinda feeble minded imo.
Here, I'll give you two examples of the most outlandish conspiracy theories I've ever heard:
1. 19 Muslims took by surprise the greatest and most well-funded military and defense systems in the history of man.
2. A virgin gave birth......to a guy who was murdered and came back to life.......and now lives in the clouds with his Dad.
Conspiracy kooks crack me up.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:40 am to TX Tiger
Well, terrorist/extemists have also taken by surprise the governments of several major powers around the world since then. Smaller attacks, sure, but nonetheless, are those all conjured up as well? Our air traffic controlling procedures and national security for a 9/11 were horrendously unprepared. No shite it's unbelievable. That WHY it happened
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:41 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
They caught us with our pants down, still focused on Cold War era threats. It really isn't that hard to grasp. It happened BECAUSE we were so woefully unprepared and incompetent.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:54 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:Sorry, I'm just not buying your conspiracy theory.
It happened BECAUSE we were so woefully unprepared and incompetent.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 2:58 am to Captain Rumbeard
quote:I agree. Only a conspiracy kook would pretend to know what happened on 9/11 given all the lies we've been fed.
How do people still believe in a conspiracy
quote:The scientists and physics explained YOUR conspiracy theory. What does occams razor say about a lying, cheating, stealing, corrupt government?
the physics have been addressed by actual scientists to explain that yes, everything we saw was an occams razor situation and not a conspiracy.
quote:My thoughts exactly when people spew their outlandish conspiracy theory involving 19 radical Muslims.
And how are people so damn stupid to buy into that kind of crap in the first place??
Posted on 3/14/15 at 3:40 am to CroakaBait
quote:
What would we have all done if Mark Wahlberg went down in the plane he was supposed to be on during the attacks? It's scary to think about.
Charles Koch's dad was scheduled to fly on the Hindenburg on it's final voyage, but something came up and he had to cancel the fight. The world might have been without the Koch brothers if not for fate.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:22 am to Walking the Earth
quote:
I think we're savvy enough about the news media these days to lean towards the side of "they screwed up" over some vast governmental-corporate conspiracy to revise what happened.
Im not saying it's a conspiracy and yes I agree the news is unreliable. That being said the guy was in a helicopter so I would assume he could see the wreckage. Never made a tee shirt over it just makes you say hmmm.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 8:24 am to TX Tiger
I posted in the last thread but since it died I'll post it here.
You likely don't know shite about fighter jets, alert missions, aerodynamics or structural engineering. Why you come here, along with a few others, and run your mouth like you do is the real mystery.
You likely don't know shite about fighter jets, alert missions, aerodynamics or structural engineering. Why you come here, along with a few others, and run your mouth like you do is the real mystery.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:01 am to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
How do people still believe in a conspiracy when all the people that were on the planes are actually dead? All the problems with the physics have been addressed by actual scientists to explain that yes, everything we saw was an occams razor situation and not a conspiracy. And how are people so damn stupid to buy into that kind of crap in the first place?? Is it just the bell curve and half the people are too stupid to think?
Because everything we have been told were lies. One person says thermite was found in one of the buildings and we are to believe that 2 planes took down 3 buildings, one of which was untouched? It came down demolition style. We are to believe that 19 cave dwellers were found 2 hours after the incident, and were trained to fly Boeing 757's after taking aviation courses flying Cessnas?
Many of the victims names have been fabricated by the Govt. Pictures have been altered etc. A plane hit the Pentagon and made a clean hole through a wall? A high ranking militarty officer went public and said it wasnt an airplane. Th whole thing is BS and nothing we have been told is even remotely close to the truth so what really happened we dont know, but I do know that we were lied to.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:03 am to TX Tiger
quote:
TX Tiger
You have to be trolling.
I'm not one to discount gov't conspiracies, inside jobs, etc, and I don't think we'll ever know who was behind 9/11, but arguing that a plane did not in fact hit the towers completely obliterates any type of credibility in your argument.
Popular
Back to top



0






