- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff thread: What questions do you have about 9/11?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:40 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:40 pm to TX Tiger
How is it that we defeated the Nazis and Japanese BOTH in four years, but it's going on 15 years and we can't defeat a band of thugs?
ETA: Who is still buying this "war on terror" charade?
ETA: Who is still buying this "war on terror" charade?
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:44 pm to TX Tiger
If you know government lies, cheats and steals from you, why on earth would you trust them to tell you the truth about something as important as 9/11?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:46 pm to TX Tiger
Why was testimony that contradicted the government's official story, purposely left out of the final draft?
And why was Building 7 not included in it?
And why was Building 7 not included in it?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:47 pm to TX Tiger
Why did the government change its story three times regarding Building 7, before finally concluding with fire as the cause of its collapse?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:49 pm to TX Tiger
As is the way on TD, when questions are asked, the sheople scatter like cockroaches. 
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:51 pm to TX Tiger
It's because you are acting like a crazy person. You just asked like 6 questions and replied to yourself each time. frick man, step away from the keyboard.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:52 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Why did the government change its story three times regarding Building 7, before finally concluding with fire as the cause of its collapse?
Great question- if they had planned it in advance they certainly would have gotten their story straight before.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:54 pm to TheIndulger
quote:Unless it was so juvenile and ridiculous that nobody with a functioning brain bought it.
Why did the government change its story three times regarding Building 7, before finally concluding with fire as the cause of its collapse?
Great question- if they had planned it in advance they certainly would have gotten their story straight before.
Kinda like Global Warming....errrrr...Climate Change.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 4:57 pm to TX Tiger
Only possible explanation for all of this is the government did it. Just like the only possible explanation for crop circles is aliens.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:00 pm to TX Tiger
so the same people in the gubment who made us think we walked on the moon made us think some tall buildings fell? Do they do 'squatch?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:03 pm to TX Tiger
I have 3 questions. The most important to me is why was there no video released of the plane hitting the pentagon, besides the 3 frames that don't show anything even close to conclusive. Its the most secure building on the planet with 100's of cameras, why not release some video to shut truthers up once and for all? The fact that they haven't, along with the size of the hole, lack of debris etc makes me think something up. Again, just release one of the HUNDREDS of videos they took from the Pentagon or even one of the videos they seized from the hotel or gas station across the street. But no they will not and they have protected them from being released under the Freedom of Information Act, why? Just release one, or better yet a few, and all truthers would have to shut up.
The second question I have is about building 7. That defies all logic. I can understand how people can argue the Twin Towers fell at free fall speed because of the weight and fuel etc, even though thousands of top structural engineers say it is impossible, but WTC 7 wasn't hit and only had a fire. No building in the history of the world has ever collapsed at free fall speed before that day when 3 did, Ill but the TT but I would need some serious proof to buy WTC 7.
My third is the lack of wreckage at the crash site of flight 93. That one I don't really care about because I would guess we just shot the plane down and I can see why the government would have lied. Painting the passengers as heroes was much smarter than saying we shot them down. Its obvious to me they lied though. I saw the wreckage and it was NOTHING like any other plane crash I have ever seen ,because there was no wreckage. They found intact paper work from the plane 8 miles away but say the entire rest of the plane and the bodies were obliterated....and a ton of papers survived? Sorry, not buying it. The FBI actually did come out later and said they found the large parts of the plane buried 25 feet under the crater you see in the wreckage pictures.....come the frick on. Plus, they also said the only large part they later found was an engine a "substantial distance away" but they didn't say how far. It obviously was far enough away they didn't find it the first day. Again I am fine with them shooting it down because we needed to protect our country but come on, just admit in now.
I really have no idea what happened on 9/11 but those are the questions I and many others have and the US could at least answer the first in minutes, but for some reason they wont which is fricking annoying because we pay all of their salaries. The ONLY reason not to release the Pentagon videos is for national security reasons and if that is the case what they said happened did not.
All I really know is the official story is not true. They could have really good reasons for not letting the info out but what they said about a lot of the events is pure BS.
The second question I have is about building 7. That defies all logic. I can understand how people can argue the Twin Towers fell at free fall speed because of the weight and fuel etc, even though thousands of top structural engineers say it is impossible, but WTC 7 wasn't hit and only had a fire. No building in the history of the world has ever collapsed at free fall speed before that day when 3 did, Ill but the TT but I would need some serious proof to buy WTC 7.
My third is the lack of wreckage at the crash site of flight 93. That one I don't really care about because I would guess we just shot the plane down and I can see why the government would have lied. Painting the passengers as heroes was much smarter than saying we shot them down. Its obvious to me they lied though. I saw the wreckage and it was NOTHING like any other plane crash I have ever seen ,because there was no wreckage. They found intact paper work from the plane 8 miles away but say the entire rest of the plane and the bodies were obliterated....and a ton of papers survived? Sorry, not buying it. The FBI actually did come out later and said they found the large parts of the plane buried 25 feet under the crater you see in the wreckage pictures.....come the frick on. Plus, they also said the only large part they later found was an engine a "substantial distance away" but they didn't say how far. It obviously was far enough away they didn't find it the first day. Again I am fine with them shooting it down because we needed to protect our country but come on, just admit in now.
I really have no idea what happened on 9/11 but those are the questions I and many others have and the US could at least answer the first in minutes, but for some reason they wont which is fricking annoying because we pay all of their salaries. The ONLY reason not to release the Pentagon videos is for national security reasons and if that is the case what they said happened did not.
All I really know is the official story is not true. They could have really good reasons for not letting the info out but what they said about a lot of the events is pure BS.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:03 pm to TX Tiger
You're fricking asking questions and replying to yourself. You need to take a break from the interwebz.
I'm not answering your questions because you answer every question with a question. You're full of shite.
I'm no longer feeding you, troll. Hopefully others will stop responding to you as well. Then you can reply to yourself for a few more pages and hopefully the thread will eventually die.
I'm not answering your questions because you answer every question with a question. You're full of shite.
I'm no longer feeding you, troll. Hopefully others will stop responding to you as well. Then you can reply to yourself for a few more pages and hopefully the thread will eventually die.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:07 pm to lsu480
quote:Nobody does. That's why I am so amused at these conspiracy theorists who perpetuate the outlandish story of 19 Muslims.
I really have no idea what happened on 9/11
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:23 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Nobody does. That's why I am so amused at these conspiracy theorists who perpetuate the outlandish story of 19 Muslims.
I haven't read any of this thread but IIRC you have had some ideas you felt pretty confident in when posting in prior threads but I could be wrong. I just wish they would have released a tape of the plane going into the Pentagon a long time ago and shut everyone up, if they were worried about offending families they could have stopped it right before it hit but they should have releases SOMETHING that showed it actually happened. That always rubbed me the wrong way considering how many cameras they had there.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:23 pm to Loveland Tiger
quote:
Why every plane in the country was grounded except the plane full of Bin Laden's that was able to get out. And so quickly after the event.
Dude, they won't answer that. Answering this question may require some research. You just told most of these idiots spouting off at the mouth something new.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:24 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
quote:
Did April Gallup lie about there being no plane? Did the on-the-scene news reporter lie about seeing no visible signs of a plane?
The plane flew into the building at very high speed. Why would some woman be able to see plane wreckage on the ground?
Because she was sitting in the place the "plane" struck the building. You'd know that if you had a clue about the subject. But don't let that keep you from pretending you have any idea what you're talking about.
LOL, you beat me to it. Some of these people
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:29 pm to lsu480
quote:
I have 3 questions. The most important to me is why was there no video released of the plane hitting the pentagon, besides the 3 frames that don't show anything even close to conclusive. Its the most secure building on the planet with 100's of cameras, why not release some video to shut truthers up once and for all? The fact that they haven't, along with the size of the hole, lack of debris etc makes me think something up. Again, just release one of the HUNDREDS of videos they took from the Pentagon or even one of the videos they seized from the hotel or gas station across the street. But no they will not and they have protected them from being released under the Freedom of Information Act, why? Just release one, or better yet a few, and all truthers would have to shut up.
