Started By
Message

re: Opposition to Solar Project in Iberville Parish

Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:17 am to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:17 am to
Several chem plants.

A lot that buy up surrounding properties and convert the land to buffer area rather than agriculture.

The Parish President sounds like he is virtue signalling.

There is a reason Iberville is a shithole with some of the lowest income and education. Decisions like this.
This post was edited on 9/16/23 at 9:20 am
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:18 am to

Hmm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21274 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:19 am to
quote:

So, what industry is in the parrish exactly?


Petrochems and lots of sugarcane.
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5520 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:20 am to
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21274 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:22 am to
quote:

A lot that buy up surrounding properties and convert the land to buffer area rather than agriculture.



A lot of other petrochem companies that buy up land for buffers actually do lease it out to crop farmers and/or cattle grazers. They just don’t want people living too close to them for liability reasons should there be an accidental release or God forbid an explosion, but have absolutely no problem with a farming or grazing tenant on their lands.

That is a fact. Goes on all over the Permian Basin as well.
This post was edited on 9/16/23 at 9:25 am
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:25 am to
Solar farms don't need any buffer areas to have in limbo though.
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
12995 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:29 am to
the only one who benefits from this is Entergy and their ESG score that no one with a logical brain actually gives a frick about
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21274 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Solar farms don't need any buffer areas to have in limbo though.


No, and like I’ve said, not opposed to them.

But putting them in an area that takes food crops out of rotation is dumb.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12526 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:33 am to
It’ll be funny when the NIMBYs get their way then the land owners say frick it and sell it to China.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65779 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:40 am to

Or Bill Gates. There's a thread about that a few times per year.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12526 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Or Bill Gates. There's a thread about that a few times per year.
Yep. Gotta love an a-hole who tells someone they can’t do something on their land then expects them to keep paying taxes and upkeep on it.
This post was edited on 9/16/23 at 9:45 am
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:45 am to
quote:

But putting them in an area that takes food crops out of rotation is dumb.



Is it private property?
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27430 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:48 am to
quote:

What tf is this BS? And people wonder why we are #49 /50 on every negative national ranking.


...are you an idiot? Or simply a poor person who doesn't own any land?

quote:

This state don’t want any positive change


Oh... an idiot.



There is NOTHING positive about a solar farm.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21274 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Is it private property?


It is and the surface owner has every right to do what he or she wants with their property. Or should.

Doesn't mean I have to like it, though.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12526 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Doesn't mean I have to like it, though.

That’s fair.

Trying to stop the development or even supporting that effort is a different story. frick those people.
This post was edited on 9/16/23 at 11:18 am
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
39155 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 10:03 am to
They built a lot of solar in my county in FL. Each month this summer has been a record-breaking electric bill for me. They just voted themselves another rate increase. Having thousands of solar panels has not helped anything. The a-holes that always beat on my door to sell me solar panels tell me they MUST go on my roof instead of at the bak of my yard, in frames like the electric companies have theirs in.

This is the salesman when I say I do not want holes in my new roof.

"There will be no electric when you're living in a van down by the river."



Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12526 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 10:08 am to
quote:

The a-holes that always beat on my door to sell me solar panels tell me they MUST go on my roof instead of at the bak of my yard, in frames like the electric companies have theirs in.

Those idiot door knockers just don’t like ground mount EPCs. If you have the room there’s no reason you can’t do it and plenty of the big boys will even finance them if you want.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27430 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 10:11 am to
quote:

surface owner has every right to do what he or she wants with their property.


I agree with you if that's a person who owns it.

I disagree with you if it's a corporation specifically targetting fertile land.

Make no mistake, solar is the future. Solar farms are not. I think there are a lot more steps between coal and solar. Specifically nuclear.

A tesla roof would easily supply all of my electrical needs while likely being more durable than asphalt shingles.
This post was edited on 9/16/23 at 10:16 am
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12526 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 10:13 am to
quote:

specifically targetting fertile land.

This isn’t a thing. The factors for selecting any power plant location is exclusively dictated by interconnection, grid congestion and ROI.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 9/16/23 at 10:14 am to
I would imagine they are targeting cheap land regardless of fertility.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram