- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If next winter is hotter than this winter will more people believe in "warming"?
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:33 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:33 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
So in 150 years the temp has changed 1.5 degrees, yet this is has never happened before. And I'm sure there are collecting the same temps in the same locations with the same accuracy. Amirite?
1
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:33 pm to Jake88
quote:
taxes
Would you support regulations on greenhouse gas emissions that didn't increase anyone's income taxes? Why not?
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:34 pm to wickowick
quote:
So in 150 years the temp has changed 1.5 degrees, yet this is has never happened before.
Ice cores and geology tell us that is probably correct.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:35 pm to AboveGroundPool
quote:
it sounds like you have no idea what they're about...and I'd bet money u don't
Why don't you enlighten us buddy. Nixon had a socialist plot cooking with the clean air act?
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:35 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
If you aren't incresing cost of goods via taxes, you are incresing it due to compliance, there is no net difference.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:36 pm to Napoleon
quote:
and temp averages do back that up.
No they don't.
Good god you're a fricking idiot.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:39 pm to wickowick
quote:
If you aren't incresing cost of goods via taxes, you are incresing it due to compliance, there is no net difference.
That is a fair argument. Probably that is where we will just agree to disagree. I would argue there is a way you can apportion the costs of the regs in such a way it doesn't cause an undue burden on business or consumers.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:39 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
No. Increased regulation leads to increased costs passed on to the consumer.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:42 pm to Napoleon
Omgzz! We have to tax the weather to get this to stop!!!
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:43 pm to Jake88
Maybe, maybe not. I understand that in pure economic terms that's correct, but you can offset it through other tax breaks. The fed gov does shite like this all the time. Again, these are the same arguments people used against the clean air and water acts, and it has been fine.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:44 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Do you even Dangaard-Oeschger Event, brah?
quote:
In the Northern Hemisphere, they take the form of rapid warming episodes, typically in a matter of decades, each followed by gradual cooling over a longer period. For example, about 11,500 years ago, averaged annual temperatures on the Greenland ice sheet warmed by around 8 °C over 40 years, in three steps of five years (see,[3] Stewart, chapter 13), where a 5 °C change over 30–40 years is more common.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:44 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Would you support regulations on greenhouse gas emissions that didn't increase anyone's income taxes?
I would not because it will increase costs to us in production costs passed to the customer but mostly BECAUSE IT IS CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF SOME SCIENTISTS AND OTHERS GETTING A PAY CHECK FOR NOTHING.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:46 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
. Again, these are the same arguments people used against the clean air and water acts, and it has been fine
Way different than GLOBAL climate change.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:47 pm to CptBengal
quote:
quote:
and temp averages do back that up.
No they don't.
Good god you're a fricking idiot.
Computer generated averages baw.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:49 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Ice cores and geology tell us that is probably correct.
You are aware that the CO2 levels from ice cores are just a vague estimation, right?
Probably not, you're swimming in the koolaid and seem incapable of having a rational thought.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:49 pm to Napoleon
It has been hot for sure but it has been hot before.
Today in Orlando it is projected to 82.
The record for this day is 85...set in 1956.
Today in Orlando it is projected to 82.
The record for this day is 85...set in 1956.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:50 pm to Jake88
quote:
Way different than GLOBAL climate change.
Yes. There is no way they are compensating for the effects of the sun, volcanoes and cow farts. These influences make their little computer generated human effects of no consequence whatsoever.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:50 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You are aware that the CO2 levels from ice cores are just a vague estimation, right?
Even worse is that the 1.5 degrees of smaller than the error in the temperature readings
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:51 pm to Helo
quote:
The record for this day is 85...set in 1956.
I wonder what the record in Siberia is.
Posted on 12/23/15 at 12:52 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
I'm not the one trying to politicize the argument by making general statements tying certain views to politics, I don't give 2 shits about politics involved.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News