The second question I have is about building 7. That defies all logic. I can understand how people can argue the Twin Towers fell at free fall speed because of the weight and fuel etc, even though thousands of top structural engineers say it is impossible, but WTC 7 wasn't hit and only had a fire. No building in the history of the world has ever collapsed at free fall speed before that day when 3 did, Ill but the TT but I would need some serious proof to buy WTC 7.
My third is the lack of wreckage at the crash site of flight 93. That one I don't really care about because I would guess we just shot the plane down and I can see why the government would have lied. Painting the passengers as heroes was much smarter than saying we shot them down. Its obvious to me they lied though. I saw the wreckage and it was NOTHING like any other plane crash I have ever seen ,because there was no wreckage. They found intact paper work from the plane 8 miles away but say the entire rest of the plane and the bodies were obliterated....and a ton of papers survived? Sorry, not buying it. The FBI actually did come out later and said they found the large parts of the plane buried 25 feet under the crater you see in the wreckage pictures.....come the frick on. Plus, they also said the only large part they later found was an engine a "substantial distance away" but they didn't say how far. It obviously was far enough away they didn't find it the first day. Again I am fine with them shooting it down because we needed to protect our country but come on, just admit in now.
I really have no idea what happened on 9/11 but those are the questions I and many others have and the US could at least answer the first in minutes, but for some reason they wont which is fricking annoying because we pay all of their salaries. The ONLY reason not to release the Pentagon videos is for national security reasons and if that is the case what they said happened did not.
All I really know is the official story is not true. They could have really good reasons for not letting the info out but what they said about a lot of the events is pure BS.
These are questions most of us have and they could be answered very quickly with a real investigation. If the story was legit, there would be nothing to hide in releasing their information. Its bullshite.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:31 pm to lsu480
quote:
My third is the lack of wreckage at the crash site of flight 93. That one I don't really care about because I would guess we just shot the plane down and I can see why the government would have lied. Painting the passengers as heroes was much smarter than saying we shot them down. Its obvious to me they lied though. I saw the wreckage and it was NOTHING like any other plane crash I have ever seen ,because there was no wreckage. They found intact paper work from the plane 8 miles away but say the entire rest of the plane and the bodies were obliterated....and a ton of papers survived? Sorry, not buying it. The FBI actually did come out later and said they found the large parts of the plane buried 25 feet under the crater you see in the wreckage pictures.....come the frick on. Plus, they also said the only large part they later found was an engine a "substantial distance away" but they didn't say how far. It obviously was far enough away they didn't find it the first day. Again I am fine with them shooting it down because we needed to protect our country but come on, just admit in now.
The engine was found miles away, which is impossible, unless shot down according to experts. I personally, have no idea.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:33 pm to Tigerwaffe
quote:
Why wasn't the whole thing sniffed out before it happened? We had people on suspected terrorist lists learning to fly planes in the U. S. for no apparent reason. No red flags, no warning bells?
Also: why do people believe a government so inept as to allow 9/11 to happen could somehow pull off the crime of the century (Nov. 22, 1963) to perfection?
Good God people, our government can't keep a post office open, let alone author intrigues beyond the level of a child's prank. Is this not obvious?
It WAS being sniffed out by FBI who weren't involved. They were stonewalled and told not to pursue it. Its all here in this interview for the book I posted earlier. Do yourself a favor and listen to it. For what its worth, this once happy family man is now deceased from an apparent murder/suicide at his home. He was working on a second book.
Link to interview:
LINK
Posted on 3/14/15 at 5:50 pm to lsu480
quote:
I just wish they would have released a tape of the plane going into the Pentagon a long time ago and shut everyone up
to shut who up? the basement dwellers jabbering about it on online forums? The common person probably isn't even aware of these retarded arse conspiracy theorists. It's not like it's some huge movement and people are about to overthrow the government if we don't see proof NOW. The government has no reason to waste time and energy to prove something to a handful of loonies that fricking happened, that people fricking saw.
And herein lies another thing-lsu480, tell me how many conspiracy theorists will see the video, and think, "welp, that proves it right there. There is a plane hitting the building!" No, they would just find a way to say the video is fake.Like always.
This post was edited on 3/14/15 at 5:51 pm
Popular
Back to top



1



