Started By
Message

re: Philando Castile shooting dashcam video released - NSFW

Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:09 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137030 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

You're assuming Castille reached for his gun. He let the officer know he had a firearm.

He did not let the officer know he had a gun as soon as contact was made. He only let the cop know as he was already reaching for his information.
quote:

It is likely Castille was reaching for his wallet/insurance--not the gun. 


How the hell is the cop supposed to know that?
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 11:11 am
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I've listened to this at high volume on headphones at least 20 times.


Perhaps that high volume over time has damaged your hearing.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:25 am to
quote:

The issue is that what happened to Philando Castille in all likelihood would not have happened had he instead been a white girl from the burbs.

You know it. I know it.
This is true, but a few things are in play, not saying you insinuated any, but just throwing these out.

1That doesn't automatically mean it's a racial thing. I'm sure it's just fact that officers deal with more unruly black males than white girls from the burbs.

I mean, I'd expect an officer to be more on guard going through a crime riddled neighborhood in Chicago than some wealthy neighborhood, you're just playing the odds, something everyone of us do in all walks of life, but certainly when it comes to something safety related.

We can say cops should do this or that, but they're human. Just like if you're walking with your family/young kids and see a group of 5 guys who just look "mean" if you will, you'll be on guard a bit more than if you saw 5 preppy looking chicks looking like they're straight out of Clueless. You'll never be able to train that out of cops IMO. And if you do, more cops will be harmed as a result, right?



Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
23224 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Perhaps that high volume over time has damaged your hearin


Maybe. I actually just slowed it down to half speed and it DOES sound more like he's saying "I'm not pulling it out"...crazy. Then I put it back to normal speed, and it sounds like "I'mma have to pull it out." Regardless. Like I said earlier, even if he said that, it doesn't mean the officer didn't see him reaching for his gun.

Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32914 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:28 am to
None of that means that the cop shouldn't be held accountable when they frick up though, which is the case here.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Police officers should be granted the utmost respect in our society and be given the tools necessary to do their job (training, equipment, etc.). We should reward them handsomely for their sacrifice
Honest question, do you think all cops are adequately trained for these situations?

If not, how do you really handle when a cop screws up(nothing super obvious, i'm talking a somewhat gray area like this very example) how much can you really hold him accountable?

It's a really tough situation that I don't know that anyone really has the answers to, it seems.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

o me, it sounds more like he said "I'mma have to pull it out",
I listened to that part what feels like a million times and posted probably 2+ days ago what I thought it sounded like, and it's literally the exact quote you said, "I'm a have to pull it out."

That's how I heard it.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282255 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:31 am to
Classic case of a cop panicking.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

None of that means that the cop shouldn't be held accountable when they frick up though, which is the case here.

I don't even know if this makes sense or is contradictory, but I feel like this situation is one where the cop should probably never be a cop again, but also can see why and agree(based on what I know, which is obviously not all the evidence) that he was found not guilty. There's reasonable doubt, just because we have no clue what was going on inside the car, only speculation.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:

When you say "context" what you meant was his age and race.
You'll never train that out of all cops, or anyone for that matters.

Cops are people, people aren't robots. They're going to play the odds, just like you would play the odds with your family/children. And while race is a factor, it's not always race related, it's safety related.

If I saw a group of 5 skinheads with Nazi tats on their face walking my way, I'd be on the same level alert with my family as if i saw any 5 black/asian/hispanic dudes.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282255 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:42 am to
The cop panicked, he's in the wrong business
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112430 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:44 am to
quote:

The cop panicked, he's in the wrong business

I already said that, not sure why you're repeating yourself.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

even if he said that, it doesn't mean the officer didn't see him reaching for his gun.


The cop misjudged what he saw.

PC misjudged the cop's itchy trigger finger after essentially being told the cop was cool with the gun as long as he didn't reach for it, which he didn't.

Maybe if the cop had told him, "Stop what you're doing and put your hands on the steering wheel" instead of repeatedly telling him not to do what he already wasn't doing, things would have turned out differently.

The cop was far too casual about the admission of the firearm. He needed to give precise instructions as to what PC was to do. PC thought he was complying, yet he still ended up dead, with his girlfriend and the little girl lucky to come out of it alive. Cop failed to control the situation.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137030 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

PC misjudged the cop's itchy trigger finger after essentially being told the cop was cool with the gun as long as he didn't reach for it, which he didn't.

Sorry, but assuming this is completely absurd and unreasonable.
quote:

Maybe if the cop had told him, "Stop what you're doing and put your hands on the steering wheel" instead of repeatedly telling him not to do what he already wasn't doing, things would have turned out differently.

Yes, he probably should've told him to put his hands on the wheel.
quote:

The cop was far too casual about the admission of the firearm.

Not really. Was he supposed to start yelling at the guy immediately? He unholstered his weapon when PC told him about the gun. That's not "being casual".

Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35593 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:11 pm to
Wrong
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Sorry, but assuming this is completely absurd and unreasonable.


It's not an assumption. It's a conclusion based on what was said and the context of the stop up until the point when the cop flipped out and emptied his pistol into the car, with the girlfriend and child passengers lucky to come out of it alive. Nothing preceding that leads me to believe PC was about to get into a shootout with the cop.

quote:

Not really. Was he supposed to start yelling at the guy immediately? He unholstered his weapon when PC told him about the gun. That's not "being casual".


Calmly telling someone "Don't reach for it" instead of giving clear instructions like "Stop what you're doing and put your hands on the steering wheel" is being casual. Christ, the cop didn't even relay the revelation about the firearm to his partner standing on the other side of the car.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
59025 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:21 pm to
Did he have his hand on or not?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137030 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

It's not an assumption. It's a conclusion based on what was said and the context of the stop up until the point when the cop flipped out and emptied his pistol into the car, with the girlfriend and child passengers lucky to come out of it alive. Nothing preceding that leads me to believe PC was about to get into a shootout with the cop.

That's because you're watching it and analyzing it sitting in front of a computer. This guy didn't have a realistic timeline to process and analyze the situation like we do. Put in real time context, it was absolutely reasonable for him to assume that PC could potentially be going for a gun.

quote:

Calmly telling someone "Don't reach for it" instead of giving clear instructions like "Stop what you're doing and put your hands on the steering wheel" is being casual. Christ, the cop didn't even relay the revelation about the firearm to his partner standing on the other side of the car.

Like I said, he should've used different language, but his tone was not too casual. Having you unholstered means you are taking the situation seriously.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 12:37 pm
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
23224 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

The cop misjudged what he saw


How do you know this?

quote:

PC misjudged the cop's itchy trigger finger after essentially being told the cop was cool with the gun as long as he didn't reach for it,


I agree

quote:

which he didn't


Again, how do you know this?

quote:

Maybe if the cop had told him, "Stop what you're doing and put your hands on the steering wheel" instead of repeatedly telling him not to do what he already wasn't doing, things would have turned out differently.


Yep.

quote:

The cop was far too casual about the admission of the firearm. He needed to give precise instructions as to what PC was to do. PC thought he was complying, yet he still ended up dead, with his girlfriend and the little girl lucky to come out of it alive. Cop failed to control the situation.


quote:

He needed to give precise instructions as to what PC was to do. PC thought he was complying, yet he still ended up dead, with his girlfriend and the little girl lucky to come out of it alive. Cop failed to control the situation.


I agree. Which is why he may lose a civil suit, especially if he didn't follow police protocol when dealing with an armed person for a normal stop.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17035 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Here is a hyphen (-). Use it.


I'm posting from a phone, so get over it.

Also, thanks for the non-substantive retort. Hey, I even put a hyphen in there for you.
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram