- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JFK file investigation
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:36 am to BigNastyTiger417
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:36 am to BigNastyTiger417
I think Oswald was the lone shooter, but I dont think he was the only person involved in the plot.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:37 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:And she will get to choose which documents are released and what is or isn't redacted from them. I think it's possible she's being dishonest, attention-seeking, had preconceived biases that led her to selectively interpret the evidence, or simply that reasonable people could reach different conclusions based on what she's seen. I also think it's possible she's 100% spot on, but that it's naive to unquestioningly accept her conclusion as "the truth" at this point.
She is reviewing documents that will be released to the public. Do you really think she is being dishonest?
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 8:48 am
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think Oswald was the lone shooter, but I dont think he was the only person involved in the plot.
you believe the impossible single bullet theory. very rational of you
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:51 am to Boodis Man
quote:
you believe the impossible single bullet theory. very rational of you
You dont seem to know what rationality means.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:53 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You dont seem to know what rationality means
Go on then mate. Educate us all on how one bullet caused all of those wounds, all while remaining in nearly pristine shape
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:56 am to Boodis Man
quote:
Go on then mate. Educate us all on how one bullet caused all of those wounds, all while remaining in nearly pristine shape
Youre emotional, not rational.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:34 am to REG861
Just finished a book called First Hand Knowledge by Robert D. Morrow. Morrow was CIA during the Bay of Pigs fiasco and indicated in the book, his superior officer ordered him to purchase 4-Italian Carcano riffles before the assassination. My opinion CIA, FBI, Mafia, and Cuban exiles were networks working together on this. This book is a prequel to JFK assassination. Nixon was VP at the time of the Bay of Pigs. Washington needs to add another file to investigate called Operation 40 which Nixon was involved in.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
Oswald was shooting from behind Kennedy. The fatal shot has Kennedy’s head moving back & left. If Oswald fired the fatal shot, Kennedy’s head would have went forward and slightly to the left.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:36 am to Boodis Man
It cannot be rationally (or physically) explained.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:37 am to bosco107
quote:During the planning, not the actual operation.
Nixon was VP at the time of the Bay of Pigs.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:37 am to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
The fatal shot has Kennedy’s head moving back & left. If Oswald fired the fatal shot, Kennedy’s head would have went forward and slightly to the left.
Not necessarily. This has been discussed for years.
There are some seemingly anomalous things regarding the assassination, but you can say that about any historical event.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
Yes. The Zapruder film clearly shows it. People who discuss it simply don’t want to believe the fact that there was a conspiracy.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:44 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre emotional, not rational.
Just as I thought. Talking out of your azz.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:45 am to Boodis Man
quote:
Just as I thought. Talking out of your azz.
You can wish something to be true all you want, and it will still not be true. Conspiracy theory weirdos do just that.
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 9:46 am
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:50 am to RogerTheShrubber
You can deny truth as well. Your opinion doesn’t change the fact that there was more than 1 shooter.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:55 am to BigNastyTiger417
Yo
I'm not denying anything. I proposed one shooter, and others in on the conspiracy and you people started crying.
quote:
u can deny truth as well.
I'm not denying anything. I proposed one shooter, and others in on the conspiracy and you people started crying.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:02 am to bosco107
quote:
Just finished a book called First Hand Knowledge by Robert D. Morrow. Morrow was CIA during the Bay of Pigs fiasco and indicated in the book, his superior officer ordered him to purchase 4-Italian Carcano riffles before the assassination. My opinion CIA, FBI, Mafia, and Cuban exiles were networks working together on this. This book is a prequel to JFK assassination. Nixon was VP at the time of the Bay of Pigs. Washington needs to add another file to investigate called Operation 40 which Nixon was involved in.
Read Coup In Dallas next.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:25 am to bosco107
Come on man, you really believe the government and the mafia and Cuban exiles worked together to assassinate the President of the United States? That is ridiculous. With the staggering amount of men who would be involved in such a plot someone would have squawked before the event.
And after all of these decades there is still no proof of such a thing. It's all just talk and gossip and suspicion with zero hard evidence.
And after all of these decades there is still no proof of such a thing. It's all just talk and gossip and suspicion with zero hard evidence.
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 10:26 am
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:30 am to REG861
Read Lee and me. From Oswald’s girlfriend at the time.
Whether one shooter or two doesn't matter as Oswald was CIA asset
Whether one shooter or two doesn't matter as Oswald was CIA asset
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Your opinion is wrong. Their is proof of 2 shooters.
Popular
Back to top
