- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Solve this math problem
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:02 am to Spock's Eyebrow
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:02 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
I hate myself for replying to this thread, but the use of the division symbol implies the slash is a fraction bar.
No, it doesn't, only parentheses would imply that a division slash is a fraction bar.
A division sign and a slash have the same effect.
Unless you also expect people to guess as to whether or not the "9-3" and/or the "+1" are also part of the same fraction, which they aren't.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:09 am to LSUBoo
quote:
A division sign and a slash have the same effect.
Why go out of your way to use the division sign on a computer keyboard if the slash means the same thing? If you're going to be cute, I'm going to be cute.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:11 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
Why go out of your way to use the division sign on a computer keyboard if the slash means the same thing? If you're going to be cute, I'm going to be cute.
Ignoring order of operations isn't cute, it's just wrong. Without grouping symbols, the answer is 9.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:12 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:Because the OP doesn't understand the syntax necessary to represent the problem correctly.
Why go out of your way to use the division sign on a computer keyboard if the slash means the same thing?
As lsuboo stated, the +1 could fall under the fraction then it becomes 1/4, and the answer is now -3.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:20 am to LNCHBOX
Not even going to wade into this problem, but has anyone noticed how all of the most heated math problems on the OT usually have at least one division sign and no parenthesis?
Just seems to be a common trend...
Just seems to be a common trend...
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:20 am to buckeye_vol
quote:
As lsuboo stated, the +1 could fall under the fraction then it becomes 1/4, and the answer is now -3.
Actually, 9-3÷1/3+1 would group as (9-3÷1)/(3+1).
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:21 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Not even going to wade into this problem, but has anyone noticed how all of the most heated math problems on the OT usually have at least one division sign and no parenthesis?
Just seems to be a common trend...
You should have seen the original problem OP posted. Absolutely no way to get an answer other than 9, and still people arguing about it.
Had one genius saying we need to worry about intent before answering a math problem. This thread has been money.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:22 am to Spock's Eyebrow
To intentionally be a dickhead and troll Facebook and message boards.
There is no such thing in math as a "fraction bar." That is a term by used by grade school teachers to teach grade school students who are just getting their feet wet with this stuff. 1/3 is a mathematical expression.
There is no such thing in math as a "fraction bar." That is a term by used by grade school teachers to teach grade school students who are just getting their feet wet with this stuff. 1/3 is a mathematical expression.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:22 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
Actually, 9-3÷1/3+1 would group as (9-3÷1)/(3+1).
How did you come up with that arbitrary grouping?
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:23 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
Actually, 9-3÷1/3+1 would group as (9-3÷1)/(3+1).
No, it wouldn't.
It wouldn't group at all.
However, (9-3÷1)/(3+1) at the very least would be more correct (based on historical math syntax) than 9-3÷(1/3)+1.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:30 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
How did you come up with that arbitrary grouping?
It makes sense, unlike 9-3÷1/(3+1) that others suggested could be a valid alternative interpretation. One could make the precedence of slash lower than the other operators and write a grammar for this hypothetical system.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:32 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
It makes sense
No it doesn't. There are no grouping symbols, so why randomly pick that grouping?
quote:
valid alternative interpretation
There is only one "interpretation." And that results in an answer of 9. Anything else is making assumptions that change the problem.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
No it doesn't. There are no grouping symbols, so why randomly pick that grouping?
It makes sense, and it isn't random. Go back and read the discussion.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:34 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:
It makes sense, and it isn't random. Go back and read the discussion.

Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:36 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
No it doesn't. There are no grouping symbols, so why randomly pick that grouping?
Historically, that could be one way to look at it, with everything to the left of the / as the numerator, and everything to right as the denominator.
That's an outdated approach though, and is no longer a valid solution.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:39 am to Spock's Eyebrow
quote:So you would get an answer of 1.5 then so however you want to "group" the fraction, it shows that it's incorrect.
Actually, 9-3÷1/3+1 would group as (9-3÷1)/(3+1).
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:40 am to LSUBoo
When was it ever a valid solution to randomly group shite together in a math problem?
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:40 am to TigerBait2008
Another shite post from the king of shite posts.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:41 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
When was it ever a valid solution to randomly group shite together in a math problem?
I didn't say anything about randomly grouping.
And I'm talking 100 years ago... so like I said... no longer a valid solution.
Popular
Back to top
