Started By
Message

re: Spinoff thread: What questions do you have about 9/11?

Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

There is NO frickING WAY the government could pull off a conspiracy of this magnitude


I keep reading this garbage. Please provide a link to anyone in these 16 pages who says the government pulled this off, or please take your strawmen and your conspiracy theories somewhere else.

tia
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

TX Tiger suggested earlier in this thread that he doesn't believe the U.S. Gov't orchestrated the 9/11 attacks.


NOBODY has suggested it did.

But hey, if you catch someone straying from the herd, who refuses to believe what they've been instructed to believe, the proper response is to accuse them of blaming the government.

If this isn't the definition of sheople, I just don't know what is.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

If I truly believed the government did this, I don't think I could stomach living in this country anymore.
And that's why you and people like you get angry when the subject is broached. You can't allow yourself to believe your government could have any involvement in something so heinous.

I know many people like you. You're a good and decent, well-meaning person, you're just scared shitless of the consequences, so you resist and reject any objective dialog on the subject.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:34 pm to
Yeah, you got me pegged alright. I'm shaking in my bed every night before I take my Xanax to help me sleep. So scared of the big bad government, pulling out strings like a giant puppet master.

Posted by Bengal96
Dallas
Member since Sep 2005
154 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to your shitty biased website, and as far as Fox News watchers go, if anything the "truthers" are the ones jerking off to bill oreilly.


Don't then, stop fricking posting. 2300+ Engineers, Architects and Scientists from around the world couldn't possibly be correct. Your just proving my point, there is more facts on that site than you can handle. Biased my arse, its all there and backed up. You can lead a horse to water…….

BTW, frick Bill Oreilly, your so far off its not even worth it
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:39 pm to
I don't care if God told me what happened, I watched a plane fly into the second building, then the building fail and collapse
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

I'm not going to your shitty biased website, and as far as Fox News watchers go, if anything the "truthers" are the ones jerking off to bill oreilly.



Don't then, stop fricking posting.
Like I just said, he's scared shitless of the consequences.

He's not going to look at anything or listen to anybody that might shake him from his comfort zone.

ETA: Not even God...so he says.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 10:50 pm
Posted by Bengal96
Dallas
Member since Sep 2005
154 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Like I just said, he's scared shitless of the consequences.

He's not going to look at anything or listen to anybody that might shake him from his comfort zone.


I have learned this over the years. You hit them with something with substance to go look at and they either scatter like cockroaches or start spewing mindless insults. Ive posted numerous times where the money trail is said to have come from and all the evidence you would ever want to read about controlled demolition and they dont see jack shite.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:56 pm to
Your posts on demolition are circumstantial evidence. We witnessed the planes fly into the buildings- why would anyone believe something other than an airplane caused the buildings to fall?

The simplest answer is often the correct one.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
294200 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:59 pm to
quote:


I have learned this over the years. You hit them with something with substance to go look at and they either scatter like cockroaches or start spewing mindless insults. Ive posted numerous times where the money trail is said to have come from and all the evidence you would ever want to read about controlled demolition and they dont see jack shite.



And the controlled demolition theories have been repeatedly debunked yet you refuse to believe it.
Posted by Bengal96
Dallas
Member since Sep 2005
154 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

We may have killed Bin Laden, but this was overall terrible for us, and their attack reached much further than the people who died on or because of 9/11.


LOL, when did we kill Bin Laden?? Did you see his body? His kidneys were barely functioning before 9/11, so did he go from cave to cave orchestrating these attacks with his dialysis machine??? So we dump a white blanket into the ocean and SEAL Team 6 all of a sudden dies in a helicopter crash after this raid on Bin Ladens compound? Give me a fricking break. This is sickening.
Posted by Bengal96
Dallas
Member since Sep 2005
154 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

our posts on demolition are circumstantial evidence. We witnessed the planes fly into the buildings- why would anyone believe something other than an airplane caused the buildings to fall?

The simplest answer is often the correct one.


Show me the plane that hit WTC 7 causing it to free fall to the ground and I'm done here. Once again your scared to look at the site I posted. There is concrete, not circumstantial evidence that resides there. Like TX Tiger said, your comfort zone will be severely compromised if you were to go watch the evidence. You better get back to the Bachelor.
Posted by Bengal96
Dallas
Member since Sep 2005
154 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

And the controlled demolition theories have been repeatedly debunked yet you refuse to believe it.


Interesting. Im listening. The facts presented by the people on ae911truth are not demolition theories, they are showing the scientific facts behind building collapse and demolition all the while proving the official story is bullshite. So let me know how you debunk physics and science.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

His kidneys were barely functioning before 9/11


How do you know? Did you see him?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
294200 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:12 pm to
LINK

Have at it.

Firefighters feared 7 was going to collapse long before it did.

LINK

quote:

WTC 7 was unlike the WTC towers in many respects. WTC 7 was a more typical tall building in the design of its structural system. It was not struck by an aircraft. The collapse of WTC 7 was caused by a single initiating event—the failure of a northeast building column brought on by fire-induced damage to the adjacent flooring system and connections—which stands in contrast to the WTC 1 and WTC 2 failures, which were brought on by multiple factors, including structural damage caused by the aircraft impact, extensive dislodgement of the sprayed fire-resistive materials or fireproofing in the impacted region, and a weakening of the steel structures created by the fires


There was a bulge from failing connectors long before the building collapsed.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

And the controlled demolition theories have been repeatedly debunked yet you refuse to believe it.



The government put out three stories on how WTC7 collapsed because each conspiracy theory they spewed was more ridiculous than the last one. Not to mention that WTC7 wasn't even covered in the official 9/11 report.

The government put out an initial report on WTC7 that was laughed off so hard that they had to change it. When that conspiracy theory proved to be just as juvenile, they decided to change it back to the first one and said they weren't going to discuss it anymore.

They basically admitted that their final answer was a crock of shite, but you're just going to have to deal with it.

Yeah, I don't see why anyone would have a problem trusting anything they have to say.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19298 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:16 pm to
Why didn't they have their story straight before exploding it?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
294200 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Why didn't they have their story straight before exploding it?


Good luck with that one.

It's a waste of time. These people believe what they choose to believe.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:25 pm to
quote:


Here's the funny thing about it. Truthers say our retarded government was able to pull this off. We rigged the world trade centers with explosives, trained pilots to crash planes into them, blamed it on muslims and got us into war.


A more simple explanation is that (like Pearl Harbor) a select few in our government turned the other way and allowed ourselves to be attacked to help garner public support for a war they did not want.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 11:27 pm
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
37584 posts
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Why didn't they have their story straight before exploding it?
They did, it was laughed off and they had to change it. Can you not read?

Why was there no story in the official 9/11 report?
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram