- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ochsner CEO sees $130M loss in two months amid coronavirus fight
Posted on 5/4/20 at 12:56 pm to castorinho
Posted on 5/4/20 at 12:56 pm to castorinho
As a society, if we renamed "non-profit" institutions to "non-tax paying" institutions, it would be more honest and clear. They still have revenue and profits, they just don't pay taxes on the profits. I also think the term "non-profit" makes it sound like they're accomplishing some benevolent mision and the definition of a non-profit needs to be reigned in.
If you care about whatever you're buying, be it health care or any other goods or services, I would much rather go to a for-profit hospital than a non-profit. The for profit business will always deliver a better and more efficient service than a non-profit competitor.
If you care about whatever you're buying, be it health care or any other goods or services, I would much rather go to a for-profit hospital than a non-profit. The for profit business will always deliver a better and more efficient service than a non-profit competitor.
1
Posted on 5/4/20 at 3:58 pm to GoIrish02
quote:
I would much rather go to a for-profit hospital than a non-profit. The for profit business will always deliver a better and more efficient service than a non-profit competitor.
What about Mass General, Cedars-Sinai, Mayo, MD Anderson, Brigham & Women's, Kaiser, etc?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News