Started By
Message

re: I absolutely abhore CVT’s.

Posted on 1/22/19 at 7:33 pm to
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
4107 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

My 2009 Nissan has over 130,000 miles and never had a problem 




Wife's Altima (my old one) has over 110,000. My current one has just over 40,000. No cvt issues.

Current 2016 is averaging 34.2mpg.
Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
4107 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

torque band is weak



Absolutely incorrect. The entire premise of a cvt is to keep the RPMs in the best torque range.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

subaru's CVT is quite good and reliable


I have an Outback in my driveway with a broken CVT right now.

$7000 car with a $4000 transmission issue.

frick me.

As far as being weak; the Outback has a 3,500 LB towing capacity. A JK Wrangler has 1,500.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 7:40 pm
Posted by Lynyrd
Under the Tilt-a-Whirl
Member since Jun 2010
13385 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

but ultimately the average car consumer is too naïve to realize how much the CVT sucks arse and will continue to buy.

I bought a product from Range that plugs into the computer port on my Chevrolet 1500 that you leave in and it stops the AFM (Automatic Feul Management) from engaging and stopping it from swapping between 8 cylinders and 4. No real difference in fuel mileage.
Range
Appears to be for only a few makes, but any AFM deleter "should" stop the transmission from swapping back and forth, I would think.

Eta: It's been in ~8 months and it stays in 8 cyl mode.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 7:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram