Started By
Message

re: Proposed public takeover of PG&E

Posted on 12/6/19 at 9:41 am to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97899 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 9:41 am to
Lol NorCal is a shitehole
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41011 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 9:54 am to
quote:

The environmental policies that these same politicians put in place is what has PG&E the dumpster fire it is. Giving even more control to call the shots is the equivalent of adding gasoline to said dumpster fire.


I'm confused as to how a co-op would give more power to the government. Co-ops are independent of the government, they are just member-owned instead of owned by stockholders.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150275 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 10:09 am to
Wouldn’t this put more decision making in the municipal officials hands?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41011 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Wouldn’t this put more decision making in the municipal officials hands?


Not if it's a co-op... a co-op is owned by the members.

What you may be thinking of, would be if a local government took over the entity, which I don't see happening just due to the size and locations covered.

I guess the state could try to take it over, which I would be 10,000 percent against.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150275 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:


But the cooperative structure, promoted during the Great Depression to electrify the nation’s rural areas, has not been done at the scale of PG&E, which serves 5.4 million electric customers across 70,000 square miles.

Not all cities and counties in PG&E’s vast service territory stretching from Bakersfield to the Oregon border are on board with the cooperative idea. Most conspicuous among them is San Francisco, which has sought to acquire PG&E’s transmission network and run it as a municipal utility. The San Francisco mayor’s office, however, said it does not consider the cooperative proposal “mutually exclusive” to its own plans.

With the exception of Humboldt County, the officials backing the cooperative proposal were not expressing formal support of the governments of the cities and counties they represent.

PG&E has rejected San Francisco’s grid purchase offer as insufficient, as well as the cooperative idea, stating that its “facilities are not for sale, and changing the structure of the company would not create a safer operation.”

Others, including those who support turning all or parts of PG&E into a government-run power utility like those serving Sacramento and Los Angeles, have questioned whether the cooperative structure, operating as a private nonprofit, would serve the public better

Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/6/19 at 10:53 am to
quote:

keep up with the commie bull shite


lots of cities own electric.


All over the usa.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram