- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/29/14 at 4:58 pm to CAD703X
quote:She also has no symptoms, chief.
there's a 21 day incubation period there hoss.
quote:It's that attitude that has the government slowly taking away more and more of our rights, no matter how small they may be.
fricking bitch can spend 21 days browsing pinterest and eating bon-bons. its not the end of the world.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:00 pm to shel311
typo but then i kinda liked what i did there so i left it
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:00 pm to JG77056
quote:No, she will, you're moving from your original point though.
So if she starts vomiting 4 days from now she won't have a chance to infect anybody?
You may get HIV tonight if you have sex, so let's let the government quarantine from having more sex, right?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:00 pm to WeeWee
quote:
but I would feel fine seating next to her on a plane or bus.
I don't believe you. You're telling me that if you had the choice to sit next to her or someone that didn't treat ebola patients for a month you would have no preference? You're lying and we all know it.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:01 pm to shel311
quote:
It's that attitude that has the government slowly taking away more and more of our rights, no matter how small they may be.
i disagree.
1. ebola hyperbole has reached epidemic hysteria..it leads off just about every newscast.
2. 3 or 4 cases have everyone in the nation on edge.
3. all they are asking is she chill at home for a few more days (she's probably a week or 2 into the 21 days already right?)
so they're not FORCING her to do anything..she's the one that said "i will not sit here and avoid people".
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:02 pm to Al Dante
quote:Ok, but why is this relevant?
I don't believe you. You're telling me that if you had the choice to sit next to her or someone that didn't treat ebola patients for a month you would have no preference? You're lying and we all know it.
If you play that game, you're gonna quarantine 90% of the population lol.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:03 pm to CAD703X
quote:Could be wrong, but I think they are trying to force her to do so.
so they're not FORCING her to do anything..she's the one that said "i will not sit here and avoid people".
quote:Well, the issue at hand is whether they have the right to do so.
3. all they are asking is she chill at home for a few more days (she's probably a week or 2 into the 21 days already right?)
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:10 pm to shel311
quote:
Could be wrong, but I think they are trying to force her to do so.
Why doesn't she just stay home for 2 more weeks? I think the reason they are trying to force her to do the rational thing is because she's being an irrational idiot and insisting that she will walk around with no regard to her fellow citizens.
I had TB once. They told me it was very unlikely I could transmit it to anyone but they asked me to stay at home for 2 weeks. I did and wore a mask at all times, terrified I may transmit it to anyone that entered my house. Where is this woman's concern that she could infect someone? It's 2 more weeks of sitting in your house watching TV to make 100% sure you don't infect someone and change their life forever. selfish bitch.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:11 pm to shel311
quote:
Because she has no symptoms?
That's not her call podna.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:13 pm to makinskrilla
quote:Ya don't say!!
That's not her call podna.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:14 pm to Broke
She tested negative. She's clean. A small government conservative would be on her side, logically. Amazing how many would side with the government to lock someone up for "only" 3 weeks for no practical reason.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:15 pm to Al Dante
quote:Why should she have to?
Why doesn't she just stay home for 2 more weeks?
quote:If she has no symptoms, there is no chance she can transmit it, world of a difference, no?
They told me it was very unlikely I could transmit it to anyone
quote:Why should she be concerned if she has no symptoms?
Where is this woman's concern that she could infect someone?
quote:Fwiw, I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat lol.
It's 2 more weeks of sitting in your house watching TV to make 100%
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:27 pm to shel311
quote:
She also has no symptoms, chief.
It can take up to 21 days for those symptoms to start showing there, chief. Hence why they want to quarantine her for 21 days.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:31 pm to shel311
quote:
Why doesn't she just stay home for 2 more weeks?
Why should she have to?
Because she was treating perhaps dozens of people with ebola and they were vomiting and shitting all over her in the last stages of a deadly disease when they were very, very contagious.
quote:
If she has no symptoms, there is no chance she can transmit it, world of a difference, no?
No, it's not. She is a very good candidate to have it, and to ask her to chill for 20 days so that she limits the chance of it spreading it to her neighbors is not some out-of-line request.
quote:
Why should she be concerned if she has no symptoms?
Because though she has no symptoms, it does not mean she does not have it. She should also be concerned because she was around ebola patients that shat and vomited all over her for a month. Why on earth would you not want to err on the side of caution and just sit at home and watch TV for a couple of weeks, guaranteeing that she doesn't spread it?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:32 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
It can take up to 21 days for those symptoms to start showing there, chief. Hence why they want to quarantine her for 21 days.
No symptoms = not contagious, so why lock someone up who poses no threat to anyone?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:34 pm to ColeCoushCoush
quote:
No symptoms = not contagious, so why lock someone up who poses no threat to anyone?
Would you go to her house and hang out with her?
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:37 pm to Al Dante
quote:
Would you go to her house and hang out with her?
Yes.
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:38 pm to ColeCoushCoush
quote:
No symptoms = not contagious, so why lock someone up who poses no threat to anyone?
so if she begins to dvelop symptoms in the middle of a movie and coughs on the people in front of her and smears her ebola-ness on the bathroom stall handles & faucets, that's okey dokey?
eta oh i forgot, she's a nurse and would make sure she doesn't infect anyone if that happen.
This post was edited on 10/29/14 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 10/29/14 at 5:41 pm to Al Dante
quote:were you saying every person in Dallas who treated the ebola patient should be quarantined? I don't recall seeing anyone really saying that, so what's the difference?
Because she was treating perhaps dozens of people with ebola and they were vomiting and shitting all over her in the last stages of a deadly disease when they were very, very contagious.
quote:no difference between being contagious and not contagious?
No, it's not
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News