- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:34 am to Meauxjeaux
24-hour news energy. Marketing and ad sales rule the atmosphere.
Jim Cantore can make a paper bag sound dangerous.
Jim Cantore can make a paper bag sound dangerous.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 8:34 am to Meauxjeaux
Friend,
One cannot underplay the accuracy of this statement. This system on satellite and radar did not have the appearance of a tropical storm. Over the years I have watched multiple tropical depressions look more impressive than did Arthur. It may indeed be fraudulent when the NHC named this cluster of thunderstorms a tropical storm. In doing so, the NHC has likely saved insurance companies millions of dollars, as named storm deductibles are higher than non-named weather event deductibles.
Can anyone provide evidence that this system had a one minute sustained wind at ten meters of 45 MPH? The strongest sustained wind I found evidence for was 43 MPH from Buoy 42035 off the coast of Galveston. If such a recording exists to support a tropical storm, that anemometer needs to be examined and verified by an impartial third party.
If there cannot be produced real evidence that this system met the parameters of a tropical storm, there should be a Congressional investigation into the methods behind the NHC naming storms as well as an investigation into any conflicts of interest the NHC and its employees have with the home insurance industry.
Yours,
TulaneLSU
quote:
What a fraud perpetrated by NWS naming this thing.
One cannot underplay the accuracy of this statement. This system on satellite and radar did not have the appearance of a tropical storm. Over the years I have watched multiple tropical depressions look more impressive than did Arthur. It may indeed be fraudulent when the NHC named this cluster of thunderstorms a tropical storm. In doing so, the NHC has likely saved insurance companies millions of dollars, as named storm deductibles are higher than non-named weather event deductibles.
Can anyone provide evidence that this system had a one minute sustained wind at ten meters of 45 MPH? The strongest sustained wind I found evidence for was 43 MPH from Buoy 42035 off the coast of Galveston. If such a recording exists to support a tropical storm, that anemometer needs to be examined and verified by an impartial third party.
If there cannot be produced real evidence that this system met the parameters of a tropical storm, there should be a Congressional investigation into the methods behind the NHC naming storms as well as an investigation into any conflicts of interest the NHC and its employees have with the home insurance industry.
Yours,
TulaneLSU
Popular
Back to top


0




