Started By
Message

re: Public Service Reminder: How to React when Being Confronted by Police

Posted on 4/2/18 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 9:59 pm to
Nah the bit in the OP is from 2014.
Posted by nateslu1
Mr. Belvedere Fan Club
Member since Apr 2012
6938 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:13 pm to
You've got to be kidding. This is obviously a one-off scenario.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

You've got to be kidding. This is obviously a one-off scenario.


Maybe you missed the class action lawsuit and multiple plaintiffs?

Ok lets pretend it was a one off scenario. What do you think about this?

quote:

On Oct. 20, 2005, Gonzalez says he was driving south on U.S. Highway 281 from Austin to Brownsville to look at a car and buy a gravestone for his dying aunt. Gonzalez, who owns a car lot, was carrying $10,032 in a briefcase.

"As I was driving south, I noticed a dark bluish unmarked car that was taking radar. He basically got behind me, followed me for a while," he says.

About 90 miles north of the Mexican border, two sheriff's deputies of the Jim Wells County Task Force pulled him over for driving without a front license plate.

"He asked me to get out of the car. I did," Gonzalez says. "He asked me for my driver's license and insurance. I gave it to him. He asked me if I had weapons, drugs or large amounts of money. I told him I did."

The police video shows Gonzalez with a shaved head, wearing baggy shorts, standing beside a Mazda. The incident report states the deputies grew suspicious when Gonzalez and his passenger both appeared nervous, and a drug-sniffing dog signaled the presence of drugs. The deputies took them in for questioning and searched the car. They found no drugs or weapons. Though Gonzalez said he was a businessman and showed them a credit card printed with the name of his car lot, the officers didn't believe him.

"He suspected we were using the money to go south and buy drugs," he says.

The deputies handed Gonzalez a waiver: If he signed over the money and did not claim the currency, he could walk away free. If he did not sign the waiver, he would be arrested for money-laundering. Gonzalez signed the waiver and gave up rights to his money.

LINK

Or this

Oklahoma police return $53,000 after stealing it from Christian orphanage

Or

quote:

For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.

The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

“How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”

The federal government does.

Using a law designed to catch drug traffickers, racketeers and terrorists by tracking their cash, the government has gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes. The government can take the money without ever filing a criminal complaint, and the owners are left to prove they are innocent


When the IRS doesnt like how much you deposit in your bank account, they can take it all

Or my personal favorite:

quote:

The nightmare began when police showed up at the house and arrested their 22-year-old son, Yianni, on drug charges -- $40 worth of heroin. Authorities say he was selling drugs out of the home. The Sourvelises say they had no knowledge of any involvement their son might have had with drugs.
A month-and-a-half later police came back -- this time to seize their house, forcing the Sourvelises and their children out on the street that day. Authorities came with the electric company in tow to turn off the power and even began locking the doors with screws, the Sourvelises say. Authorities won't comment on the exact circumstances because of pending litigation regarding the case.
Police and prosecutors came armed with a lawsuit against the house itself. It was being forfeited and transferred to the custody of the Philadelphia District Attorney. Authorities said the house was tied to illegal drugs and therefore subject to civil forfeiture.
In two years, nearly 500 families in Philadelphia had their homes or cars taken away by city officials, according to records from Pennsylvania's attorney general.
Authorities use a civil forfeiture law that allows them to seize people's property when that property is connected to the sale of illegal drugs.
CNN legal analyst and consumer attorney, Brian Kabateck, says the law is intended to protect the public. "It discourages crime and it takes the ill-gotten gains away from the bad people."
But not all people who have their property taken away are charged with a crime. Unlike criminal forfeiture, the civil law allows authorities to seize property without the owner ever being convicted or even charged.


LINK

I have lots more too...

Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
26319 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:06 pm to
I remember downloading this clip on Morpheus 15 years ago and having a good laugh. Still funny today. Much like this one LINK
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7881 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Ok lets pretend it was a one off scenario. What do you think about this?

Each one of those is just awful, and I commend you for publicizing such BS perpetrated by out of control authorities (mostly federal, in your examples).

However, for every one of those you list, there are 50,000+ interactions between a policeman and a minority... and a little politeness, courtesy and respect shown to the officer would go a long way. Not to mention fast movement toward a waistband to get a cell phone.

I'm not saying to lay down and give up one's rights. Just
- use some common sense
- shut the frick up
- don't bring a mad bitch
- obey the law
- etc.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135036 posts
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Dont tell that to anyone that thinks a police officer that might be coming to confiscate someones gun.



Completely different scenario
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 4/3/18 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Completely different scenario


Acting under the color and force of law?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram